Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Let me start off by saying that I am brand new to watch repair so I don’t yet understand most of the correct terminology. I’ll do my best to describe what I am talking about and I’ll include pictures where possible.  Here’s my issue.  I am repairing a 1982 Chronosport Atlantis 20 ATM Quartz 1127.   I was having trouble with the stem.  When I pulled it all the way out to set the time, the hands and date wheel would always turn together.  It felt very rough as if something was broken.  I completely disassembled the watch and found a loose piece of plastic jammed in the keyless works.  I was able to determine that the piece of plastic was actually a small post that had broken off the plastic frame.  The post had been a pivot point for a lever in the keyless works.  I’m not quite sure what the lever does yet.  It appears that although the post was gone, the lever stayed in place, perhaps rotating on the the small nub that remained.  My question is, can I fix that post.  Is there a technique to glue it back in place?  I understand that the keyless works parts experience significant stress as a result of the movement and function of the stem.  Please see the pictures attached and let me know if you have any ideas. See the circled items in the three pics.  Thanks from Delaware, USA.  
 

IMG_4657.jpeg

IMG_1741.jpeg

IMG_7239.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/18/2024 at 6:20 AM, Latetothegame said:

 I am repairing a 1982 Chronosport Atlantis 20 ATM Quartz 1127.

one of the confusions for people new to watch repair is what are they working on? Yes you have a description up above but that is not helpful as we need to know who actually made the watch itself. In other words companies purchase movements and put their names on them so we need a picture of the watch movement itself from the backside to identify the watch.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Latetothegame has posted about this watch before, it just might be a lot easier to replace the works than repair that post, your movement looks to be quartz, the Chronosport I saw had an ETA 555.11? so could be ETA, Ronda, I do not understand why a movement model number or picture of said works is scarce?, one can only help with more info or drill the post out and go from there.....

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, first let me apologize for the delay in responding to the several comments that I received.  Thank you for taking the time to offer your advice and thoughts on potential paths to solve my problem.  In my continued search for a solution I stumbled upon a video that described the process of properly identifying the manufacturer and movement number.  I followed the directions, disassembled the watch and found the information I needed.  The movement is an ESA 944.111. During the process of identifying the manufacturer, I also identified an additional problem with the plastic base plate.  I came to the conclusion, as Cyclops had suggested, that I would probably be better off replacing the movement if it was available.  l was able to locate a supplier on EBay who had three new ESA 944.111 movements in stock .  The supplier is Migma Watches located in Germany.  They were kind enough to pull one of the movements and put a battery in it to confirm that it was working.  I bought it and it is on the way.   I would have preferred to have repaired the original as I have owned this watch for 42 years but I’m quite happy to just get it functioning again.  I should be able to get it up and running in no time once the movement arrives. The rest of the watch is in very good condition.  Thanks again for your help!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

glad it worked out, those ESA movements are obsolete but new old stock is still out there, now that you know the make/model you could also do a cross reference to see if something more current would line up with the dial feet and hands...for future use if needed 👍

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/28/2024 at 2:14 AM, Latetothegame said:

So, first let me apologize for the delay in responding to the several comments that I received.  Thank you for taking the time to offer your advice and thoughts on potential paths to solve my problem.  In my continued search for a solution I stumbled upon a video that described the process of properly identifying the manufacturer and movement number.  I followed the directions, disassembled the watch and found the information I needed.  The movement is an ESA 944.111. During the process of identifying the manufacturer, I also identified an additional problem with the plastic base plate.  I came to the conclusion, as Cyclops had suggested, that I would probably be better off replacing the movement if it was available.  l was able to locate a supplier on EBay who had three new ESA 944.111 movements in stock .  The supplier is Migma Watches located in Germany.  They were kind enough to pull one of the movements and put a battery in it to confirm that it was working.  I bought it and it is on the way.   I would have preferred to have repaired the original as I have owned this watch for 42 years but I’m quite happy to just get it functioning again.  I should be able to get it up and running in no time once the movement arrives. The rest of the watch is in very good condition.  Thanks again for your help!

Now that you have a replacement on the way, no reason not to attempt a repair on the original. Drill out what remains and glue in a new post, any material of the correct diameter to fit the hole and an adhesive that will accommodate both materials. You will need some magnification to complete the task.

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Latetothegame said:

Repairing the post is a great idea.  I can learn a new skill with nothing to lose.  Thanks for the suggestion Neverenoughwatches.  I may get that original movement fixed yet.  

 

5 minutes ago, Latetothegame said:

Repairing the post is a great idea.  I can learn a new skill with nothing to lose.  Thanks for the suggestion Neverenoughwatches.  I may get that original movement fixed yet.  

