Jump to content

Enicar Intermediate Wheel Upside Down?


Recommended Posts

I just stripped an Enicar AR 160 ready to clean and put back together, when taking it apart I noticed that the intermediate wheel was installed with the chamfer facing up (see pictures) and the straight edge facing down. I have always seen this the other way around ie chamfer facing down, but there are always exceptions to every rule, so is this one of them? I am wondering if I should reinstall it as I found it, or place it with the chanfer down as I have seen in most other watches where there is a chamfer present on the wheel... any advice from the forum?

I'm not sure if I am the first in the watch as the screw heads looked pristine, but a few were loose, and there were no markings on the back of the case (see pictures below) however, it would be quite difficult to do it on this kind of pressed case back, but there were a lot of strange scratchings on the back of the dial (see pictures), so just wondering if this is how some other watch maker marked their work for this kind of case back?? If I am the first in the watch then the intermediate wheel was installed chamfer up in the factory, so I should reinstall it this way, if I am not the first in there, then maybe the person before me installed it incorrectly? My fear is that if I try it the wrong way I start chipping off teeth from the sliding pinion!

What would you advise?

Watch:

signal-2023-07-26-205141_002.thumb.jpeg.cc963560fd95460a7764d54450ba68c4.jpeg

Inside showing movement information:

signal-2023-07-26-205141_003.thumb.jpeg.eaab641637c6e68a59526898512956fb.jpeg

Case back (outside) showing more movement information:

signal-2023-07-26-205141_004.thumb.jpeg.dde661bac143bbee8f9e0f4d134a7e60.jpeg

The intermediate wheel as I found it showing the chamfer facing up:

signal-2023-07-26-205141_005.thumb.jpeg.eabb9f5072ac9877f7f264a194a26b47.jpeg

Clean case back (no markings)

signal-2023-07-26-211137_002.thumb.jpeg.03ba7a7b16e9e7a39ece79a11ce87a1e.jpeg

Back of dial scratchings #1:

signal-2023-07-26-210748_003.thumb.jpeg.1ff3b03898ac33a4f0e210bfcd6bce1e.jpeg

Back of dial scratchings #2:

signal-2023-07-26-210748_002.thumb.jpeg.6fe7d281ab33966eba9f395f68d4acdd.jpeg

signal-2023-07-26-205141_004.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would guess you are not the first one to work on this watch and going by the markings on the dial back its been worked on a few times but maybe by the same person as its not usual to mark the back of the dial.

Is there any documentation for this watch showing which way the wheel should go, If not I would probably go with fitting it bevel down, like all the others you have worked on.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Waggy said:

I just stripped an Enicar AR 160 ready to clean and put back together, when taking it apart I noticed that the intermediate wheel was installed with the chamfer facing up (see pictures) and the straight edge facing down. I have always seen this the other way around ie chamfer facing down, but there are always exceptions to every rule, so is this one of them? I am wondering if I should reinstall it as I found it, or place it with the chanfer down as I have seen in most other watches where there is a chamfer present on the wheel... any advice from the forum?

I'm not sure if I am the first in the watch as the screw heads looked pristine, but a few were loose, and there were no markings on the back of the case (see pictures below) however, it would be quite difficult to do it on this kind of pressed case back, but there were a lot of strange scratchings on the back of the dial (see pictures), so just wondering if this is how some other watch maker marked their work for this kind of case back?? If I am the first in the watch then the intermediate wheel was installed chamfer up in the factory, so I should reinstall it this way, if I am not the first in there, then maybe the person before me installed it incorrectly? My fear is that if I try it the wrong way I start chipping off teeth from the sliding pinion!

What would you advise?

Watch:

signal-2023-07-26-205141_002.thumb.jpeg.cc963560fd95460a7764d54450ba68c4.jpeg

Inside showing movement information:

signal-2023-07-26-205141_003.thumb.jpeg.eaab641637c6e68a59526898512956fb.jpeg

Case back (outside) showing more movement information:

signal-2023-07-26-205141_004.thumb.jpeg.dde661bac143bbee8f9e0f4d134a7e60.jpeg

The intermediate wheel as I found it showing the chamfer facing up:

signal-2023-07-26-205141_005.thumb.jpeg.eabb9f5072ac9877f7f264a194a26b47.jpeg

Clean case back (no markings)

signal-2023-07-26-211137_002.thumb.jpeg.03ba7a7b16e9e7a39ece79a11ce87a1e.jpeg

Back of dial scratchings #1:

signal-2023-07-26-210748_003.thumb.jpeg.1ff3b03898ac33a4f0e210bfcd6bce1e.jpeg

Back of dial scratchings #2:

signal-2023-07-26-210748_002.thumb.jpeg.6fe7d281ab33966eba9f395f68d4acdd.jpeg

signal-2023-07-26-205141_004.jpeg

I had the same dilemma with an Oris, one of the first watches i worked on, i made the rookie mistake of not making a mental note of which way up i removed it. I was convinced it would be bevel up that just looked right. I stopped, took a moment to rethink, tried both ways to see how best it interacted. I decided on bevel down and its been fine. I suggest seeing how it meshes with the minute wheel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did email the owner of Horology Biology YouTube channel, as he works on many Enicars and he got back to me in less than 5 mins confirming my suspicion that the previous watch tinkerer had probably installed it upside down. 

