Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I have the movement almost back together. Just one end stone for the balance and the automatic weight to install.

A quick test of the balance to see if I noticed any improvement and the results looked the same. However something caught my eye…

IMG_1345.thumb.jpeg.a98defd2e3b010d897c0cf2b2a7ad0d0.jpeg
 

This is actually a reenactment as I’d already fixed it before I got a picture and I think it was even further to the negative side. But I thought I’d take a photo as threads are way better with pics.

So I put a small wind in to the movement, got the balance spinning and moved the regulator to the middle position. An immediate improvement in the amplitude that was visible to the eye.

So it looks like my cleaning methods were a bit heavy handed around the balance adjuster. Not to be repeated as I have some baskets on the way which will fix this.

Hoping I’ll be back to normal once I have it all together and on the timegrapher.

Edited by neevo
Posted

Sorry, but what are You trying to do without the jewel setting of the balance?

Seems that the hairspring is a little bent, it will need rectifying. Moving the regulator in reasonable limits should not change the amplitude.

I just looked at the hairspring picture in the page1.

You will have to do some work with the hairspring.

IMG_1343.jpeg.9e00de06620a216c0b4cfdc3a4c2679b.thumb.jpeg.6e153ab77296ff83fcd6c4e5651d46d3.jpegIMG_1343.jpeg.9e00de06620a216c0b4cfdc3a4c2679b.thumb.jpeg.6e153ab77296ff83fcd6c4e5651d46d3.jpeg

Two problems are seen  aside from the fact that the spring is not centered. The white circle shows that two pairs of coils are stacked together. The yellow arrows at the bottom show that the spring is touching the stud.

Now, the stack coils show the spring is sticky or magnetized. As the spring can not be magnetized (it is made of material that don't magnetize), magnetized can be the regulator and stud holder. This is not very probable thou. Did You check if the demagnetizer actually works? Most probably, the spring is sticky. This means that is is not well cleaned or actually contaminated by the process of cleaning. But, what is seen from the picture is that making the spring unstick will not improve it's position (the two problems)

I have placed two red circles. The balance arm covers the spring there so it is not seen. I have drawn it with yellow just to show how it looks. This red circles show where You have to manipulate the spring. You have to open the angle with the bigger circle, this will make the spring concentric and get away from the stud. This will get clear in the process, but may be the angle with the smaller circle will need a little opening too. The idea is the distances shown with yellow arrows to become equal and in the same time the spring to stay concentric. Yes, this is like etachron stud carrier/regulator that can be moved, but i will advice at this point to touch the spring only.

  • Like 2
Posted

My demagnetiser hasn’t arrived yet, but when it does, let me demag the movement and I will take another picture of the balance spring for some advice.

Appreciate everyone’s help.

Posted (edited)

@JohnR725 the demagnetiser came in and here it is with the lid off. Nothing too crazy but looks like a transformer to generate the electrical field, a momentary switch and some electronics that I assume is doing the switching for the collapsing electrical field.

IMG_1366.thumb.jpeg.6cb1d64d78c2ec88f50c340badef2ecc.jpeg

IMG_1365.thumb.jpeg.2333dd9296cb138cde110f61919fa3bb.jpeg
 

I put my tweezers on it to see if it worked as they cause everything they touch to stick to them. A couple of things to note:

1. it moves the tweezers as it activates. Clearly the crosshairs are there for a reason to make sure the object is centralised.

2. I moved the tweezers 90 degrees in between button presses. No idea why I’ve just seen someone do it on YouTube

3. it completely removed all magnetism. Result!

IMG_1367.jpeg

Edited by neevo
  • Like 3
Posted

Unfortunately this device is not electrically safe and could not be sold in Europe (certainly Australia, too) legally. However no one cares.

It has no protecting earth connection while at the same time has a touchable metal part  - that you will touch 100% each time, the metal pusher!

Frank

 

  • Like 1
Posted
54 minutes ago, praezis said:

Unfortunately this device is not electrically safe and could not be sold in Europe (certainly Australia, too) legally. However no one cares.

It has no protecting earth connection while at the same time has a touchable metal part  - that you will touch 100% each time, the metal pusher!

Frank

 

Looks to me like the pusher is low voltage so isn't a problem.

Posted
6 minutes ago, praezis said:

Do you know the schematic?
But it doesn‘t matter anyways. It is unsafe.

Frank

You can see the input wires to a transformer and then full wave rectified so at low voltage and DC it's perfectly safe.

Posted

I am afraid you miss the problem totally🤔

Beyond, these devices use rectified mains voltage, which is doubled then (~600V). 
And a transformer is visible nowhere.

