Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi Folks.  This is my first attempt at servicing a non-shock balance.  The watch was in  reasonably good order before I serviced it.  Now it isn't, and I'm trying to discover what I have done wrong. 

BEFORE I did anything:  readings for dial up position were:

Rate -46 s/day,  Amplitude 257,  beat error 0.8 ms.

AFTER I cleaned and oiled the balance jewels:

Rate +660 s/day, amplitude 155,  beat error 8.5 ms.

I'm sure you can see,  this was not the outcome I was looking for.  ðŸ™„

I only detached the hairspring stud from the cock,  and detached the balance assembly in order to get access to the upper jewels.  I didn't alter or move anything on the balance assembly.  I have not moved the hairspring collet on the staff.

I think I may have messed up when re-installing the hairspring to the balance cock. 

I have before and after pictures of the balance.  The section of the hairspring between the regulator pin and the mounting stud appears to be bulging outwards now.  Might this be the problem?  Did I do something wrong when I closed the "clamp" on the regulator pin?  I'd appreciate any advice that might get me on the right track.

Thanks and regards, Chris.

BEFORE PICTURES

before.jpg.f72fdb68ac25d408e44f96a18f46338d.jpg        before2.jpg.519ebc3fde0f58edf7694c3942501fdb.jpg

AFTER PICTURE

after.thumb.jpg.4dc1ffa6c4e43e41694640743d127f01.jpg

 

Posted

 Faster rate and lower amplitude,  points  to a hairspring issue, perhaps spring is rubbing on underside of the cock, and spring bulging in terminal curve section, moves impulse pin thus increased BE.

 Side view of hairspring coil, would show if its rubbing, which might happen ONLY when oscilator is swinging. 

Good luck 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
  On 3/24/2025 at 4:35 AM, Nucejoe said:

Side view of hairspring coil, would show if its rubbing, which might happen ONLY when oscilator is swinging. 

Expand  

Good tip! Thank you!

Side view of the hairspring shows that the regulator boot is holding the spring tightly against the pin,  at a level higher than the attachment stud.  This is pulling the spring upward into a bowl shape.  

It also looks as if this is causing the outer edge of the hairspring to touch the inboard edge of the balance cock.

See pictures.

I'm going to try, very carefully, to rotate the boot just enough to let the spring drop into its proper place.

bootDish3.thumb.jpg.297253b97639c49ffbbc88fc2beb6764.jpg

 

bootdish2.thumb.jpg.442d09512fcf03c6e54c01c3d82a851c.jpg

 

hairspringtouchingBC.thumb.jpg.39981558b9c921b57e526ca22eb783eb.jpg

 

 

Posted
  On 3/24/2025 at 3:47 AM, ChrisInOz said:

I'm sure you can see,  this was not the outcome I was looking for.  ðŸ™„

Expand  

😄   We've all been there and got the t-shirt. I also have the office shirt , tie, jacket and matching trousers, I drew the line at shiny shoes, nothing with prise me from my Converse 😄

  On 3/24/2025 at 3:47 AM, ChrisInOz said:

only detached the hairspring stud from the cock,  and detached the balance assembly in order to get access to the upper jewels.  I didn't alter or move anything on the balance assembly.  I have not moved the hairspring collet on the staff.

I think I may have messed up when re-installing the hairspring to the balance cock. 

Expand  

Easily done fella,  this is potentially a 70 yr old watch with a 70yr old hairspring, with the elasticity of Chinese takeaway soft noodle . 

😄 Lets see if we can all chip in and help improve on it 🙂

The best picture position for the members to evaluate the hairspring is directly from above. Nevenbekriev is a wizard at pinpointing issues of the hairspring, somehow he manages to do it even with blurred pictures 😄, like some sort of fricking guru..damn it 🤣.  So the rate has made a big jump with short oscillator swings, to me and probably everyone else that indicates some interference with the hairspring. Touching something or touching itself.... sounds pretty normal for an adolescent if you ask me ..but it's possibly 70 years old 🤔... that  actually sounds fairly normal as well, if it's a male spring. 

A side photo also in this case would help immensely in spotting hairspring interference. 

Its the main body of the hairspring from the side that would be helpful here. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
  On 3/24/2025 at 8:33 AM, AndyGSi said:

Is it just the angle of the photo or is it bent up / not pressed down?

image.png.8ebcdda8f1c7ca378a9e62d1a7dfc963.png

Expand  

Reg arm looks bent

Maybe it's just me but I hate to see hairsprings without a dedicated terminal curve. I fail to see how the reg arm will track the last portion of the spring, pushing the spring either in or out as the arm moves from one end to the other. The arc movement of the reg arm can't track a spiral. See the difference in the spacing of the end curve  ! 

