Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Via tapatalk.....

When I go back and edit a post, I now get blank lines inserted between lines of text.

I believe this is a Tapatalk issue. The developers of Tapatalk have not yet allowed for the fact that IPB is not using BBCode any more and is storing the posts with HTML formatting. It is something a lot of Tapatalk users are complaining about.

We'll have to wait for Tapatalk to catch up.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Mark said:

Strange one. I can't replicate the error. Quoting came up perfect. Tried several posts.

If you have non-posted content in the editing window, sometime hitting "quote" doesn't add, or replace it. But if you clear the content, it works fine. Something to do with CKedit handling temporay content.

The feature of partial quoting by selecting text then hitting the notification pop-up is nice.

Posted

I have had no problems logging in to the site since the change but, tonight I kept getting an error message.

I have had to enable an exception in order to allow me to login and access the site. I am using Firefox, version 45.0.1. I don't think there have been any recent updates installed by Firefox on my pc.

It might be something or nothing, I just thought I would advise you on what happened tonight.

Here is the message that appeared.

www.watchrepairtalk.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is unknown. The server might not be sending the appropriate intermediate certificates. An additional root certificate may need to be imported. Error code: SEC_ERROR_UNKNOWN_ISSUER

Posted
On 25/03/2016 at 8:46 AM, Spandrel said:

This method will disable all notofications for all sites, so be aware of that.

In the Firefox address bar type "about:config" without the parentheses then press "enter". You may be presented with a dire warning of the world ending or some such like. Press "OK I'll don full protective headgear" or whatever and press "enter".

In the search box type "dom.web" and find the line "dom.webnotifications.enabled". Double click on it and the "true" will turn to "false". Restart your browser and the nags have ceased.

Mark posted the above just before me and his solution seems the better option as it disables notifications only for this site.

Thanks again Mark.

I have had the same problem and I also use firefox.

Posted

Nothing to do with the software upgrade.

I installed a new server SSL certificate last night - it's most likely related to that.

Works fine in my Chrome browser and also Safari.

Now I have to download Firefox to text :(

The things I do for you guys. Lol

:)

Posted

OK Guys,

I think I have resolved this - I had the wrong intermediate certificate installed. I have replaced this and done some other tweaks.

I had a third party testing website check it out and the following browser/OS combinations show good results apart from IE6 and IE8 on WinXP. But this site won't work on those browsers anyway me thinks - they are too old.

 

Android 2.3.7   No SNI 2RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA  No FS  RC4

Android 4.0.4RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Android 4.1.1RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA   ECDH secp521r1  FS

Android 4.2.2RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA   ECDH secp521r1  FS

Android 4.3RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA   ECDH secp521r1  FS

Android 4.4.2RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp521r1  FS

Android 5.0.0RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA   ECDH secp521r1  FS

Baidu Jan 2015RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA   ECDH secp256r1  FS

BingPreview Jan 2015RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp521r1  FS

Chrome 48 / OS X  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Firefox 31.3.0 ESR / Win 7RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Firefox 42 / OS X  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Firefox 44 / OS X  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Googlebot Feb 2015RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256   ECDH secp521r1  FS

IE 6 / XP   No FS 1   No SNI 2Server closed connection

IE 7 / VistaRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA  No FS

IE 8 / XP   No FS 1   No SNI 2RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA  RC4

IE 8-10 / Win 7  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA   ECDH secp256r1  FS

IE 11 / Win 7  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

IE 11 / Win 8.1  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

IE 10 / Win Phone 8.0RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA  No FS

IE 11 / Win Phone 8.1  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256  No FS

IE 11 / Win Phone 8.1 Update  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

IE 11 / Win 10  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Edge 13 / Win 10  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Edge 13 / Win Phone 10  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Java 6u45   No SNI 2RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA  No FS  RC4

Java 7u25RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Java 8u31RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256   ECDH secp256r1  FS

OpenSSL 0.9.8yRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA   DH 2048  FS