Frank

Posted
58 minutes ago, praezis said:

I am afraid you miss the problem totally🤔

Beyond, these devices use rectified mains voltage, which is doubled then (~600V). 
And a transformer is visible nowhere.

Frank

Sorry Frank, I don’t understand you here. There is a honking big transformer right slap bang in the middle of the unit.

 

Tom

Posted
25 minutes ago, praezis said:

Tom,
that is no transformer but the coil for demagnetizing. Note there are only 2 wires to it.

Frank

Looking further into the photo I suspect that they have just wired the primary of the transformer to be the magnetic coil. Looking at the remaining components there does look to be a rectifier cct of 4 diodes. Maybe the potted box at the bottom right corner is a capacitor (hefty one).  This would lead me to think this is some form of capacitive discharge cct. Not at all sure if there is any low voltage side with potentially 240V rectified going to the switch.

 

Tom

p.s. It’s a very long time since I have used my electronics education, last was 1985 on pump control systems mainly, surface to air missile and radar systems before that.

Posted

Frank- if one were to make this device at least safe-er, would adding a 3 wire cable and grounding at least the switch be worth the effort?

 

Thinking back, all the ancient demagnetizers I've had including my Greiner Magnomatic are ungrounded, but that one doesn't have any exposed metal.

Posted (edited)

I expected this would be a transformer with the rectifier diodes on it's output.

Be interested to know the voltage on the bottom of these diodes.

image.png.2d8cc5529b7c368501788c0e82570a25.png

Would also be interested to know what voltage this Cap & Relay are?

image.png.27cc5aa6e0b4cfce9b73c23bb1a32af6.png

Edit

Just realised from the number on the side of what I thought was a transformer is actually a polyester cap

Edited by AndyGSi
Posted
4 hours ago, praezis said:

Unfortunately this device is not electrically safe and could not be sold in Europe (certainly Australia, too) legally. However no one cares.

It has no protecting earth connection while at the same time has a touchable metal part  - that you will touch 100% each time, the metal pusher!

Frank

 

The Elma Antimag doesn't seem to be earthed either.

The metal switch problem can be easily rectified by using a all plastic switch.

Posted (edited)

Stewart,
simplest measure is to change the push switch against a full plastic one, of course qualified for safe handling voltage and current that is switched. Then the 2 wire mains cord would be ok.

Hector,
it doesn‘t have to as there are no touchable metal parts. 
Just recommended the same. But the chinese unit is released to the public still not safe.

Frank

Edited by praezis
Posted
12 hours ago, neevo said:

@JohnR725 the demagnetiser came in and here it is with the lid off. Nothing too crazy but looks like a transformer to generate the electrical field, a momentary switch and some electronics that I assume is doing the switching for the collapsing electrical field.

6 hours ago, praezis said:

Do you know the schematic?
But it doesn‘t matter anyways. It is unsafe.

2 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

The Elma Antimag doesn't seem to be earthed either.

what I was curious about is how closely does it resembled the Elma. I have one lurking around here is supposed to be fixing it just didn't quite get around to it. Then I know I posted the pictures on the discussion groups there lurking someplace. Then occasionally thinking about it yes it is a different circuit board because there is a rather live sizable he physically large motor starting capacitor that they were using the charge up to discharge through the coil.

Basically with any of these units you want to keep your fingers away from things. They usually charge up a capacitor with depending upon where you discharge and lethal voltages and then discharge it through the coil C as well be careful not to put your fingers in a place where it could go through you. Similar to the old photo flash circuits found in cameras you can charge up a really nasty voltage and those capacitors before it fires the flash tube. Or it's really amazing what you do with a couple of tiny batteries and a capacitor.

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
42 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

My knowledge of EE is limited, so I don't know whom is correct but instead of changing the switch to a plastic one, you could just push it with peg wood instead? 

I suppose you could get a meter and measure the voltage is on the switch itself as to whether it's a problem or not. Then a course you have to accept the fact that there's always going to be a catastrophic failure and you'd still have lethal voltages everywhere conceivably. Or you get creative and move the switch farther back into the box and put a plastic button to push so they basically are pegged would but isolate the switch from the outside if that was your concern. But I suspect if you look at a lot of the demagnetize and devices in the past and are worried about catastrophic failures well you probably shouldn't One for the most part. Through there are some really nice ones stuff is isolated were done much nicer but usually at a much much nicer price. Rall a price nice for the manufacturer not for the buyer as they tend to be expensive.

