Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am a novice so please be patient.  I just completed a rebuild of a Seiko 6309a movement.  Cleaned, lubricated and installed a barrel arbor jewel set.  This is my initial trace.  I can see that the amplitude is quite low.  Is this OK?  if not where do I look to increase or do I start over?  Any suggestions would be appreciated.

IMG_6907.JPG

Posted
4 hours ago, Takeitapart said:

I am a novice so please be patient.  I just completed a rebuild of a Seiko 6309a movement.  Cleaned, lubricated and installed a barrel arbor jewel set.  This is my initial trace.  I can see that the amplitude is quite low.  Is this OK?  if not where do I look to increase or do I start over?  Any suggestions would be appreciated.

IMG_6907.JPG

Based on the limited information you provide I can only say that the amplitude is too low. As to the why: there's friction somewhere, but where? Not enough info and too many options I'm afraid.

Posted

It's impossible to answer without more information, so I have some questions for you.

Did you fully wind the watch to do this measurement?

Which position is the watch in?

Did you measure the other positions?

Did you do timegrapher readings before working on the watch?

What were the results?

You installed a barrel arbor jewel set. Not a simple job for a novice. Well done! Was it the correct Seiko part for this movement, from a reliable source?

Were the jewels installed correctly, clean and undamaged?

How much endshake does the barrel arbor have now?

  • Like 1
Posted

 

Thank you for the follow up.  I will try to answer the questions.

- Yes I believe the watch was fully wound and is face up.  Did not try in other positions.

-This watch was not running and has parts from other "donor" movements.

-The jewel set was from VTA online via ebay.  Installed per you tube video without difficulty.  I assume they were installed correctly.

-Not sure how to measure endshake.

 

mb

Posted

Update:  I disassembled the barrel train bridge and found some debris and cleaned it.  I rechecked the jewels that I had installed. No signs of damage and I confirmed the fit.  After reassembly I have an amplitude in the low 180's for every position.  The watch has been running about 36 hours on the last wind.   Not sure what to make of all of this???

 

mark  

Posted

At rebuild, after the initial half wind, did the pallet fork impulses react accordingly (with the balance still dismantled)? This is also to determine that at (very) low mainspring power the pallet fork already supplies the impulses. If not there is too much friction in the train wheel and/or the mainspring is weak.

Posted
21 hours ago, Takeitapart said:

-Not sure how to measure endshake.

End shake is the amount of  axial free end play of an arbour. Freedom to be moved up & down.

As a test, loosen all screws on barrel bridge two full turns,  you will be creating  some end shake, see if you immediately gain amplitude.

Make sure the barrel lid if fitted flush level with barrel wall, also that the click isn't rubbing on the lid.

Loosen screws to gear train bridge and observe the result, do the same on fork bridge and balance cock .

Rgds 

Posted
22 hours ago, Takeitapart said:

This watch was not running and has parts from other "donor" movements

which parts were changed and why?

On 11/11/2024 at 5:27 PM, Takeitapart said:

I am a novice so please be patient.  I just completed a rebuild of a Seiko 6309a movement.  Cleaned, lubricated

how did you lubricate the watch in particular the escapement?

Posted

Thanks for answering my questions. I started replying yesterday morning, but ran out of time. Now the situation has moved on quite a bit.

I think you already know this, but the amplitude is far too low. This indicates at least one problem in the train or escapement which you need to diagnose and solve. The possible causes are numerous, but include contamination, incorrect lubrication, or too much or too little freedom of movement. You have had a number of different suggestions about possible causes and how to test, all valid, but things get really complicated really quickly if you don't have a methodical approach.

I would suggest going right back to basics and testing the function of each individual component in the chain, starting with the barrel.

You can make videos and post them on Youtube then link from here if you need a second opinion.

 

Posted
16 hours ago, Takeitapart said:

I am sorry I am not sure I understand.

 

mb

With the balance still removed, you can observe the impuls stength, by flipping the and of the pallet fork and see the entry and exit motion of the fork pallets on the escape wheel (at a half turn of teh mainspring). If the fork after a small tick of a tweezer turns automatically to the other side, it is an idication that it works ok. If not, there could be too much friction in the wheel train.

Posted
16 hours ago, AndyGSi said:

Are you still using the old mainspring?

I think this is probably the most important point that @AndyGSihas asked to clear up first before trying to diagnose low amplitude, when we don't know if a 30/40 year old mainspring was used or not; so I'm wondering was a new mainspring used and if you did what size was it and what grease did you use on the barrel wall as braking grease?

