Jump to content

Unusual radio-controlled wristwatch and why are there so few digital ones?


Recommended Posts

It has a very light plastic case with mineral glass, the engine room is almost empty, and the model is also non-existent. Unfortunately, I can't find the instructions anymore, not even the model itself. Brand: Majestic made in Germany. I completely disassembled the part, I don't remember why, but now I put a battery in and I'm trying to adjust it. First you have to push in the crown, then the watch runs quickly, to 12 digits and waits until it receives the signal and adjusts itself. Hour is set with the crown pulled, the hour hand always jumps one hour further, mechanically! (It wasn't right at first, then I compensated for the wrong values and then it worked, later it also worked with setting it to 12.) Can someone tell me more about the watch and the technology? The battery cover grips the crown with one arm and serves as a contact switch. Actually, it's all very spartan and technically impressively simple, I wonder which crazy engineer designed it all to let this model appear on the market for a short time.

---------------------------------

Then it occurs to me that there are only a few digital radio-controlled clocks, most of them have hands. So I wonder why that is.

--------------------------------

And the market is flooded with cheap jewelless watches, most with some standard movement. The question is how long do watches without jewels or with a jewel on this spindle with the magnet, the jewel sits where the flywheel/magnet sits.

2023-07-17-112036.jpg

2023-07-17-111939.jpg

Edited by Fischgott
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't tell you much about the movement, but my best friend works at NIST where the signal it uses to set itself comes from. He just designed/made/installed a new FPGA based server for that signal, and will be moving all the servers to his equipment in the near future. If you have something that uses the atomic clock signal, it goes through his equipment.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice detail, thank you, but this is not the source of my signal, mine is dcf 🙂 because my watch residents in Germany. See the locations worldwide: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_clock My watches get the signal in around 5 Minutes, i guess the dcf signal is sent every 5 or 10 Minutes or so.

And i discovered that casio has also G-Shock radio watches, and some unknown vendors have digital radio watches too, but i think they are all together overlooked somehow in my opinion. Casios watches can even process the signal from different stations worldwide. You dont have to adjust your watch every now and then, and the summer and winter time is also set for you by the signal.

Found this link: https://www.hkw-elektronik.de/produkte/empfangstechnik-am/pc-funkuhren/ very interesting. Looked up the letters on the pcb. Dont remember the internals exactly but this could be it: https://www.hkw-elektronik.de/produkte/empfangstechnik-am/funkuhr-und-steuermodule/ And the hours are set through metal disks and springs and a very unique lever.

Edited by Fischgott
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the problems with the all the clocks and/or watches that receive digital time signals is the problem of getting a nice clean reception.  Then the next amusements for me is what do they do if they don't get a nice clean signal?

5 hours ago, Fischgott said:

My watches get the signal in around 5 Minutes, i guess the dcf signal is sent every 5 or 10 Minutes or so.

What you typically find with these items is they do not try to receive continuously. Running the receiver continuously consumes a lot of power and watches typically don't have a lot of power. So usually what they do is they will attempt to synchronize from time to time like every 24 hours typically sometime after midnight when there's less interference. Even initially when you're setting the time on them or their trying to set the time they might ask you just give up for a while and then try later if they can't get a signal which means of course that your watch isn't on time.

Here's a link to the US transmitter.

https://www.nist.gov/pml/time-and-frequency-division/time-distribution/radio-station-wwvb

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read up that within 2 minutes the watch should get the signal, i talk about a watch without time waiting for signal. Very interesting video: Amplify signal by hanging the watch over a metal tube: 

 

The perfect atomic wristwatch would be the F91W without any buttons. Always 24h mode, time in second, day of the week, day plus month, no other function. Thats it. There are only very big atomic digital watches out there, but very small atomic analoge watches. I cant get why. Also i prefer flexible stretch wristbands.

I also cant get why a watch has to be big, because its ugly, it gets in the way, its unkomfortabel, it clings everywhere. And then the "luxury" watches, watches for thousands of dollars with obsolete technology from before 100 years with a brandname. Is it because ones ego thinks: whooo im special

I also dont like the fitness features, its a waste of time, unless you are a maniac who destroys his body professionally.

Also the signal should be used as an emergency alert, so everybody gets awake in the night in case of a disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
    • Maybe I'm over simplifying this and I'm a little late to the discussion, but just by my looking at oil when I use it on a treated cap jewel  the oil stays in one nice bubble, but when I don't it spreads out to the edges of the jewel. I'm not sure (but could well be wrong) but the analogy of a waxed car and rain is accurate in this case, the wax is very hydrophobic and repels the water, however, the process epilame works by is a different physical process based upon cohesion/adhesion (oleophilic) not repulsion (oleophobic)  at least as far as I have read/observed. If one were to use a oleophobic substance equivalent to wax (hydrophobic) then one would need to create a donut shape to fence in the oil, however if one used such a strategy with a epilame which is oleophilic then the oil would sit on the ring of the donut and not in the 'donut hole', exactly where you don't want it. Even if the oil is smeared then the oleophilic epilame should pull it back to the center (see diagram below). Reference For interest the chemical in epilame is 2-(PERFLUOROHEXYL) ETHYL METHACRYLATE, CAS NO: 2144-53-8
×
×
  • Create New...