Jump to content

Waltham Pocket Watch

digginstony
 Share

Recommended Posts

digginstony Super WRT Addict

digginstony

Posted
Posted

5b047b0663093e44680d6ca173c0f164.jpg

ce98573dfad5c29847d435a1f0021095.jpg

Hi guys,

Just thought I would post this. I bought this pocket watch in the summer as a non - runner. It certainly had some issues. A broken mainspring and a wobbly balance. Gave the movement a bit of a clean. Fitted a new mainspring. The balance was ok! Turned out to be a damaged hole jewel in the balance cock. Replaced the jewel from a spare non runner. Assembled the movement and it ran like crap! Thanks to Marks excellent video on how to place a movement "In Beat" it runs sweet. Which I didn't have any understanding of before the video.

Have taken the movement apart and gave it an in depth clean and now is nice and shinny and ready for assembly once the other half stops finding me jobs to do around the house.

Amazing to think that when Fred received this watch for his fiftieth birthday, the Great War still had three years to run.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldhippy Distinguished Member

oldhippy

Posted
Posted

Waltham p/w came in so many different cases and the same with the movements from a bog standard no jewel movements to high grade ones, like wise cases from bog standard to gold.  I used to have boxes of spares but now all gone to some lucky person who ended up buying this stuff when I retired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
digginstony Super WRT Addict

digginstony

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Also I have a 1894 pocket watch size 18 in a solid silver case by an English maker but when opening it up there's the legend "Waltham" it seems English makers bought movements from Waltham And had dials produced with there own name on. I wonder how widespread this practice may of been.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bobm12 Distinguished Member

bobm12

Posted
Posted

 

I wonder how widespread this practice may of been.

 

It still goes strong. Look at Invicta, they are essentially Seikos with a fancy case...and many Swiss makers using ETA and Ronda straight out of the factory. Swiss Army watches (Wenger, Victorinox, S.Military (?) ) come to mind...Ronda 515, 715 or ETA equivalent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
digginstony Super WRT Addict

digginstony

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Dear bobm12

This has to be a good thing. I have a fear of owning a watch with an "In House" movement when it comes to the cost of repair, if the stories I hear are true. Mainly that manufacturers won't sell spare parts and they have to go back to them. I fear this could be a licence to "Print Money"

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Folkvisor Super WRT Addict

Folkvisor

Posted
Posted

Thank you all for your kind words regarding my grandfather's watch. According to the serial number it was made about 1868 so I think it may well have been my great grandfather's watch first and he would have bought it while still in Europe - what is now Biled, Romania but was then part of the Austria-Hungarain Empire. I wonder how many of these watches were sold in Europe. Anyway, for such an old watch it keeps very good time and I often use it. It has recently been cleaned and had it's rather worn mainspring replaced - probably the original.

 

I read somewhere that Vacheron Constantin bought the movements for their first Overseas watches from Jaeger-LeCoultre but I have no idea if that is true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
digginstony Super WRT Addict

digginstony

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hi ya

If you open the back and look for the serial number on the movement, not the case, it should give you a fair idea when the watch was built. The serial numbers for 1890 should be around the 4,700,000. Hope you can read the picture. If not, type on a Google search "Waltham watch dates" and see what comes up.

a3e2c4a3ff28de4af9a0d2989d14f434.jpg

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WillFly Distinguished Member

WillFly

Posted
Posted

Waltham pocket watch movements were imported into the UK in large quantities in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. They were quite often cased in Dennison cases - Dennison having moved its case manufactury from the US to the UK. So, you could choose the quality and size of your movement, from the most basic 5 or 7 jewel affair to a 21 or 23 jewel Railroad Grade movement, and then choose your casing - which might be nickel, silver, gold-filled or gold, depending on your pocket.

 

The thing that always strikes me about the US makers - Elgin, Waltham, Hamilton, etc. - is that they brought incredibly accurate and often very beautiful engineering techniques to mass produced products. Millions of watches turned out to superb standards - as good as anything produced today. My Elgin Father Time, for example.

post-64-0-18772000-1453293649_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ramrod Super WRT Addict

ramrod

Posted
Posted

on the pocket watch subject - about two years ago i bought (fleabay) a marriage watch from the ukraine. i was REALLY into the look of them and wanted one badly. for those of you who might not know what a marriage watch is, it is a pocket watch movement placed into a wristwatch case.

at any rate, i found one, bid on it and won. it arrived a few weeks later and i couldn't be happier. it has a couple of downfalls that i'm living with. the movement is not signed anywhere, but it is swiss and the seller said it was about 100 years old. it truly looks like it. 21 jewels with the two screws (chatons). it is just a beautiful piece and i enjoy looking at it - and listening to it.

fast forward, in the past month i downloaded the wildspectra watch timing app. on my tablet. i figured i'd check all of my watches. i have mostly seikos and they all fell into the +10 to  -10 minutes or thereabouts. this antique movement (after the app settled down) went immediately to  +0 to  -0 minutes on the graph. it held for about 7 or 8 minutes. i was gobstopped. it says a lot about the older technology. it seems that the makers way back when lived and died by their products - which says a lot considering the technology available back then to produce these fine pieces. i'm still amazed with this watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • aac58
      Rare Seiko 5actus Watch??!! With a lot🤪🤔😲

      By aac58 · Posted

      This is not rare at all, the dial code and case code don't usually match.
    • Kkramme
      Coil for old Seiko Credor -- 4002920

      By Kkramme · Posted

      Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Kkramme
      Rare Seiko 5actus Watch??!! With a lot🤪🤔😲

      By Kkramme · Posted

      Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • Mercurial
      Smit

      By Mercurial · Posted

      I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • GuyMontag
      FHF70 balance jewels settings

      By GuyMontag · Posted

      It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
×
×
  • Create New...