Screenshot_20250324-083527_Samsung Internet.jpg

The inner pin will pull the spring as the rate is adjusted to increase, closing up the coils at their 11 oclock position in the picture. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
  On 3/24/2025 at 8:38 AM, Neverenoughwatches said:

Reg arm looks bent

Expand  

It's not bent, it just hasn't been pushed down in to place correctly.

Gently pushing out and down at the arrow should allow it to clip back in to place.

Then the hairspring adjustment  ðŸ˜² 

image.png.67a6023c6e9914d7e16c9ce639c4b277.png

Edited by mikepilk
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

Just realised you can see it here too.

image.thumb.png.17749418e696b7506a4d044726126db7.png

Edit

Could it be the way they've inserted the jewel into the fork when fitting?

Edited by AndyGSi
  • Like 2
Posted
  On 3/24/2025 at 8:50 AM, mikepilk said:

It's not bent, it just hasn't been pushed down in to place correctly.

Gently pushing out and down at the arrow should allow it to clip back in to place.

Then the hairspring adjustment  ðŸ˜² 

image.png.67a6023c6e9914d7e16c9ce639c4b277.png

Expand  

Good spot mike

It might click into place , unlike a shock setting though with beat adjustment.  The jewel plate holds the rate arm under it , the op might need to dissemble again.

Close up the gap on the arm and reassemble it. 

  • Like 2
Posted

I agree with the observation made by @mikepilk and @AndyGSi. The regulator arm hasn't pressed down all the way.

Also, I noticed that the regulator arm isn't in its "before" position. It has been moved to speed up the rate towards F(ast) A(vance). Ensure the balance spring isn't pinched between the boot and the index pin before you move it back towards S(low)/R(etard).

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Might be the screw above ...overtightened it and that side of the arm has popped out.

The arm doesn't click in like a shock setting, its assembled under the fixed jewel plate and held by the two screws ( heads underneath ) I do think the op needs to take apart ( as much as it's a pain ) and close up the split in the arm.

Maybe there is a bit of a leading edge on the arm or the plate ? that's forcing the arm out when the screw is tightened .

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

When refitting the balance and spring it’s not done on a flat surface there is always the chance of displacing the regulator arm. Done that my self as the regulator arm is split and works on a undercut and friction.

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 3/24/2025 at 9:10 AM, Neverenoughwatches said:

The arm doesn't click in like a shock setting, its assembled under the fixed jewel plate and held by the two screws ( heads underneath ) I do think the op needs to take apart ( as much as it's a pain ) and close up the split in the arm.

Expand  

Yes I agree.  I will need to release the hairspring stud and take the balance off the cock again, so I can get at the jewel plate screws.  Hopefully I can then just loosen them enough to let me tuck the regulator arm in between the jewel plate and the cock, without actually taking the screws out again.

Thank you, everyone who pointed this out. I had completely missed the regulator arm split issue. Clearly I need to improve my observation skills.

  On 3/24/2025 at 9:09 AM, VWatchie said:

Ensure the balance spring isn't pinched between the boot and the index pin before you move it back towards S(low)/R(etard).

Expand  

I think the boot is definitely pinching the spring against the index pin at the moment,  and that is part of the reason why the spring is being pulled up into a bowl shape.  I will correct that when I reassemble after re-seating the regulator arm.

  On 3/24/2025 at 10:05 AM, watchweasol said:

When refitting the balance and spring it’s not done on a flat surface there is always the chance of displacing the regulator arm. Done that my self as the regulator arm is split and works on a undercut and friction.

Expand  

The regulator arm was detached when I took out the jewel plate for cleaning,  as it is the jewel plate that holds it on the balance cock.  I was always going to have to reset it because of that.  I just haven't done it yet, because my faults in assembly had completely messed up the performance of the balance.

  On 3/24/2025 at 8:38 AM, Neverenoughwatches said:

See the difference in the spacing of the end curve  !

Expand  

This may be partly due to the regulator boot pinching the spring against the index pin.  I think the end curve may be under compression between the regulator and the stud.

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 3/24/2025 at 10:37 AM, ChrisInOz said:

Yes I agree.  I will need to release the hairspring stud and take the balance off the cock again, so I can get at the jewel plate screws.  Hopefully I can then just loosen them enough to let me tuck the regulator arm in between the jewel plate and the cock, without actually taking the screws out again.