I think starting at where the power emanates is a good place to look first in my experience

Posted
1 hour ago, GuyMontag said:

Does the 6309 have manual winding? I didn't think that it did.

You've got a point. I never thought to question if he'd got a full charge into the spring.

  • Like 1
Posted

I don’t why but I have found with Seiko watches certainly vintage amplitude always seems low..,However despite this they run well and keep good time.. Maybe they were designed this way..

 

  • Like 2
Posted

I lubricated according to the service manual. using primarily mobeus 9010.  the arbor an power train run smoothly.  I think at this time I will just start from the beginning.  Disassemble, clean and reassemble.  

 

MB

Posted

I have replaced the mainspring and arbor.  Cleaned balance and pivot.  The amplitude now fluctuates between 185 and 205 when sitting in a face up position.  not sure I understand why so much fluctuation in the same position??

 

mb

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Interesting, thanks for the detailed post. I saw one of those Swiss Nano machines a while back in another youtube video from  the Weiss Watch Company.
    • Hello and welcome to the fo4um. Enjoy
    • Welcome to the forum, enjoy.
    • You're asking a pretty broad question and you didn't specify the machine but yes it's simple especially if you have the right machine. The question has problems but I'll take it as it is. Is it really that simple yes especially if you have the right machine. So in the video below he's making a screw and yes it really is that simple but pay attention to the machine it is not simple at all probably wasn't cheap but it is small it will probably fit in your garage. Unfortunately wouldn't fit in my garage as it's far too cluttered up with things. In the video he talks about making a screw and pay attention to the machine. The machine has lots and lots and lots of cutters and lots of things to do lots of machining all-in-one machine conceivably one step after another all programmable. If you look at his channel lots of CNC's stuff and there are several other videos related to this machine. He goes to the factory where they talk about it and show all the other machines they make in Switzerland.  I did look up the specifications the machine I don't recall the price it's not going to cut wheels I think it has a maximum diameter around 11 mm basically it's really good for making small diameter watch parts. Then in one of the other videos he goes to a factory that used to make parts with waterpowered machinery been in business for 100 years and everything they now make is made with CNC machines including this one. What was interesting with the factory photo was that when they make some parts they can put them on a optical comparator comparator compares with whatever the reference is and the machine can be programmed to adjust its cutting to make sure everything is actually being made to specifications. Oh and then somewhere in all of this there was at least one picture of a balance staff can't have a CNC Swiss machine without making balance staffs.   It would be really nice if we had pictures of the machine. Then yes if you look at the page for wheel cutting you can enter parameters and it will generate a G code but he left out things? Notice he has a picture of a complete wheel but the G code isn't making a complete wheel it's only cutting the gear teeth I don't see whereas the program for crossing out the spokes? Typically when you see people cutting gears once the teeth are cut most the time the spokes are cut by hand. Occasionally someone will mill them out but typically not with the program which seems strange if you have CNC capability for instance one of my friends fill it used to design assembly line equipment or things to make things. So his hobby was to continue to make tools to make things like clocks. Very interesting and clever clocks but his true fund was making the machines to make the clocks. Then machine is not controlled by G code like we would typically find today as the stepping motor controller he has was made a long time ago and the individual controllers used a textbased program. So the company had a editor you could write a program to cause each the stepping motors to do something. So basically once you figure out how to cut a gear he would just change the parameters for different size gears so here's an example of a gear as you can see we have the teeth and the spokes. Then we have a picture the machine which sucks because it would've been so much nicer if I could've taken a picture when it was cutting a gears so we can see things better. Then yes there is a worm gear stepping motor indexing this is a mini lathe and the indexing is at the end of the lathe head hiding. The basic operation of this machine would be brass sheet not cut to a specific diameter size not even round mounted on the machine. Then it turns and a milling cutter will cut the diameter. Then the gear would be cut with a gear cutter. The same mill cutter for the diameter although conceivably change the size I don't know but basically the same milling for cutting the outer diameter would be used to cut the spokes. I really can't remember how he did the center hole but whatever it was was very precise.          
    • Yeah I know the site and the creator of it.  the two video clips are good examples of the quicker method and a full tear down.  the quick method will work in many cases. But not always and not for all the different movements.  I strongly suggest to not bend the four tabs as was done in the first clip.  Instead there are three tabs that insert into the top plate, Much saver way as to not break a tab.
×
×
  • Create New...