Jump to content

Waltham Pocket Watch


Recommended Posts

5b047b0663093e44680d6ca173c0f164.jpg

ce98573dfad5c29847d435a1f0021095.jpg

Hi guys,

Just thought I would post this. I bought this pocket watch in the summer as a non - runner. It certainly had some issues. A broken mainspring and a wobbly balance. Gave the movement a bit of a clean. Fitted a new mainspring. The balance was ok! Turned out to be a damaged hole jewel in the balance cock. Replaced the jewel from a spare non runner. Assembled the movement and it ran like crap! Thanks to Marks excellent video on how to place a movement "In Beat" it runs sweet. Which I didn't have any understanding of before the video.

Have taken the movement apart and gave it an in depth clean and now is nice and shinny and ready for assembly once the other half stops finding me jobs to do around the house.

Amazing to think that when Fred received this watch for his fiftieth birthday, the Great War still had three years to run.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waltham p/w came in so many different cases and the same with the movements from a bog standard no jewel movements to high grade ones, like wise cases from bog standard to gold.  I used to have boxes of spares but now all gone to some lucky person who ended up buying this stuff when I retired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also I have a 1894 pocket watch size 18 in a solid silver case by an English maker but when opening it up there's the legend "Waltham" it seems English makers bought movements from Waltham And had dials produced with there own name on. I wonder how widespread this practice may of been.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I wonder how widespread this practice may of been.

 

It still goes strong. Look at Invicta, they are essentially Seikos with a fancy case...and many Swiss makers using ETA and Ronda straight out of the factory. Swiss Army watches (Wenger, Victorinox, S.Military (?) ) come to mind...Ronda 515, 715 or ETA equivalent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear bobm12

This has to be a good thing. I have a fear of owning a watch with an "In House" movement when it comes to the cost of repair, if the stories I hear are true. Mainly that manufacturers won't sell spare parts and they have to go back to them. I fear this could be a licence to "Print Money"

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your kind words regarding my grandfather's watch. According to the serial number it was made about 1868 so I think it may well have been my great grandfather's watch first and he would have bought it while still in Europe - what is now Biled, Romania but was then part of the Austria-Hungarain Empire. I wonder how many of these watches were sold in Europe. Anyway, for such an old watch it keeps very good time and I often use it. It has recently been cleaned and had it's rather worn mainspring replaced - probably the original.

 

I read somewhere that Vacheron Constantin bought the movements for their first Overseas watches from Jaeger-LeCoultre but I have no idea if that is true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi ya

If you open the back and look for the serial number on the movement, not the case, it should give you a fair idea when the watch was built. The serial numbers for 1890 should be around the 4,700,000. Hope you can read the picture. If not, type on a Google search "Waltham watch dates" and see what comes up.

a3e2c4a3ff28de4af9a0d2989d14f434.jpg

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waltham pocket watch movements were imported into the UK in large quantities in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. They were quite often cased in Dennison cases - Dennison having moved its case manufactury from the US to the UK. So, you could choose the quality and size of your movement, from the most basic 5 or 7 jewel affair to a 21 or 23 jewel Railroad Grade movement, and then choose your casing - which might be nickel, silver, gold-filled or gold, depending on your pocket.

 

The thing that always strikes me about the US makers - Elgin, Waltham, Hamilton, etc. - is that they brought incredibly accurate and often very beautiful engineering techniques to mass produced products. Millions of watches turned out to superb standards - as good as anything produced today. My Elgin Father Time, for example.

post-64-0-18772000-1453293649_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

on the pocket watch subject - about two years ago i bought (fleabay) a marriage watch from the ukraine. i was REALLY into the look of them and wanted one badly. for those of you who might not know what a marriage watch is, it is a pocket watch movement placed into a wristwatch case.

at any rate, i found one, bid on it and won. it arrived a few weeks later and i couldn't be happier. it has a couple of downfalls that i'm living with. the movement is not signed anywhere, but it is swiss and the seller said it was about 100 years old. it truly looks like it. 21 jewels with the two screws (chatons). it is just a beautiful piece and i enjoy looking at it - and listening to it.

fast forward, in the past month i downloaded the wildspectra watch timing app. on my tablet. i figured i'd check all of my watches. i have mostly seikos and they all fell into the +10 to  -10 minutes or thereabouts. this antique movement (after the app settled down) went immediately to  +0 to  -0 minutes on the graph. it held for about 7 or 8 minutes. i was gobstopped. it says a lot about the older technology. it seems that the makers way back when lived and died by their products - which says a lot considering the technology available back then to produce these fine pieces. i'm still amazed with this watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With something like this a gasket seal for instance if i cant find the relevant information i would use instinct to decide what fits and works best. You have the original gasket ( well maybe its original or hopefully it is )so its fairly easy to determine what material to use. Shape , for that i would look at the gasket seatings, are there grooves or recesses in either the case back or case or both, what shape are the grooves, flat or round etc, how does the gasket sit and behave in those seatings. Next thickness,that is going to be a bit of a guess, especially if the gasket is a soft one that has been heavily compressed over time. This is where a selection is going to come in handy, personally i would be choosing one that is giving me the feel of compression as its coming into contact with both of the mating surfaces. But not so much that the gasket is going to squash out and become distorted, again this is guesswork and feel is required with the allowance of compression over time, something you may want to check after six months. This part is a little moot as without a pressure test, good water resistance is not assured so the watch needs to treated as such and not as if it were a new diving watch ( not that i would treat any new diving watch as if were ). What you want to expect from your efforts is a little accidental rain catch, if you want more water resistance guarantee then a professional gasket replacement and pressure test is what you should be seeking which will be more than the value of this watch. Coincidentally i have the same watch, been searching for a stem for it for a while now. 
    • It might not be a hook it might be something like this. But still the mainspring is catching on something on the slip ring because it doesn't have its own outer slipping part like the modern ones. The image below came from some vintage Omega thing I'll have to see if I can find where that has gone to.documentation A different book has this          
    • I did not see a hook on the slip ring. I will check again tomorrow.
    • I think I'm having a confusion here? You would apply the breaking grease to the inside of the barrel then the slip ring would go inside. Then the mainspring goes in and it catches on the hook on the slip ring.
    • Thank you for the once again very thorough and informative reply. I'm sure at this point it's academic, but I'm always curious to know best practices. This then implies that If I'm planning to reuse the old mainspring (which I am), I should also reinstall the slip ring. I will do that and apply braking grease to the inside of the slip ring as if it were the barrel. This makes the most sense to me. Also, that bit about the center cannon pinion is very helpful. That wasn't in the tech sheet I have (attached) dated 1970. Omega 1001(1).pdf
×
×
  • Create New...