There were some other hidden problems too, like mismatched screws and for some reason the plastic crystal was glued in place, so I'm very pleased that I was able to bring it back to its former glory... Or at least my version of it.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Waggy said:

I did email the owner of Horology Biology YouTube channel, as he works on many Enicars and he got back to me in less than 5 mins confirming my suspicion that the previous watch tinkerer had probably installed it upside down. 

There were some other hidden problems too, like mismatched screws and for some reason the plastic crystal was glued in place, so I'm very pleased that I was able to bring it back to its former glory... Or at least my version of it.

Nice, I've been after one for a while. It does look like its been overpolished though, the clean lines have gone. Still nice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be very honest, there is very little difference in chamfer down or up in my opinion. Some movements will have the chamfer up and some down. I've tried both ways and there is no difference in setting the hands, which is the most important factor in this. Some intermediate wheels don't have a chamfer on any side, so it isn't really that important. I think some can get too hung up on the stuff that really makes no difference to the running and working of the movement

 

Edited by Jon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

It does look like its been overpolished

I noticed this also, but then I realised that the case is not ss, only the case back. The case body is plated brass, so if it was over polished it would have exposed the brass under the plating... Unless it was replated, but seeing as there were so many mistakes on the previous rebuild, I don't think it was in the skill set of the previous repairer to plate the watch this well. 

Strange??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Waggy said:

I noticed this also, but then I realised that the case is not ss, only the case back. The case body is plated brass, so if it was over polished it would have exposed the brass under the plating... Unless it was replated, but seeing as there were so many mistakes on the previous rebuild, I don't think it was in the skill set of the previous repairer to plate the watch this well. 

Strange??

Ah ok maybe it was just designed that way, i didnt notice that on others. The photo also makes the finish look patchy top right and i thought i saw a few dings polished out in that area. Just how it looks. Lovely looking watch and on my list when something  crops up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Waggy said:

Ha ha, no I think these are just dirty fingerprints that I didn't clean off properly. 🤣

Ah yes the old finger grease it plays havoc with the shine. You're slipping mate 😉

31 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

I have know repairs to do this if the teeth are worn on the clutch wheel, some call it the castle wheel. 

I've also noticed that the bevel side starts to lose its mesh quicker there than at the minute wheel interaction, spinning it over sometimes recovers that and hopefully still enables time adjustment.  Funny how some parts are named appropriate to their function and action sometimes because of its location and again another alternative name for what it resembles. I suppose all helpful in a way as you know what it looks like and also what it does.  Bit confusing I've also seen a transmission wheel labeled a crown wheel, when a crown wheel takes the action of winding from the crown ( i guess also could be called a button wheel ) and the transmission wheel transfers winding action from the clutch to energise the mainspring.  No wonder beginners stuggle with terminology and part identity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/26/2023 at 10:42 AM, Waggy said:

I just stripped an Enicar AR 160 ready to clean and put back together, when taking it apart I noticed that the intermediate wheel was installed with the chamfer facing up (see pictures) and the straight edge facing down. I have always seen this the other way around ie chamfer facing down, but there are always exceptions to every rule, so is this one of them? I am wondering if I should reinstall it as I found it, or place it with the chanfer down as I have seen in most other watches where there is a chamfer present on the wheel... any advice from the forum?

I'm not sure if I am the first in the watch as the screw heads looked pristine, but a few were loose, and there were no markings on the back of the case (see pictures below) however, it would be quite difficult to do it on this kind of pressed case back, but there were a lot of strange scratchings on the back of the dial (see pictures), so just wondering if this is how some other watch maker marked their work for this kind of case back?? If I am the first in the watch then the intermediate wheel was installed chamfer up in the factory, so I should reinstall it this way, if I am not the first in there, then maybe the person before me installed it incorrectly? My fear is that if I try it the wrong way I start chipping off teeth from the sliding pinion!

What would you advise?

