Jump to content

Unusual radio-controlled wristwatch and why are there so few digital ones?


Recommended Posts

It has a very light plastic case with mineral glass, the engine room is almost empty, and the model is also non-existent. Unfortunately, I can't find the instructions anymore, not even the model itself. Brand: Majestic made in Germany. I completely disassembled the part, I don't remember why, but now I put a battery in and I'm trying to adjust it. First you have to push in the crown, then the watch runs quickly, to 12 digits and waits until it receives the signal and adjusts itself. Hour is set with the crown pulled, the hour hand always jumps one hour further, mechanically! (It wasn't right at first, then I compensated for the wrong values and then it worked, later it also worked with setting it to 12.) Can someone tell me more about the watch and the technology? The battery cover grips the crown with one arm and serves as a contact switch. Actually, it's all very spartan and technically impressively simple, I wonder which crazy engineer designed it all to let this model appear on the market for a short time.

---------------------------------

Then it occurs to me that there are only a few digital radio-controlled clocks, most of them have hands. So I wonder why that is.

--------------------------------

And the market is flooded with cheap jewelless watches, most with some standard movement. The question is how long do watches without jewels or with a jewel on this spindle with the magnet, the jewel sits where the flywheel/magnet sits.

2023-07-17-112036.jpg

2023-07-17-111939.jpg

Edited by Fischgott
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't tell you much about the movement, but my best friend works at NIST where the signal it uses to set itself comes from. He just designed/made/installed a new FPGA based server for that signal, and will be moving all the servers to his equipment in the near future. If you have something that uses the atomic clock signal, it goes through his equipment.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice detail, thank you, but this is not the source of my signal, mine is dcf 🙂 because my watch residents in Germany. See the locations worldwide: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_clock My watches get the signal in around 5 Minutes, i guess the dcf signal is sent every 5 or 10 Minutes or so.

And i discovered that casio has also G-Shock radio watches, and some unknown vendors have digital radio watches too, but i think they are all together overlooked somehow in my opinion. Casios watches can even process the signal from different stations worldwide. You dont have to adjust your watch every now and then, and the summer and winter time is also set for you by the signal.

Found this link: https://www.hkw-elektronik.de/produkte/empfangstechnik-am/pc-funkuhren/ very interesting. Looked up the letters on the pcb. Dont remember the internals exactly but this could be it: https://www.hkw-elektronik.de/produkte/empfangstechnik-am/funkuhr-und-steuermodule/ And the hours are set through metal disks and springs and a very unique lever.

Edited by Fischgott
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the problems with the all the clocks and/or watches that receive digital time signals is the problem of getting a nice clean reception.  Then the next amusements for me is what do they do if they don't get a nice clean signal?

5 hours ago, Fischgott said:

My watches get the signal in around 5 Minutes, i guess the dcf signal is sent every 5 or 10 Minutes or so.

What you typically find with these items is they do not try to receive continuously. Running the receiver continuously consumes a lot of power and watches typically don't have a lot of power. So usually what they do is they will attempt to synchronize from time to time like every 24 hours typically sometime after midnight when there's less interference. Even initially when you're setting the time on them or their trying to set the time they might ask you just give up for a while and then try later if they can't get a signal which means of course that your watch isn't on time.

Here's a link to the US transmitter.

https://www.nist.gov/pml/time-and-frequency-division/time-distribution/radio-station-wwvb

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read up that within 2 minutes the watch should get the signal, i talk about a watch without time waiting for signal. Very interesting video: Amplify signal by hanging the watch over a metal tube: 

 

The perfect atomic wristwatch would be the F91W without any buttons. Always 24h mode, time in second, day of the week, day plus month, no other function. Thats it. There are only very big atomic digital watches out there, but very small atomic analoge watches. I cant get why. Also i prefer flexible stretch wristbands.

I also cant get why a watch has to be big, because its ugly, it gets in the way, its unkomfortabel, it clings everywhere. And then the "luxury" watches, watches for thousands of dollars with obsolete technology from before 100 years with a brandname. Is it because ones ego thinks: whooo im special

I also dont like the fitness features, its a waste of time, unless you are a maniac who destroys his body professionally.

Also the signal should be used as an emergency alert, so everybody gets awake in the night in case of a disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'll have a look for it, but don't hold your breathe. Failing that I'll make another video when another bezel needs to be removed.
    • The UK lots can be a 404 hit or miss, 6 - 10 watches can come in anywhere from 20 - 50 quid. I once had a 404 division of 8 watches for a fraction over 30 quid, one of them was a Smiths Astral model National 17 an absolute certainty for winner contender. The crystal was scrached up to the point of being very difficult to see the brand, something triggered a gut feeling in me and it paid off.
    • I just picked up this Mondaine quartz watch on tradera.com for £11. It's a non-runner so I will replace the Ronda movement (£10.95 at Cousins), polish the case, replace the case-back gasket, and replace the mineral crystal. Now, the problem is finding a suitable crystal. The original crystal is slightly domed (2.4mm thick dome), measures 36.4mm in diameter, and is 1.3mm thick at the edge. The closest I can get on CousinsUK is 36.5mm in diameter, 3.1mm thick dome, and 1.5mm thick at the edge. I think the replacement crystal would look OK, but the problem is finding a suitable glass gasket. The case diameter for the glass gasket is 36.9mm and the closest glass gasket I can find on CousinsUK is either 36.8x36.0mm or 37.0x36.2mm. I guess one of those glass gaskets could work but as you can see there's no way the 36.5mm domed crystal would fit the inner diameters of those glass gaskets. I guess I will have to give up on a domed crystal, no? So, the backup plan is to use a (1.5mm) thick flat mineral crystal as the diameters come in increments of 0.1mm. But, what glass gasket would be the better option? The one with an outer diameter of 36.8 (0.1mm too small) or the one with an outer diameter of 37.0mm (0.1mm too large). Again the case diameter for the glass gasket is 36.9mm. I believe I read or heard that the crystal diameter should be 0.1mm wider than the inner diameter of the glass gasket. Is that correct? I'm sorry for all the numbers. I've tried to make it as clear as I could. So, I'd appreciate your thoughts on this. BTW, measuring and sourcing crystals and gaskets is extremely time-consuming! 😓
    • Lots to choose from... Just sayin'.
    • Thank you for your introduction and welcome to this friendly forum. We all look forward to your contributions and continued involvement. 
×
×
  • Create New...