Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hey all watch peeps, are we all well. So i went and did something silly, but we do silly things when we are in love. And I fell in love with this and now i dont know what to with her but she's gorgeous. She's an A3 Boley and Leinen production lathe from the 40's. Yes i know too big for watchmaking maybe unless i can get hold of some 15mm collets for her to munch on. But just think of all the other things i can make ?   Ideas anyone ?  😅

Screenshot_20230918-080634_eBay.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Hey all watch peeps, are we all well. So i went and did something silly, but we do silly things when we are in love. And I fell in love with this and now i dont know what to with her but she's gorgeous. She's an A3 Boley and Leinen production lathe from the 40's. Yes i know too big for watchmaking maybe unless i can get hold of some 15mm collets for her to munch on. But just think of all the other things i can make ?   Ideas anyone ?  😅

 

Just imagine all the stuff you can make to use on your baby lathe. 😂

Tom

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, oldhippy said:

With a lathe that big you need to take up clock making. 

Haha yep OH its what i call future Endeavor buying, just thinking ahead with my eyesight. I wanted something bigger ,Its above what i  really was after but at such a good buy only a touch over 200  as its a collection only and 40miles from me, i though an absolute bargain. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

That's almost a give away price. 

I know H the starting price was 200, i knew someone would at least bid that plus a bit more. I made my max 302 and was quite surprised at it finishing up at 209. They are compared at least in size to  the Myford ML7 and these are knocking out at 12 -15  hundred. So i can only guess its worth roughly a grand. I will need some help sourcing some generic 15mm collets and a draw bar, i expect the originals are like rocking horseshit, so if anyone has ideas, much appreciated you guys.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, tomh207 said:

Just imagine all the stuff you can make

Actually the Lathe is big enough to make a watch. It should be big enough to turn the watch plates which sometimes would be hard to do with a smaller Lathe.

Then the link below might have some useful information somewhere

http://www.lathes.co.uk/boley/

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, markr said:

First thing you should build is a snap on back for my 1955 P812 LeCoultre.

Ok, but first thing i should do before first thing i should build is figure out how it works. Hopefully picking it up next Monday as long as nothing goes pear-shaped. I want to pay cash on collection for it, Epay frown very much on this idea, i guess they worry about not getting their ( hard earned 🤣 ) commission. Messages between buyer and seller containing addresses are strictly monitored. 

1 hour ago, JohnR725 said:

Actually the Lathe is big enough to make a watch. It should be big enough to turn the watch plates which sometimes would be hard to do with a smaller Lathe.

Then the link below might have some useful information somewhere

http://www.lathes.co.uk/boley/

 

Thanks John, thats were i got some of my information yesterday on the A3 model. I've been searching for the 15mm collets since then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Out of interest the watchmaker's wolf cross slides I've been tailing on ebay for the past few months have been more than i paid for Big Bertha. 

Yeah, tell me about it, I ended up paying most of the lathe cost for one mate. 😢

 

Tom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Haha i remember,  you got all caught up in a bidding frenzy and it was going to be yours no matter what 😅

Funnier though is all the WJ cross slides I have seen since go for considerably more than I paid so buyer’s remorse has eased somewhat 😂

 

Tom

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

As i dont know much about metal working lathes i have the question of, does precision wane as the lathe gets bigger ? Or just the ability to make smaller things ?

No, it just becomes less convenient to make smaller things. I have a Schaublin 102, comparable to your Leinen there, and have made many parts for customers on it with tolerances of +- 3 microns. But if the part can be made more coveniently on my little Leinen (50mm center height, "standard" watchmaker lathe), I do it there. When the part diameter gets above what I can hold in a collet on the little Leinen (around 6mm), it goes to the Schaublin usually.

 

There are larger (10-11" swing) lathes that can easily hold the precision or better than the best watchmaker lathes, for example the Monarch 10ee or Hardinge HLV-H. In many ways the extra stability and mass of the larger machines makes higher precision easier.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

No, it just becomes less convenient to make smaller things. I have a Schaublin 102, comparable to your Leinen there, and have made many parts for customers on it with tolerances of +- 3 microns. But if the part can be made more coveniently on my little Leinen (50mm center height, "standard" watchmaker lathe), I do it there. When the part diameter gets above what I can hold in a collet on the little Leinen (around 6mm), it goes to the Schaublin usually.

 

There are larger (10-11" swing) lathes that can easily hold the precision or better than the best watchmaker lathes, for example the Monarch 10ee or Hardinge HLV-H. In many ways the extra stability and mass of the larger machines makes higher precision easier.

Thanks Nicklesilver,  thats instilled me with some confidence with my use of it.  The entire  buy was cheaper than a just cross slide for the watchmaker's lathe. Hopefully i come across some collets for it, so far the literature I've found states a maximum holding of 8mm, i thought it would be much higher from a 15mm collet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

I don't know much about lathes but could a collet be made on one? 

I was thinking the same, potentially maybe but likely not within my capability or the lathe's. The collet has to be accurately bored, shaped to fit the cone, keywayed and threaded. Not sure how the collet would be split either They would also need to be hardened way beyond something amateurish i could attempt .

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Thanks Nicklesilver,  thats instilled me with some confidence with my use of it.  The entire  buy was cheaper than a just cross slide for the watchmaker's lathe. Hopefully i come across some collets for it, so far the literature I've found states a maximum holding of 8mm, i thought it would be much higher from a 15mm collet. 

