Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello,

 This Girard-Perregaux watch (21 Jewel, calibre 03B) runs fine in dial up position, but will start to sputter and sometimes even stops as it is rotated to dial-down position. I looked closely at the hairspring balance shaft and noticed one of the ends looks eroded and short. I am hoping to replace the balance shaft with a new one which I have purchased from the Netherlands (vacheron seller on ebay). 

DSCN3257.JPG

 

1.JPG

4.JPG

5.JPG

8.JPG

Now, what I am seeking in posting this is help with:

1) Confirmation of the need to replace the balance shaft judging from the pictures--

2) Can I perform the balance shaft swap without a staking set and poising tool?

 

P.S. I looked up some info, and I know I have to mark on  the balance wheel before I remove the roller table and jewel

Thanks very much in advance for any information.

JC

Posted

All good things come from the Lowlands...I know this seller by person, very nice lady with a lot of experience.

Great project JC, I hope you get it working.

Posted

I don't know of any way to remove a balance staff without the use of a staking tool, a Platax tool or a lathe.

What ever tool you use you will still need a staking tool to fit the new one.

  •  
Posted
6 hours ago, Watchtime said:

All good things come from the Lowlands...I know this seller by person, very nice lady with a lot of experience.

Great project JC, I hope you get it working.

Thanks watchtime. 

JC

Posted
45 minutes ago, clockboy said:

I don't know of any way to remove a balance staff without the use of a staking tool, a Platax tool or a lathe.

What ever tool you use you will still need a staking tool to fit the new one.

  •  

Thanks for the reply. I'll have to look at some of Marks videos videos, start bidding for a staking set, and also get a spare movement for when I mess up....:huh:

JC

Posted

staking set - must

poising tool - not critical as long as the roller goes back in the same position you removed it. 

i recommend buying a ut 6497 to practice with, because if you destroy that roller or bend the wheel bad your going to have a hard time getting parts. GP always was bad about parts

Posted
8 hours ago, IllinoisWatch said:

staking set - must

poising tool - not critical as long as the roller goes back in the same position you removed it. 

i recommend buying a ut 6497 to practice with, because if you destroy that roller or bend the wheel bad your going to have a hard time getting parts. GP always was bad about parts

Unitas 6497...OK. The Platax tool is stratospherically priced for a poor man like me. I'll have to try to either get a donor movement and *pray* that it arrives intact, or go ahead with securing a staking set. This 03B movement is impossible to get parts for. Its such a nice lookin watch and the 36mm size makes it look modern interns of proportions...Have to put it aside until I can afford one of the options. Thanks for the reply.

JC

Posted

Is it an original GP manufacture or a modified ETA movement? If you have a partnumber I am happy to take aq look in the stock i bought from a watchmaker, there are hundreds of balanceshafts in the stock.

Posted (edited)

Hello,

I think this 03B is a GP manufactured movement based on the AS 1130. The Urdelar website says the GP 03b is all parts same as AS1130 except the plate, bridges and balance cock http://www.urdelar.se/girard-perregaux?product_id=3000.

 

When I go to the Ranfft website however, it states the GP03 balance shaft is U2392; while the AS 1130 is U2823/U892/U3132. I am trying to secure a good staking set and would welcome any suggestions. I am also going to see if a donor movement with a good balance is perhaps a cheaper and easier alternative. The endpoint is the same in both cases: enable this watch to run and keep time.

 

 

note: The watch started to run when I picked it up as can be seen in photograph, but it  sounds off, and the balance wheel is wobbling slightly.

DSCN0773.jpg

I will be very appreciative for any help I can get on this project!

Regards,

JC

 

 

Edited by noirrac1j
too many notes!
Posted

Looks to me like the lower pivot (under the roller table) is pretty much gone.  That probably explains why the watch will run dial up, since it will be sitting on the other pivot which looks a little bit better.  Any other position would be a problem though.

You'll certainly require a staking set to rivet the new balance staff in place.  The Platax tool or lathe would be the best way to remove the old staff but both will be expensive.  You can find some K&D Balance Staff Removers on eBay (they'll work with the K&D staking set) but I've never used one and cannot say if it's a worthwhile expenditure or not.

If you know a good watchmaker in your area that person may be willing to remove the old staff for you though- that might be the most economical solution.

That's a really nice movement too- it looks like most of the gear train is capped with jewels.

Posted (edited)

I found these but I am not sure because of the numbers on the envelope...Should I look for the numbers U2392 as I have 2392 but it has another brandname on it....or a 2823 stamped Omega...

 

IMG_1285.JPG

Edited by Watchtime
Posted
23 hours ago, RyMoeller said:

Looks to me like the lower pivot (under the roller table) is pretty much gone.  That probably explains why the watch will run dial up, since it will be sitting on the other pivot which looks a little bit better.  Any other position would be a problem though.