Watch:

signal-2023-07-26-205141_002.thumb.jpeg.cc963560fd95460a7764d54450ba68c4.jpeg

Inside showing movement information:

signal-2023-07-26-205141_003.thumb.jpeg.eaab641637c6e68a59526898512956fb.jpeg

Case back (outside) showing more movement information:

signal-2023-07-26-205141_004.thumb.jpeg.dde661bac143bbee8f9e0f4d134a7e60.jpeg

The intermediate wheel as I found it showing the chamfer facing up:

signal-2023-07-26-205141_005.thumb.jpeg.eabb9f5072ac9877f7f264a194a26b47.jpeg

Clean case back (no markings)

signal-2023-07-26-211137_002.thumb.jpeg.03ba7a7b16e9e7a39ece79a11ce87a1e.jpeg

Back of dial scratchings #1:

signal-2023-07-26-210748_003.thumb.jpeg.1ff3b03898ac33a4f0e210bfcd6bce1e.jpeg

Back of dial scratchings #2:

signal-2023-07-26-210748_002.thumb.jpeg.6fe7d281ab33966eba9f395f68d4acdd.jpeg

signal-2023-07-26-205141_004.jpeg

About the dial-back scratchings: why do they do it that way? I've always wondered, since seems like a pencil and paper would be far easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Galilea said:

About the dial-back scratchings: why do they do it that way? I've always wondered, since seems like a pencil and paper would be far easier.

I guess so its information that cant be lost its always with the watch, also lets other repairers know when it was serviced. A log would be better though which can also contain any information regarding actual repairs and current overall condition. Maybe too much trouble to bother.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have attempted to decipher many such marks, on pocket watches in particular, and most seem meaningless to anyone other than the inscriber. The ones that seem useful to others include service date. Very rarely I have seen a short list of whatever was repaired, which would be of great relevance.

22 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I guess so its information that cant be lost its always with the watch, also lets other repairers know when it was serviced. A log would be better though which can also contain any information regarding actual repairs and current overall condition. Maybe too much trouble to bother.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Galilea said:

I have attempted to decipher many such marks, on pocket watches in particular, and most seem meaningless to anyone other than the inscriber. The ones that seem useful to others include service date. Very rarely I have seen a short list of whatever was repaired, which would be of great relevance.

 

 

17 minutes ago, Galilea said:

I have attempted to decipher many such marks, on pocket watches in particular, and most seem meaningless to anyone other than the inscriber. The ones that seem useful to others include service date. Very rarely I have seen a short list of whatever was repaired, which would be of great relevance.

 

Usually just a code or repairers Initials and a date. Maybe the code relates to a reference in a log book with more information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many of these code refer to ticket repair numbers. You will never fully understand them. I never made any I D marks, what I did was have a book with the persons name ticket number watch type and name on the dial and work carried out such as parts replaced.  

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

Many of these code refer to ticket repair numbers. You will never fully understand them. I never made any I D marks, what I did was have a book with the persons name ticket number watch type and name on the dial and work carried out such as parts replaced.  

I suppose they alone tended to service any particular watch, so that makes sense; if they knew they would see it again.

Also, isn't "old hippy" an oxymoron? Like "retired artist"? Namaste, England, it's curtains on my day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/27/2023 at 2:11 PM, Waggy said:

All done, the wheel was in upside down... All good now.

Upside down or 'backwards'? Perhaps the horologist thought he was working on a Racine?

(...that was funnier in my head...) Nice looking vintage you have running well anyways. That particular case back troubles me a bit- I think it's supposed to be a smiling dolphin but there's a toothless shark vibe to him...

Edited by rehajm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That will mean dismantling the gear train, which with 5 pivots to align was a pain. Probably going to have to though. I'm convinced it's something to do with the great wheel. 
    • As far as I know, the only time an epilame treatment has potential drawbacks is when something is rubbing on the treated part w/o lubrication in between creating abrasive dust. That is, I don't believe in the method of "running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed". So, I think the rule would be; do not epilame treat parts where rubbing is going on without lubrication. Other than that I don't think we have anything to worry about. That said, I'm not an expert, and I'm always happy to learn more. Has any other repairer than Alex suggested or explained the "making-a-groove" method? My impression is that it's just something he constructed in his mind. I have not perceived it as a generally practiced method. Again, I could be wrong!
    • Post some pictures , some good close ones of the parts you've described. 
    • Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. If its a potential problem for amateurs to use then i would prefer not to take the risk .
    • Following on from my question about identifying screws in the AS2063 movement that basically fell out of the case in bits, I’m pleased to report that I’ve got it all back together, and the movement is running pretty well.    But… There’s something wrong with the keyless works and hand setting. It’s fine in winding and quickset date position - these work - but in hand setting position winding the crown turns the whole gear train.  I don’t really understand how it’s meant to work. It doesn’t have a traditional friction fit cannon pinion.  The second wheel is unusual with a pair of smaller pinions on it, which seem to interact with the barrel and the motion works.    Could this be the problem? I must admit I just cleaned it and popped it in place when reassembling the gear train. I’ve lubricated the pivots but didn’t do anything to the extra bits on the second wheel.    Does this make sense and is anyone able to figure out what I’m doing wrong? Thanks in advance, as always.    ETA - the parts list calls it the Great Wheel, not second wheel. 
×
×
  • Create New...