There's the through-bore size and the reduced bore size. On a Schaublin w12 collet, 12mm body, max through is 8mm, but they're pushing it. On a standard Swiss 8mm collet it's 4mm, for most other 8mm it's 5mm. A w20 collet, 20mm body, it's 14mm. So 8mm through bore for a 15 mm collet is about right. On my little lathe (8mm collet), I can fit 6mm rod in a reduced bore collet 12-15mm deep. So in some cases, where maybe I want to make a part with an OD of 10mm, but work it in my Leinen, I'll turn a 6mm spigot on the stock on the 102, then hold it for final working in the Leinen.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

There's the through-bore size and the reduced bore size. On a Schaublin w12 collet, 12mm body, max through is 8mm, but they're pushing it. On a standard Swiss 8mm collet it's 4mm, for most other 8mm it's 5mm. A w20 collet, 20mm body, it's 14mm. So 8mm through bore for a 15 mm collet is about right. On my little lathe (8mm collet), I can fit 6mm rod in a reduced bore collet 12-15mm deep. So in some cases, where maybe I want to make a part with an OD of 10mm, but work it in my Leinen, I'll turn a 6mm spigot on the stock on the 102, then hold it for final working in the Leinen.

Thanks for the information Nicklesilver. Whats the minimum rod you would  chuck up in an adjustable if you had to . This thing has a new 80 mm 3 jaw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK, a little bit more from today's lecture about the main springs. Generally, the spring in the barrel is limited and can't  unwind fully. With the blue line is shown the reserve/torque relation when spring unwinding is limited by the barrel. The green line represents the same when the spring is free to unwind fully And the red line shows the minimum torque that is needed for the movement to keep running. The yelow graph shows how the torque changes (from the blue) when the spring gets weaker (set) after 100 years of work. The purple line represents thinner and longer spring in the same barrel. As You can see, using thinner and longer spring will increase the power reserve. The 'set' spring will have the same reserve as a new one with the same sizes, only the amplitude will be just a little smaller.  Of course, this is true only when the movement othervice is in good health ( the red line is lo enough)
    • As long as you don't grind the stuff up and blow it around, you should be fine. Use a dust mask if in doubt.   The things I'm very careful of are: Radium lume - even the stuff that is visually completely dead and inert is still highly radioactive; it's the fluorescent part that decays, not the radium. A single speck inhaled or ingested can cause cancer, so store parts in zip bags and wear a dust mask & wipe your work area down after handling anything that uses it. A proper geiger counter is a good investment if you plan on working with vintage watches, so you can check for it & take appropriate precautions.   "One dip" & equivalents - the original type & the generic PERC dry cleaning fluid (Tetrachloroethylene / perchloroethylene) which is what the original one dip was mostly made of. That's toxic, a known carcinogen. Use in very good ventilation only & keep it sealed whenever possible.   The newer B-Dip is presumably a safer replacement.  
    • Only 137% !  sounds like you're not putting enough effort in 😆.  I would think of it like cogs on pushbike.  Fastest speed to the spindle would be largest pulley wheel on the drive and smallest pulley wheel on the driven. If the motor was into a sliding bed you would have 3x4 ? Speeds.
    • So please we have that comment.    Eccentric59.  Great work.
    • Thanks @nevenbekriev. I did some further reading and I think I kinda understand it now. Basically, if you were to fully fill the entire barrel with a super-long mainspring, you can't actually wind it anymore. Hence zero power reserve. Likewise the other extreme (mainspring too short to be wound around the arbor). This explains in very basic turns why there is a sweet spot in the middle of the curve you drew. Importantly, this is relative to the barrel diameter (and arbor diameter). In other words, if you have a larger barrel you should have a longer mainspring and hence also longer power reserve. So Longines' statement isn't entirely wrong (longer mainspring = more power reserve). BUT you can only make the mainspring longer if you also increase the barrel diameter. Thanks again for making me think about this a bit more and learning something. That's why I love this forum!   However 😉, there is still some truth to what I said (I think! Please correct me if I'm wrong!): according to my reading, the key parameter is the share of the space between barrel arbor and barrel wall. Half of which should be occupied by the mainspring (based on Theory of Horology by WOSTEP, quote in depth here: https://www.vintagewatchstraps.com/mainsprings.php).  The space occupied by the mainspring in the barrel is a simple function of mainspring length AND thickness.  This implies that increasing length, but keeping the same thickness, will lead to occupying too much of the barrel space and hence reducing power reserve. This is what @nevenbekriev 's drawing correctly shows. However, if you increase length AND decrease thickness in the correct ratio, you can maintain the correct mainspring proportion vis-a-vis the barrel (i.e. occupying half of the space between arbor and barrel wall).  This would indeed lead to an increase of the number of barrel revolutions (when unwinding) and hence a potential increase in power reserve. However, you loose torque. And a loss of torque will also lead to the watch stopping earlier (when torque can't overcome the friction in the gear train). Thus, these two opposing effects may cancel each other out. Which again makes this statement probably true:    FINALLY, we still want to help @Zendoc with his very concrete decision:  GR4485 (same thickness but shorter than original) or GR4477 (slightly thinner and a bit longer than original).  I would still advocate (considering modern lubricants and potentially stronger metal alloys -- and consequently the risk of knocking at full wind) to choose the latter.        
×
×
  • Create New...