Jump to content

Wyler pocket watch / identifying movement


Recommended Posts

 Although movements put in pocket watches aren't in general small, diameter of the movement helps searching the right page for data.🧐  JohnR usually does that in a jiff.

Will you be kind enough to tell the diameter. 😩

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The size is 36mm or 1.42 inches. That seems to be equal to 16 lines, but what is the exact name of that caliber? I will have to find an escape wheel for that movement, but I can't find any reference to a Wyler 16.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I was looking earlier on, I did find a "Wyler 16" movement, but it is very different to yours. In the article it said that one was the only fully in-house Wyler movement?

That implies yours is based on another makers movement, with Wylers customisation, but I cannot find any with the same keyless details so far.. That yoke is strange and distinctive!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, rjenkinsgb said:

When I was looking earlier on, I did find a "Wyler 16" movement, but it is very different to yours. In the article it said that one was the only fully in-house Wyler movement?

That implies yours is based on another makers movement, with Wylers customisation, but I cannot find any with the same keyless details so far.. That yoke is strange and distinctive!

You're right : it seems that Wyler has used ETA and AS movements and modified them. I will continue searching which one could be mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, BlueHarp said:

The size is 36mm or 1.42 inches. That seems to be equal to 16 lines, but what is the exact name of that caliber? I will have to find an escape wheel for that movement, but I can't find any reference to a Wyler 16.

if you scroll down the page far enough you'll see a reference to Wyler 17. Because of the age it's too early for the bestfit book and even another book I looked at the 50s didn't have it listed.

https://uhrforum.de/threads/wyler-incassable-ca-1935-aussen-bauhaus-stilikone-innen-technisch-eigenwillig.383435/

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's looks exactly like my movement! The link you mentionned is in german, but I understand that nobody is sure about the fact that Wyler created that calibre. It might be another manufacturer's movement which has been modified. So finding the right escape wheel will be miraculous.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, BlueHarp said:

It might be another manufacturer's movement which has been modified

As with my ETA 2783 which is modified with a Wyler balance and there are plenty of parts for the ETA 2783 available. Now it may be a matter of finding who made the movement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you. Unfortunately, I'm totally unable to do that. As a last resort, I've posted on the section "Watch Parts, Sourcing Parts, Movements, Materials and Lubrication Products" with as many photos as possible.

Wait and see ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This 16 lin. is the only movement showing up in the books - a good evidence it is a genuine Wyler, not relabelled.

The name? „Wyler 16 lin.“ 😀

16 minutes ago, BlueHarp said:

Thank you. Unfortunately, I'm totally unable to do that.

There are certain people who can do it for you …

Frank

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, BlueHarp said:

It might be another manufacturer's movement which has been modified.

one of the interesting problems and watch repair is who made your watch? It's why books like bestfit exist. Companies purchase basically oem movements and have their name put on them case them up and sell them as their own and they been doing this for a very long time. bestfit allow you to hopefully cross reference all of the various watches for parts. Plus companies like bestfit will sell the parts with their own part numbers and tell you which watches they'll fit.

For instance here's an example of a company Rolex they purchase their movements up until 2004 where they finally purchase the company that made their movements.

https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/resources/aegler-became-rolex-movement-maker.html

so yes you're movement was probably manufactured by another company that very likely we may never know who they are.

7 hours ago, nevenbekriev said:

Actually this is a matter of repivoting. This is the easiest, the fastest and may be the only way to make the watch work again. Well, the other way is making new pinion, but it is much harder.

then we have the unfortunate reality of working on vintage watches even if we somehow can identify the watch where exactly would you purchase the part from? One of the biggest problems with watch repairs getting spare parts for even newer watches anything vintage is going to be extremely problematic. Anything that's not easy to identify becomes problematic. The reason for this is if you can't identify the watch somebody on eBay selling parts for watch they scrapped will have a hard time describing whatever it is they're trying to sell

this means the only way you can do vintage watches you have to have enough tools to do things like re-pivoting.

then this problem was recognized a long time ago when this kind of thing was more common in other words no reference books no spare parts they were generic things like pinion wire. this is just pieces of long pinions with no pivots because you get to do the final steps of manufacturing and attach it to your wheel.

then because you lack the manufacturing capabilities the only other solution is to set up an active search on eBay for that type of pocket watch. Then your end up with either a complete watch or maybe if you're lucky that might be somebody selling the parts or broken watch you never know what will show up on eBay sooner or later.

Edited by JohnR725
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi All, I started this forum over 10 years ago and never intended for it to me a 'for profit' concern. Since then, I launched an online course and I draw funds from that business in order to fund this website. There is also a little bit of funding from Google ads but I don't rely on it because they keep changing the goalposts. The forum costs a few hundred pounds per month to run and Im comfortably managing it. Why a few hundred pounds? I am OCD about backups and not relying on a single company to host those backups, I use amazon S3 to backup hourly and daily, I also use Digital Ocean. I use a separate mail service to handle the serious amounts of emails sent from the site, I am on here most days admin'ing and updating the site or servers/applying security patches and the like - its not a big deal, I enjoy it. In short - you might not see me a lot posting (for my sanity as it's addictive (same on all my social media)) but I certainly do a lot behind the scenes. I can't control my mortality and so there's always that - but other than that, I'm damn committed to this site as I am committed to my commercial site watchfix.com which supports this site. I have no interest in shutting down, selling or otherwise changing this sites format. Having said that, if anyone wants to consider taking on moderation tasks to help (in particular, making sure people post in the correct place and moderating new members posts) that would be very helpful. (Only members who have been active for more than a year please). Finally, thanks very much for your support and kind words - I truly appreciate that. This forum has to be one of the friendliest I am part of - a massive refreshment after reading some of the Facebook groups I'm part of - except mine FB group - that's also great with great people 😄😉    
    • Demagnetize it first and the tools you are using. Get yourself a tin of  Ronsonol lighter fluid. A small jar with a screw on lid. Put the balance in that for a few minutes, get some tissue paper put the balance on that then dry with you bench blower, oil both staff pivots and put it back in the movement. This is what I always used to do never had any problems. I have tried one dip and it was rubbish a waste of money. Ronsonol is very friendly to shellac so no worries there.   
    • Thats not the issue Sam, the forum is very popular and well known among in the watch world. The issue is anything can change at any time, my life and anyone else's could be changed dramatically in an instant, mine just has which partly prompted the start of the this thread.
    • Thanks for your feedback guys. I gave the watch (what I consider to be) a full wind and will check the power reserve. I think the last time I tried, it ran for at least 48 hours so this will take a while. As the watch IS running I think the arbor IS attached to the main spring. I was suspecting that maybe the main spring is slipping inside the barrel much like it would in an automatic watch. 
    • We don't think the forum is on trouble, we just don't want to lose it or contact with each other.  As you new member you are still important. 
×
×
  • Create New...