Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Let me start off by saying that I am brand new to watch repair so I don’t yet understand most of the correct terminology. I’ll do my best to describe what I am talking about and I’ll include pictures where possible.  Here’s my issue.  I am repairing a 1982 Chronosport Atlantis 20 ATM Quartz 1127.   I was having trouble with the stem.  When I pulled it all the way out to set the time, the hands and date wheel would always turn together.  It felt very rough as if something was broken.  I completely disassembled the watch and found a loose piece of plastic jammed in the keyless works.  I was able to determine that the piece of plastic was actually a small post that had broken off the plastic frame.  The post had been a pivot point for a lever in the keyless works.  I’m not quite sure what the lever does yet.  It appears that although the post was gone, the lever stayed in place, perhaps rotating on the the small nub that remained.  My question is, can I fix that post.  Is there a technique to glue it back in place?  I understand that the keyless works parts experience significant stress as a result of the movement and function of the stem.  Please see the pictures attached and let me know if you have any ideas. See the circled items in the three pics.  Thanks from Delaware, USA.  
 

IMG_4657.jpeg

IMG_1741.jpeg

IMG_7239.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/18/2024 at 6:20 AM, Latetothegame said:

 I am repairing a 1982 Chronosport Atlantis 20 ATM Quartz 1127.

one of the confusions for people new to watch repair is what are they working on? Yes you have a description up above but that is not helpful as we need to know who actually made the watch itself. In other words companies purchase movements and put their names on them so we need a picture of the watch movement itself from the backside to identify the watch.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Latetothegame has posted about this watch before, it just might be a lot easier to replace the works than repair that post, your movement looks to be quartz, the Chronosport I saw had an ETA 555.11? so could be ETA, Ronda, I do not understand why a movement model number or picture of said works is scarce?, one can only help with more info or drill the post out and go from there.....

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, first let me apologize for the delay in responding to the several comments that I received.  Thank you for taking the time to offer your advice and thoughts on potential paths to solve my problem.  In my continued search for a solution I stumbled upon a video that described the process of properly identifying the manufacturer and movement number.  I followed the directions, disassembled the watch and found the information I needed.  The movement is an ESA 944.111. During the process of identifying the manufacturer, I also identified an additional problem with the plastic base plate.  I came to the conclusion, as Cyclops had suggested, that I would probably be better off replacing the movement if it was available.  l was able to locate a supplier on EBay who had three new ESA 944.111 movements in stock .  The supplier is Migma Watches located in Germany.  They were kind enough to pull one of the movements and put a battery in it to confirm that it was working.  I bought it and it is on the way.   I would have preferred to have repaired the original as I have owned this watch for 42 years but I’m quite happy to just get it functioning again.  I should be able to get it up and running in no time once the movement arrives. The rest of the watch is in very good condition.  Thanks again for your help!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

glad it worked out, those ESA movements are obsolete but new old stock is still out there, now that you know the make/model you could also do a cross reference to see if something more current would line up with the dial feet and hands...for future use if needed 👍

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/28/2024 at 2:14 AM, Latetothegame said:

So, first let me apologize for the delay in responding to the several comments that I received.  Thank you for taking the time to offer your advice and thoughts on potential paths to solve my problem.  In my continued search for a solution I stumbled upon a video that described the process of properly identifying the manufacturer and movement number.  I followed the directions, disassembled the watch and found the information I needed.  The movement is an ESA 944.111. During the process of identifying the manufacturer, I also identified an additional problem with the plastic base plate.  I came to the conclusion, as Cyclops had suggested, that I would probably be better off replacing the movement if it was available.  l was able to locate a supplier on EBay who had three new ESA 944.111 movements in stock .  The supplier is Migma Watches located in Germany.  They were kind enough to pull one of the movements and put a battery in it to confirm that it was working.  I bought it and it is on the way.   I would have preferred to have repaired the original as I have owned this watch for 42 years but I’m quite happy to just get it functioning again.  I should be able to get it up and running in no time once the movement arrives. The rest of the watch is in very good condition.  Thanks again for your help!

Now that you have a replacement on the way, no reason not to attempt a repair on the original. Drill out what remains and glue in a new post, any material of the correct diameter to fit the hole and an adhesive that will accommodate both materials. You will need some magnification to complete the task.

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Latetothegame said:

Repairing the post is a great idea.  I can learn a new skill with nothing to lose.  Thanks for the suggestion Neverenoughwatches.  I may get that original movement fixed yet.  

 

5 minutes ago, Latetothegame said:

Repairing the post is a great idea.  I can learn a new skill with nothing to lose.  Thanks for the suggestion Neverenoughwatches.  I may get that original movement fixed yet.  