Expand  

If you're going that far, it might be as well to take off the arm completely and close it up a touch. There's a reason it has jumped out ( maybe when you adjusted the rate )  as ww said there is a bevel to the plate, if i remember correctly usually one to the arm as well that helps to centralise the two parts when they're screwed together. I might suggest a very thin smear of grease to one of the bevels, you don't want to see the grease or it will be too much. Maybe a toothpick lightly pushed into candlewax and then run it around the rim....might be an interesting idea.

  On 3/24/2025 at 10:37 AM, ChrisInOz said:
  On 3/24/2025 at 8:38 AM, Neverenoughwatches said:

See the difference in the spacing of the end curve  !

Expand  

This may be partly due to the regulator boot pinching the spring against the index pin.  I think the end curve may be under compression between the regulator and the stud.

Expand  

You need to see what the hairspring is doing without any interference from the regulator pin. Widen the pin/ boot spacing and set the arm along the final coil so neither is touching. Now you can see how the hairspring is behaving between its two fixed points ( ends )

  • Like 1
Posted

The hairspring isn't centered as it was originally. Press at the arrow to get the coil spacing even. The regulator pin gap should be 1.5-2x the hairspring thickness, and the spring should be centered in the gap when at rest. You will have to make gentle nudges at the stud to center it once you've centered the body (coils) by pressing at the arrow. The regulator curve should follow an arc centered on the balance center.

 

It's also out of flat; manipulate it at the stud to bring the opposite side down, and you may still need to lower the stud.

 

The current condition could have the hairspring touching the stud and/or the underside of the balance cock.

 

 

hairspring not centered with arrow.jpg

hairspring not centered arc illustrated.jpg

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Posted
  On 3/24/2025 at 11:56 AM, nickelsilver said:

The regulator pin gap should be 1.5-2x the hairspring thickness, and the spring should be centered in the gap when at rest.

Expand  

Pardon me if this is a dumb question, but is this the gap that should be maintained during normal operation of the watch? 

  On 3/24/2025 at 11:01 AM, Neverenoughwatches said:

I might suggest a very thin smear of grease to one of the bevels, you don't want to see the grease or it will be too much.

Expand  

 

I have some Moebius 9504. Is that suitable?

 

Posted
  On 3/24/2025 at 1:55 PM, ChrisInOz said:

Pardon me if this is a dumb question, but is this the gap that should be maintained during normal operation of the watch?

Expand  

Yes, on a flat hairspring, which you have, you want the gap about that size. On a Breguet (overcoil) you want it as small as possible without binding.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
  On 3/24/2025 at 1:55 PM, ChrisInOz said:

Pardon me if this is a dumb question, but is this the gap that should be maintained during normal operation of the watch? 

 

I have some Moebius 9504. Is that suitable?

 

Expand  

It's maybe not something that anyone else does,  but I had a really stiff reg arm a while back, so i greased the ring very lightly where it fits the jewel plate to ease it up a bit. The candle grease was more of an idea for experimentation,  i know someone that uses candle grease on a mainspring ! Wierd.... right ?

  • Like 2
Posted

image.png

Did You correct this? Not needed to remove the enstone plate, just pressing down the regulator exactly where the arrow is enough, but first remove the balance and press while the cock is supported on something.

The hairspring is not centered and what @nickelsilver  said is the way to correct it, but the reason possibly is that the stud is placed turned in the hole and the screw tightened while the stud is not in correct orientation. Turning the stud clockwise if seen from above will help to center the spring

It will be good if we can see a picture of the hairspring while balance over the cock

  • Thanks 1
Posted
  On 3/24/2025 at 8:00 PM, nevenbekriev said:

Did You correct this? Not needed to remove the enstone plate, just pressing down the regulator exactly where the arrow is enough, but first remove the balance and press while the cock is supported on something.

Expand  

I haven't done this yet.   I will post more pictures when I do.

Posted

OK, I have fixed the regulator arm issue.  It just snapped into place without any need to loosen the jewel plate screws.  It seems to have a positive grip on the plate. It is not difficult to move,  so I have decided not to grease it.

regulatorArm.thumb.jpg.a01b374adfe3b0581e8348ba7555a227.jpg

The hairspring looks reasonably flat when sitting on the balance with the stud end free.

springOnBalance.jpg.c1314a08a3b0ae25a40469d7674b7a63.jpg

 

hairspringplanform.thumb.jpg.dd8cd6ababb57b128119e0b495d1dc10.jpg

 

The top pivot looks a bit weird,  but it seems to be working OK.  I have not done any work on it.

pivot.thumb.jpg.53a24580aa41bc744d51ecbcd4babe50.jpg

I will do more pictures after I have reattached the balance to the cock.

springOnBalance2.jpg

Posted
  On 3/25/2025 at 2:19 AM, ChrisInOz said:

The top pivot looks a bit weird,  but it seems to be working OK.  I have not done any work on it.

