Jump to content

Proper amplitude for Unitas 6497


Recommended Posts

Nothing like getting some actual data so I have just put my own 6497's on the timegrapher.

I have a 1960's Le Cheminant pocket watch with an original 17 jewel UT6497 running at 18000bph which I have just serviced (last weekend). Still using original Ms and with the lift angle set at 44° I am getting 271° amp on full wind in the horizontal.

I also have a modern De Tomaso wrist watch with an Asian 6497 clone running at 21600bph. It's about 3 years old and I haven't serviced it. With the lift angle set at 44° I am getting 290° at full wind in the horizontal.

I would say that 240° at full wind was a little low for a freshly oiled modern movement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, like jdm said. If the rate is the same or within 5-10 sec/day difference in the different positions then its ok. Many thing can couse low amplitude. I suggest to check amplitude again after a few days. All the watches i serviced had different gain in amplitude after a few days.

Maybe i make something wrong :) 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume you meant 6497-2 which runs at 21,600? So because I wasn't 100% sure I've attached the specifications for both the 18,000 version and the 21,6000 version timing specifications amplitude etc. You notice they only give a maximum amplitude not a typical running amplitude. The only way to really tell if what you have is right is to wait 24 hours and it has to be better than the minimum.

Then in real life you don't care what the amplitude is sort of. Normally people are more concerned about timekeeping not amplitude unless they're having a problem with timekeeping. What you want to look at is the isochronism number variation from fully wound until 24 hours later. If you're getting that who cares what the amplitude is?

6497-1.JPG

6497-2.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Usually the coiled spring contacts the piezo sounder and the finger spring is the ground.
    • So I checked with my friendly local lab supplier and they can supply the following in 2.5 lt bottles: Tetrachloroethylene (B-Dip) - approx £65 Trichloroethylene (one-dip) - approx £43 n-Heptane 99% (Essence of Renata) - approx £35 Hexane - approx £45 I can't import or buy locally the 'real' products, hence the raw chemicals above. What do you think would be my best option? I'm edging towards Trichloroethylene - I know there are greater health risks, but given the very small quantities used for each treatment and 99.99% of the time it will be sealed in a jar, I think any risk is vanishingly small? This is mainly due to its assumed superior cleaning properties, or from the experience of this group, is the extra cleaning noticeable compared to its safer alternatives?
    • Unfortunately after much investigation, apparently the coil has been discontinued! Shall I get my service guy to try the solder or the conductive paint? 🎨 Final recommendation please🙏
    • Here are the pics of the bridge. Looks correct, but as soon as I screw on the rotor, the watch stops. Video here: https://1drv.ms/v/s!ArG5E62RGctxjokY5ws85BzuJLVakA   Pics. Might have figured it out. I have been working on this watch for a while and since I got it as a non runner in a terrible shape, there was no guarantee that parts were proper. I think the main screw that was used on the rotor was too long, so it was stopping the main train. As soon as I fished out a much shorter and larger headed screw, things were good again. Please celebrate with me.  
    • One-dip or naphtha should be safe, but are you sure it isn't magnetized?  I would also check that.  Although, if that balance is from an Elgin 760 0r 761, I would think it would have a hairspring of non-magnetic alloy.
×
×
  • Create New...