OpenSSL 1.0.1l  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp521r1  FS

OpenSSL 1.0.2e  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Safari 5.1.9 / OS X 10.6.8RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Safari 6 / iOS 6.0.1  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Safari 6.0.4 / OS X 10.8.4  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.0TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Safari 7 / iOS 7.1  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Safari 7 / OS X 10.9  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Safari 8 / iOS 8.4  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Safari 8 / OS X 10.10  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Safari 9 / iOS 9  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Safari 9 / OS X 10.11  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Apple ATS 9 / iOS 9  RRSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp256r1  FS

Yahoo Slurp Jan 2015RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp384r1  FS

YandexBot Jan 2015RSA 2048 (SHA256)  TLS 1.2TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384   ECDH secp521r1  FS

Posted

Could the dirty words check be relaxed a little? "Coarze" (with an s) is a normal word very used in the industry. There are probably many othe false triggers

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

The server now presents the mobile interface when accessing from my usual desktop. Why that could be?

Posted
The server now presents the mobile interface when accessing from my usual desktop. Why that could be?

This website is now responsive. That means it will present itself differently depending on the size of the window. If your browser window is below a certain size then it will present as a tablet or mobile website.

Maximise your browser window to full screen and refresh.

I'm going to close this thread as the software upgrade happened quite a while back :)

If you are still having problems please feel free to start a new thread or open a support ticket using the "support" link in the main menu above.

:)

  • Like 2
  • Mark locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi Watchrepairtalk, I have some questions about part sourcing I was hoping someone here might be able to help with. I'm working on an FHF 180 movement with a broken balance staff, broken regulator pins, and damaged cap jewels (both top and bottom). Some Googling says that this is similar to other FHF calibers like 150s, 160s, 180s and so on but I can't figure out what the functional difference is between these movements.  Is there any reason I wouldn't be able to acquire a donor FHF 150 or similar (with no shock protection) and use parts from that or would it be smarter to source replacements individually? Also are there any sources someone could recommend to get bulk cap jewels like this? Thank you for the help!
    • Hello and welcome to the WRT forum.
    • interesting video nice to see the machine what it can do now I wonder what it costs and I'm sure it's not in my budget. Plus the video brought up questions but the website below answers the questions? What was bothering me was the size of his machine 4 mm because I thought it was bigger than that? But then it occurred to me that maybe they had variations it looks like four, seven and 10. With the seven and 10 being the best because way more tool positions in way more rotating tools. Although I bet you all the rotating tools are probably separate cost https://www.tornos.com/en/content/swissnano   Then as we been talking about Sherline. Just so that everyone's aware of this they have another division their industrial division where you can buy bits and pieces. I have a link below that shows that just in case you don't want to have the entire machine you just need bits and pieces. https://www.sherline.com/product-category/industrial-products-division/   Let's see what we can do with the concept I explained up above and bits and pieces. For one thing you can make a really tiny gear very tiny like perhaps you're going to make a watch. Then another version the center part is not separate it is all machined from one piece. Then fills gear cutting machines have gone through multiple of evolutions. A lot of it based on what he wanted to make like he was going to make a watch unfortunately eyesight issues have prevented that. Another reason why you should start projects like this much sooner when your eyesight is really good or perhaps start on watches first and then move the clocks then local we have from the industrial division? Looks like two separate motors and heads. Then it's hard to see but this entire thing is built on top of a much larger milling machine as a larger milling machine gave a very solid platform to build everything.   Then like everything else that had multiple generations are versions the indexing went through of course variations like above is one version and the one below was the last version. Now the version below I mentioned that previously and somewhere in the beginning to discussion and somebody else had one in their picture. As it is a really nice precision indexing. Then I wasn't sure if I had a the watch photos here is his unfinished watch. No he wasn't going to make a simple watch like none of his clocks were simply either what would be the challenge and that.    
    • Use a Portwest Howie lab coat. They are the biological type so they have tapped cuffs so you don't end up getting the loose cuffs of normal lab coats catching everything. 
    • Some of the Chinese tools ae great and can be purchased at a fraction of the price of Swiss ones, some are complete garbage and some I'm convinced are coming out the same factory as the branded ones.
×
×
  • Create New...