You'll certainly require a staking set to rivet the new balance staff in place.  The Platax tool or lathe would be the best way to remove the old staff but both will be expensive.  You can find some K&D Balance Staff Removers on eBay (they'll work with the K&D staking set) but I've never used one and cannot say if it's a worthwhile expenditure or not.

If you know a good watchmaker in your area that person may be willing to remove the old staff for you though- that might be the most economical solution.

That's a really nice movement too- it looks like most of the gear train is capped with jewels.

Hello Ry, Yes you're correct about the pivot under the roller table being the suspected culprit. But it runs better dial side down! I am going to try to get a staking set, but the darn things are so expensive. I am also trying to get a donor movement which will come in handy as well. Thank you for the input.

 

JC

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Watchtime said:

I found these but I am not sure because of the numbers on the envelope...Should I look for the numbers U2392 as I have 2392 but it has another brandname on it....or a 2823 stamped Omega...

 

IMG_1285.JPG

Hello Watchtime,

I don't know which of these would work. I know that on some website it says that Ronda 3926 is the replacement for the Girard 03b balance staff. I also obtained the measurements, although it probably won't help:

Screen Shot 2016-12-20 at 1.56.40 PM.png

Thanks very much for your efforts! They are much appreciated....

JC

 



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As others have pointed out we discussed this subject in great lengths multiple times on multiple discussion groups. Then we have a subject that has too many variables and generalizations that make all the different things seem like one common removing staffs when it's not. There are variety of balance wheels specifically designed to be hard enough to withstand knocking or pushing a staff out. Rolex has one that the only way the staff is coming out is by pushing it out enough pressure is applied the river breaks with a very satisfying pop. This is because they hairspring cannot be removed until the staff is pushed out through. Then of course Rolex has a nice set of tools just for this purpose. A variety watch companies like Elgin made a balance wheels specifically designed to be hard enough to withstand knocking the staff have. For instance that principle is applied with jeweling tool you mention and here's the complete article down below that explains the procedure. Then of course there are variety watch companies Elgin And Hamilton that specifically designed balance staffs designed to be knocked out because the riveting shoulder is supposed to break. That of course would be the original staffs and probably the aftermarket do not have such features.   One of the problems with all of these tools would be the balance staff itself and of course whatever the balance wheel is made of. Personally I like the rule of if you're knocking the staff out and you gently tap with the hammer and it doesn't just pop out then you do not drive it out you do have to use a lathe. Because for variety of reasons staffs that are perhaps over riveted not quite the right size soft balance arms etc. driving a staff out that doesn't really want to come out it's not your best interest to do that.   A variety of American companies used friction fit staffs. For instance here's an example of Waltham Here's something interesting from Hamilton a specific type of 992 with a specific type of hairspring. Normally the Hamilton friction staff's do not have a groove to indicate such. Such as the Hamilton 992B or the Hamilton deck watch but they only have one staff which is friction. This particular staff has been marked because if you read carefully I suspect originally it might not have had a friction staff this was basically an upgrade. I know I've seen in the staffing assortments the blued hubs as a replacement components.    Then I'm attaching a PDF of Hamilton's thoughts on replacing balance staffs. Notice either the hub where the river can be cut away they don't have a preference it's whatever you like. Plus they mention the staff that is designed to break away. Although I have a suspicion you'll probably never see one of those as it would have to be an original staff and I suspect none of the after markets would have that feature. Hamilton technical data number 129 replacement of broken balance staffs.pdf
    • Thanks for shedding light on the exact problem — you're right, it's the centre tube, not the cannon pinion. That was the issue, and after tightening the centre tube, everything now sits correctly. The train bridge can be fully tightened and all the wheels run freely. I haven’t tested the pallet fork yet as I haven’t refitted it, but I’ll be doing that shortly to confirm if the issue is entirely resolved. @Neverenoughwatches Sorry for misusing the term earlier.
    • If the existing spring is 0.06 then it's been replaced at some time in the past and would potentially be too weak for this movement.
    • A quick addition: Given when I measured the springs I got 1.5 x 0.06 I thought I'd figure out how long they are. I was able to do this from a photograph taken immediately above. The program Inkscape has a nice extension that allows measuring the length of a beizer curve, so I drew one along the length of the spring. It's 220mm. And 1.5 x 0.06x 220 x 7.0 does appear in the catalogue. It would also explain the lower amplitude I'm seeing.  Doesn't immediately solve anything, but the information is nice. 
    • That's because it's not a cannon pinion and just a centre tube. If this was the fault I still wouldn't have expected it to run without the balance. Edit @TimepieceTinkerer To clarify. Did you test the train ran smoothly with everything tightened down before fitted the fork and balance?  
×
×
  • Create New...