Posted
1 hour ago, JohnR725 said:

catastrophic failure and you'd still have lethal voltages everywhere conceivably

The most likely dangerous fault by far is one of the mains wires coming loose inside the unit and touching the chassis of the button. There's no other metal on the outside of this unit as far as I can see. I'd consider replacing the mains wire with one that carries ground and grounding the button chassis.

At least it's not as bad as the one I have... They sure didn't waste any money here.

IMG_7371.jpg

Posted
7 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

They used a metal oxide resistor instead of a carbon one.

Just measured the resistor to 891k. This is supposed to be a 5 % 1 M so it's out of spec. I'm guessing from the reject bin. Maybe the blue paint is just decorative, not indicative of quality...

Posted
10 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

Yes they did. They used a metal oxide resistor instead of a carbon one.

I will say for sure that the resistor and the LED are not needed for the function of the device, so they could  be saved in manufacture.

Posted
10 hours ago, AndyGSi said:

I suppose the first question should have been is it even a metal button?

I think everyone has assumed it is Andy unless they know for sure, but it does look like steel, the casing at least. Does plastic come in a steel/chrome colour 🤔.......👍.......😅

Screenshot_20241217-082441_Samsung Internet.jpg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Interesting, thanks for the detailed post. I saw one of those Swiss Nano machines a while back in another youtube video from  the Weiss Watch Company.
    • Hello and welcome to the fo4um. Enjoy
    • Welcome to the forum, enjoy.
    • You're asking a pretty broad question and you didn't specify the machine but yes it's simple especially if you have the right machine. The question has problems but I'll take it as it is. Is it really that simple yes especially if you have the right machine. So in the video below he's making a screw and yes it really is that simple but pay attention to the machine it is not simple at all probably wasn't cheap but it is small it will probably fit in your garage. Unfortunately wouldn't fit in my garage as it's far too cluttered up with things. In the video he talks about making a screw and pay attention to the machine. The machine has lots and lots and lots of cutters and lots of things to do lots of machining all-in-one machine conceivably one step after another all programmable. If you look at his channel lots of CNC's stuff and there are several other videos related to this machine. He goes to the factory where they talk about it and show all the other machines they make in Switzerland.  I did look up the specifications the machine I don't recall the price it's not going to cut wheels I think it has a maximum diameter around 11 mm basically it's really good for making small diameter watch parts. Then in one of the other videos he goes to a factory that used to make parts with waterpowered machinery been in business for 100 years and everything they now make is made with CNC machines including this one. What was interesting with the factory photo was that when they make some parts they can put them on a optical comparator comparator compares with whatever the reference is and the machine can be programmed to adjust its cutting to make sure everything is actually being made to specifications. Oh and then somewhere in all of this there was at least one picture of a balance staff can't have a CNC Swiss machine without making balance staffs.   It would be really nice if we had pictures of the machine. Then yes if you look at the page for wheel cutting you can enter parameters and it will generate a G code but he left out things? Notice he has a picture of a complete wheel but the G code isn't making a complete wheel it's only cutting the gear teeth I don't see whereas the program for crossing out the spokes? Typically when you see people cutting gears once the teeth are cut most the time the spokes are cut by hand. Occasionally someone will mill them out but typically not with the program which seems strange if you have CNC capability for instance one of my friends fill it used to design assembly line equipment or things to make things. So his hobby was to continue to make tools to make things like clocks. Very interesting and clever clocks but his true fund was making the machines to make the clocks. Then machine is not controlled by G code like we would typically find today as the stepping motor controller he has was made a long time ago and the individual controllers used a textbased program. So the company had a editor you could write a program to cause each the stepping motors to do something. So basically once you figure out how to cut a gear he would just change the parameters for different size gears so here's an example of a gear as you can see we have the teeth and the spokes. Then we have a picture the machine which sucks because it would've been so much nicer if I could've taken a picture when it was cutting a gears so we can see things better. Then yes there is a worm gear stepping motor indexing this is a mini lathe and the indexing is at the end of the lathe head hiding. The basic operation of this machine would be brass sheet not cut to a specific diameter size not even round mounted on the machine. Then it turns and a milling cutter will cut the diameter. Then the gear would be cut with a gear cutter. The same mill cutter for the diameter although conceivably change the size I don't know but basically the same milling for cutting the outer diameter would be used to cut the spokes. I really can't remember how he did the center hole but whatever it was was very precise.          
    • Yeah I know the site and the creator of it.  the two video clips are good examples of the quicker method and a full tear down.  the quick method will work in many cases. But not always and not for all the different movements.  I strongly suggest to not bend the four tabs as was done in the first clip.  Instead there are three tabs that insert into the top plate, Much saver way as to not break a tab.
×
×
  • Create New...