Expand  

Looks bent, but that might be an optical illusion. It's funny how that works sometimes. Do you have truing calipers to check?

  • Thanks 1
Posted

AAAAAIEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!

I've BROKEN THE BALANCE !!!!! 😢😢😢😭

I fixed the problems with the regulator arm,  set the boot correctly,  got the hairspring back into reasonable shape.  The movement looked to be running better,  so I took it over to test it on the timegrapher,  only to accidentally catch the balance wheel against the jaws and break off the top pivot.

What a clumsy fool. I am totally disgusted with myself.

brokenbalance.thumb.jpg.4ba6328f60ccc79ad50f9a3484a32bf8.jpg

 

  • Sad 2
Posted (edited)
  On 3/26/2025 at 12:41 PM, ChrisInOz said:

What a clumsy fool. I am totally disgusted with myself.

Expand  

Don't worry, Chris! We've all been there, and it's a part of the learning process. You never stop making mistakes, but gradually, you develop strategies to minimize the risks.

The way out here will be to replace the balance staff. However, that's something that requires quite a few tools, such as a staking set and suitable punches. Perhaps the easiest way out will be to try to source a balance complete (balance wheel + balance staff + balance spring) from a donor movement if one can be found.

Edited by VWatchie
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • See I wondered about this because Frei only lists one part for 18 size, no left or right options whereas they specify left and right for the other sizes. (I happen to be working on a grade 88) I recall seeing an old video of Elgin making laps and jewels in the factory (maybe you were the one who shared it) I have one very weird warming tool which has springy jaws that can open wide enough to hold this type of fork flat, and it swivels so you can position either side over the heat source. It works great for melting shellac on a firmly held fork EXCEPT can you guess what its fatal design flaw is?....   ....you cannot open the springy clamp once it has been heated because you would need to pinch them both between your fingers and you get a second degree burn. Genius.
    • The other thing that makes pallet forks like this interesting is or some of these interesting it when they're not level they don't fit well on the pallet fork warming tool and melting to shellac becomes a challenge. One of things you want to do when working on vintage pocket watches is accumulate broken pocket watches and swiped the jewels from them. Because as you're finding out the vintage jewels were probably not made out of Sapphire there are made out a Garnet and Garnet doesn't seem to hold up as well as shellac. Then the last little part about stones pointing in different directions doesn't make sense? There's always a left stone a right stone angles are different and they both have to be in the same direction. Although I once had a pocket watch command were somebody put one of the stones in backwards and surprisingly the watch ran. Then on some watches I done this with 12 size watches I've been able to swipe pallet stones from other 12 size not even the same company because they may have purchased or stones although Elgin I know at some point in time did make their own tools and had a separate section of the factory that made diamond grinding compound for all their lap and during work. Then when the company got liquidated the diamond division was sold the somebody else in the last I knew it was still running out there but not of course under the Elgin name. Still making diamond grinding compound.   From the 1915 parts catalog you can see all 18 and 16 size pallet stones are basically identical. The difference is what they're made out of and one of them that they didn't policy side in stone probably in a seven jewel watch no one would ever see that anyway. Then you have a new or the old style determines its thickness and you would have of course right and left Then I'm attaching a PDF of Elgin escapement terminology is it is nice drawing to show you the difference between the left and right stones. Elgin watch company Escapement Terminology.PDF
    • The roller table is supposed to be held on by friction. If there is shellac under the roller table it might indicate that an improper repair had occurred prior to this as it would not be held in place with shellac. Sometimes overenthusiastic people re-shellacking the roller jewel will get shellac where it's not supposed to be. Then the picture of your roller it looks kind of damage? It doesn't quite look right it looks like somebody held with a pair of pliers or something? Then your balance wheel has limited quantity of screws? Not necessarily a problem but an indication of perhaps with the other things a prior bad repair perhaps as a guess.  
    • Quartz watches like mechanical watches need to be serviced from time to time. In other words the lubrication with time we'll go bad and the watch Will not run or will not run very well in other words oh be slow because the gears are no longer turning properly due to bad lubrication. Then other things bad for quartz watches basically anything dust that normally wouldn't affect the mechanical watch will affect the quartz watch because the quartz geartrain has extremely little power. So looking at your movement up above more than likely you'd have to clean it and lubricated before the new circuit would work.
    • I be concerned if this roller table belongs !   Timegrapher will ask,  where did you get this roller table or balance staff from?   Regs
×
×
  • Create New...