Measure the diameter if possible of what remains of the post and check that against the hole in the setting lever. If you are to attempt drilling out, drill undersize then gradually increase the hole with a smoothing broach, the post needs to be the same size as the original with a tight friction fit in the hole.The repair may last it may not, it is a repair to plastic after all. A hot weld of the joint would probably work better than an adhesive .

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I received the ESA 944.111 movement today from Germany.  I successfully reassembled the watch with the new movement and everything is working perfectly.  I realize that this is very basic work for those of you who have helped me with your comments but I have to say it was extremely rewarding to bring a 42 year old watch with sentimental value back to life after being broken for 19 years.  I also have to say, it was not quite as straightforward as I imagined .  As always I learned a lot so that it’ll be easier next time.  On to the next project.  
Thanks to everyone for your help.
 

IMG_1972.png

Edited by Latetothegame
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/4/2024 at 3:05 AM, Latetothegame said:

I received the ESA 944.111 movement today from Germany.  I successfully reassembled the watch with the new movement and everything is working perfectly.  I realize that this is very basic work for those of you who have helped me with your comments but I have to say it was extremely rewarding to bring a 42 year old watch with sentimental value back to life after being broken for 19 years.  I also have to say, it was not quite as straightforward as I imagined .  As always I learned a lot so that it’ll be easier next time.  On to the next project.  
Thanks to everyone for your help.
 

IMG_1972.png

Well done, there is more to changing a movement than a beginner might think. Careful placing of hands, synchronisation of the date change over with the correct time of day, did you remember that first time 🙂 . Fitting the dial to the movement, precise fitting of the movement ring, releasing and installing the stem. All daunting tasks to a first timer so well done, onto to the next one 👍

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You nailed it.  Great list of the potential land mines that I had to navigate reassembling the watch. I’m happy to say that for the most part, I managed them all correctly.  I watched several YouTube videos of experienced people reassembling watches.  That helped immensely.  There was a reasonably obvious stem release bottom close to the path of the stem so I was able to get that right first time.  The dial feet fit into the holes perfectly.  I did attempt to put the movement into the ring backwards for about 5 minutes but I eventually figured that out. I remembered to turn the stem without the hands on to the exact point where the calendar changed dates.  Then I set the hour and minute hand to midnight.  I rotated the hands 12 hours to ensure there were no collisions. Then I added the seconds hand.  I put the case on and reinserted the stem and everything worked.  For a while.  Then the movement stopped at 11:10 pm.  That gave me a little bit of a sick feeling.  However, I eventually figured out that when I added the seconds hand I must have inadvertently pushed the hour hand down a little and it eventually clanked against the side of the Chronosport appliqué on the dial.  So, take everything apart, fix, reassemble.  It’s been working ever since though!  
ONE QUESTION, if anyone knows the answer.  I have since learned that some watches REQUIRE that the stem be removed in a specific position.  Some wind, some date, some hand change.  I may have screwed that up.  Apparently you can do serious damage to the keyless works pulling the stem in the wrong position.  Honestly I’m not sure where it was when I pulled it out or put it back.  Does anyone know the correct position to remove the stem on an ESA 944.111?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You're thinking metal to jewel in general I guess. Maybe it would be a good idea to peg the pallet jewel hole on the main plate after the epilame treatment. I think that could work as it is my impression that the epilame doesn't sit very hard, but I could be wrong about that so feel free to educate me. I didn't remember that 9501 was thixotropic (thanks for the link). That would mean it's even runnier during impact (lower viscosity) so perhaps it's time I get some fresh grease as mine seems a bit too runny. What I have seen is a whitish surface after washing but it goes away if I scrub the surface with a brush in a degreaser (Horosolv). I don't think it embeds itself in the metal but sticks very hard to the metal. I don't worry too much about the cleaning solution. I just want perfectly clean parts and my solution can be replaced for little money (ELMA RED 1:9). Anyway, I quite often need "to strip back and rebuild" and scrubbing parts by hand isn't exactly the most stimulating part of a service.
    • I’ve had a couple movements where it is clear the previous watchmaker was diligent with lubrication but the old epilam had turned to a fine white powder covering the pallet fork and keyless parts, which can’t be good for parts. I’m spare with epi since I don’t know how long it takes to degrade to that state…
    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar.  I think its because it gets into their cleaning solutions Mike. Theirs or anyone else's that services the watch next time, or if they need to strip back and rebuild. Could preclean but thats all time for a pro. I thought the idea was for the epilame to create a barrier, a wall between the lubrication and anything else, so the lube cant spread.
    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
    • I think attaching a nut to the lid to pull it off is the least destructive, any damage damage on the outside is going to an easier fix than any created when trying to push it out from the inside. Scratching up the inside of the lid , mainspring or arbor bearing will be risk. Just my opinion.
×
×
  • Create New...