Measure the diameter if possible of what remains of the post and check that against the hole in the setting lever. If you are to attempt drilling out, drill undersize then gradually increase the hole with a smoothing broach, the post needs to be the same size as the original with a tight friction fit in the hole.The repair may last it may not, it is a repair to plastic after all. A hot weld of the joint would probably work better than an adhesive .

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I received the ESA 944.111 movement today from Germany.  I successfully reassembled the watch with the new movement and everything is working perfectly.  I realize that this is very basic work for those of you who have helped me with your comments but I have to say it was extremely rewarding to bring a 42 year old watch with sentimental value back to life after being broken for 19 years.  I also have to say, it was not quite as straightforward as I imagined .  As always I learned a lot so that it’ll be easier next time.  On to the next project.  
Thanks to everyone for your help.
 

IMG_1972.png

Edited by Latetothegame
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/4/2024 at 3:05 AM, Latetothegame said:

I received the ESA 944.111 movement today from Germany.  I successfully reassembled the watch with the new movement and everything is working perfectly.  I realize that this is very basic work for those of you who have helped me with your comments but I have to say it was extremely rewarding to bring a 42 year old watch with sentimental value back to life after being broken for 19 years.  I also have to say, it was not quite as straightforward as I imagined .  As always I learned a lot so that it’ll be easier next time.  On to the next project.  
Thanks to everyone for your help.
 

IMG_1972.png

Well done, there is more to changing a movement than a beginner might think. Careful placing of hands, synchronisation of the date change over with the correct time of day, did you remember that first time 🙂 . Fitting the dial to the movement, precise fitting of the movement ring, releasing and installing the stem. All daunting tasks to a first timer so well done, onto to the next one 👍

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You nailed it.  Great list of the potential land mines that I had to navigate reassembling the watch. I’m happy to say that for the most part, I managed them all correctly.  I watched several YouTube videos of experienced people reassembling watches.  That helped immensely.  There was a reasonably obvious stem release bottom close to the path of the stem so I was able to get that right first time.  The dial feet fit into the holes perfectly.  I did attempt to put the movement into the ring backwards for about 5 minutes but I eventually figured that out. I remembered to turn the stem without the hands on to the exact point where the calendar changed dates.  Then I set the hour and minute hand to midnight.  I rotated the hands 12 hours to ensure there were no collisions. Then I added the seconds hand.  I put the case on and reinserted the stem and everything worked.  For a while.  Then the movement stopped at 11:10 pm.  That gave me a little bit of a sick feeling.  However, I eventually figured out that when I added the seconds hand I must have inadvertently pushed the hour hand down a little and it eventually clanked against the side of the Chronosport appliqué on the dial.  So, take everything apart, fix, reassemble.  It’s been working ever since though!  
ONE QUESTION, if anyone knows the answer.  I have since learned that some watches REQUIRE that the stem be removed in a specific position.  Some wind, some date, some hand change.  I may have screwed that up.  Apparently you can do serious damage to the keyless works pulling the stem in the wrong position.  Honestly I’m not sure where it was when I pulled it out or put it back.  Does anyone know the correct position to remove the stem on an ESA 944.111?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think attaching a nut to the lid to pull it off is the least destructive, any damage damage on the outside is going to an easier fix than any created when trying to push it out from the inside. Scratching up the inside of the lid , mainspring or arbor bearing will be risk. Just my opinion.
    • yes the things we read in the universe I did see some where it was either difficult to clean off or it contaminated the cleaning fluid there was some issue with cleaning. I was trying to remember something about grease where as opposed to a substance of a specific consistency they were suggesting it had a base oil with something to thicken it. That conceivably could indicate that the two could separate and that would be an issue. But there is something else going on here that I had remembered so I have a link below and the description of the 9501 notice the word that I highlighted? Notice that word appears quite a bit on this particular page like 9415 has that property all so they 8200 mainspring grease and that definitely has to be mixed up when you go to use it because it definitely separates. just in case you didn't remember that nifty word there is a Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thixotropy   https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases I wonder if what you're seeing is the boron nitride left behind after cleaning. In other words it's the high-pressure part of the grease and it's probably embedding itself into the metal which is why it doesn't clean off and shouldn't be a problem?
    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
    • Hi not found one either yet,  close relative is the 436 and 4361 according to ranff.db.   It gives quire a lot of detail but not as good as the old site.      RANFF.DB.
    • No problem to replace the setting with the staking set. Press the new setting from inside, use flat face punch with hole. The punch must be wider than the setting, the hole to be as not to press at the stone, but only on the bush. Press by hand until the setting gets flush with the plate surface, so the punch must rest on it.
×
×
  • Create New...