Jump to content

Need to find a mainspring


meep1999

Recommended Posts

I have had a look at my GR catalogue & the following are the nearest I could find:

 

GR 6576    H 2.40     S 0.20     L 520    Dia. 16

GR 6577    H 2.40     S 0.20     L 540    Dia. 16.5

GR 6596    H 2.40     S 0.22     L 520    Dia. 17

Cousins may be your best bet. I have looked in their catalogue & they have in stock.

GR 6578    H 2.40     S 0.20     L 560    Dia. 17

If too long give them call.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could try riveting it in 2 places you would need a donor peice of spring tho you then drill a hole either side of the break and rivet the backing strip on with a brass rivets not the best solution as your break is very near the end where it curves alot your probably better of trying to find a replacement although you wouldnt loose anything by trying to mend it as its alreadt broke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could theoretically repair that spring by letting down the temper on the inner coil and punching a new hole in it. However it is most likely that the rest of the spring is at the end of its useful life.

You should ask yourself the question of what is the "correct" spring for this watch, rather than trying to match what you found. Just as today you can't easily buy every permutation, it will have been that way in the past and the nearest available will have been used. If this watch has had 3 or 4 mainsprings in its life then you could find the one fitted is far from ideal. I would refer to the calculators on this page: http://www.vintagewatchstraps.com/blogmainsprings.php

Assuming that your barrel arbor is 1/3 the diameter of the barrel, then your old spring would only have been able to fit 5 winding turns. Assuming you have a going barrel, not a fusee, then ideally you would have room for 6 1/2 turns, which should give you 35 to 40 hours running.

The calculators on the above page suggest that you should have a spring which is 0.19 thick and 480mm long. Cousins has GR6561 which is 0.19 x 500.

A spring which is too strong (thick) will cause the escapement to bank whereas one too weak will cause a low amplitude which may affect accuracy. Strength is a factor of the cube of the thickness so a small change will have a large effect, but personally on an old watch I would err on the weaker side.

Stuart

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, StuartBaker104 said:

You could theoretically repair that spring by letting down the temper on the inner coil and punching a new hole in it. However it is most likely that the rest of the spring is at the end of its useful life.

You should ask yourself the question of what is the "correct" spring for this watch, rather than trying to match what you found. Just as today you can't easily buy every permutation, it will have been that way in the past and the nearest available will have been used. If this watch has had 3 or 4 mainsprings in its life then you could find the one fitted is far from ideal. I would refer to the calculators on this page: http://www.vintagewatchstraps.com/blogmainsprings.php

Assuming that your barrel arbor is 1/3 the diameter of the barrel, then your old spring would only have been able to fit 5 winding turns. Assuming you have a going barrel, not a fusee, then ideally you would have room for 6 1/2 turns, which should give you 35 to 40 hours running.

The calculators on the above page suggest that you should have a spring which is 0.19 thick and 480mm long. Cousins has GR6561 which is 0.19 x 500.

A spring which is too strong (thick) will cause the escapement to bank whereas one too weak will cause a low amplitude which may affect accuracy. Strength is a factor of the cube of the thickness so a small change will have a large effect, but personally on an old watch I would err on the weaker side.

Stuart

Excellent advise. With vintage watches it is not always possible to get exact replacements.For me repairing the spring would be a very last resort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • While you might have seen it as a humorous/Dramatic remark was done very deliberately so I could get an answer. Let me quote myself? The simplistic of this entire discussion is the group would like the last forever.   If you go to the top of the discussion group you'll find something to click on that says staff. Then you click on Mark's name and you find out interesting things? For instance he was last here on Saturday so yes he is here. If there is a crisis or a problem he is going to be here. You will also find a list of his activity although that's only the public activity. There's a lot of work that goes into running message boards and he probably does a lot of stuff in the background that we don't see to keep it going. Unfortunately message boards do not run themselves. Then regarding this did you notice you can message Mark and ask him. Then if somebody, we could elect somebody from this discussion such as @Neverenoughwatches To reach out I would really keep the message super simple like? You could refer him to this discussion but I would really keep it simple Like for instance the group enjoys his message board and what could we do to keep it going Forever? Then regarding all of the other suggestions comments helpful remarks or ideas? When was the last time any of you bothered to read the message board rules? This is covered which is one of the reasons I did the dramatic things I did to provoke a response of the basics as opposed to starting to suggest or seemingly suggesting all sorts of ideas which are covered by one of the rules found in the section on rules. In other words I'm going to quote something from the rules of the message board.  
    • For me any input from Mark would be great. If he's keeping a close eye i would imagine he has read about our concerns here. But specifically i would like to know if he is ok with us collecting each others contact information for those of us that wish to provide them. 
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • Thank you!   Yes I did. I did not notice a difference. Although 9415 is advertised as a thixotropic grease (and I did had high hopes for it), the only advantage at this point I see is that its “easier” to apply than an oil (if one does not use epilame). But this is subjective, I guess. What I did notice though, if you apply a bit too much grease, that definitely slows down the movement. Oil in this case is a bit more forgiving, as its super thin, and it would usually just spread out.  Again, imho.
    • Mark keeps a close eye on his forum. I'm sure if you asked him he will reply, he might not do it right away but you will receive his answer.  
×
×
  • Create New...