Jump to content

Quartz battery tester?


Len33

Recommended Posts

For the hobbyist, what would you suggest as a reliable and reasonable quartz battery tester?

Something that is easy to apply, accurate and moderately priced.

I don't mean the £1.99 free post Hong Kong battery testers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To test the battery, just use any multimeter. But that is not normally needed, because if you work with quartz watches, you should have a new battery to replace, and one is interested in getting the watch to work.

Note, what has been linked above does not have a "line free" function, which is useful to free up watches that have got stuck old oil, (do not assume that is a so common case). It is also ridiculously priced. Check Ebay item 121926556898 for a model that has that.

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

jdm is spot on. I use a £30 quartz tester with line free. However the battery test bit is poor so I use a separate Chinese special. Mine only cost 99p

I don't though assume a new battery is fine. A quick test can save hours of grief. I was that man!

Cheers Neil

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a "multimeter"  (volt/ohm meter)  is not the proper tool for battery testing.   besides  voltage,  you have to put a load on the  bat..  these type meters are expenceve  and wear out.  new battery is the easy way.  vin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

a "multimeter"  (volt/ohm meter)  is not the proper tool for battery testing.   besides  voltage,  you have to put a load on the  bat..  these type meters are expenceve  and wear out

Never happened to me. Voltage under no load has always been a 100% reliable indicator of batter status, and my digital cheap meter works good as when new 20 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

above does not have a "line free" function, which is useful to free up watches It is also ridiculously priced. Check Ebay item 121926556898 for a model that has that.

That eBay "economy" tester is what I have been using for years.  It has proved to be very useful, and at the price can't be bettered!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Has anyone got the instructions for the one JDM mentioned above. I bought one last week and there were no instructions with it. Ta


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Have a read of this thread:-

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...