Jump to content

Preservation of wood?


Recommended Posts

Whatever you do, don't use Lemon Pledge. That contains some synthetic stuff that gives the wood a "moldy" appearance after a year when it dries up. And the only way to get rid of the moldy look is to apply another coat of Pledge. It's horrible.

Personally, I use Howard's Feed n Wax now after learning it the hard way.

https://www.howardproducts.com/product/feed-n-wax-wood-polish-and-conditioner/

But I'm curious as to what professional clockmakers use. Renaissance Wax? $$$

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't use linseed oil. It's a drying oil, and would essentially be like adding to the finish. Pure beeswax is a pretty hard solid, and won't apply very easily, or look good when it does. Furniture wax is a pretty wide range of things.

The origin of the Lemon Pledge option is likely lemon oil. Not for every finish (unknown what the clock has on it to begin with), but it's what we (luthiers) use on fretboards (bare wood). Some people use it on bodies and everything else as well, but I've never been one of those people. It stays oily, and unless the finish is open pored, it might not do much more than be a dust magnet.

You could MAKE a furniture wax of beeswax mixed with a non-drying oil (olive oil for instance). I forget the ratio you need for it to be easily applied though... You can shave a block of beeswax into a mason jar. Note the weight (make it a round number for simplicity) and add... 15% by weight of olive oil. Microwave it, and stir. Let it cool. If it's soft enough to wipe on, go nuts. Otherwise, add a little more oil, and repeat until it wipes on easily. There are commercial options, but you never know what you're getting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a cabinetmaker, I have made a couple of long cases to house recovered movements and my recommendation is ,as above, to use a beeswax polish.

We have a saying on polishing wood with beeswax: once a day for a week, once a week for a month, once a month for a year. This is how very old tables and furniture have built up beautiful deep finishes over the years.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Make sure the clock is away from central heating you don't want it near gas or electric radiators because they will not only dry out the wood but dry the oil from the movement. Never use that so called muck they call polish in an aerosol. A good clear beeswax is best, apply with a clean cloth and rub off with a clean cloth. Do this about every 6 weeks. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, you are correct. Beeswax is hard, like a bar of soap. But wood finishing beeswax is dissolved in a solvent like orange oil, mineral oil, etc. The solvent will evaporate and leave a thin film behind. Some elbow grease will work it into the wood and give a nice lustre.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Rancid" is when the hydrocarbon chains break, and the resulting free fatty acids bind with oxygen to form aromatic compounds that smell bad and are able to accumulate in sufficient concentration that you can smell them. Beyond that, Oils is oils (this excludes any mineral derived oils, different thing entirely). Hydrocarbon chains of varying lengths with varying degrees of saturation. Olive oil is 18 carbon bonds, and is partially saturated. Linseed oil is 16, pretty thoroughly unsaturated, and the free fatty acids like to form polymers when oxydized. Chemistry mumbo jumbo aside, there's nothing special about olive oil that makes it for cooking or vice versa. Olive oil is medium length, relatively saturated, and non-drying. It was traditionally used in all sorts of things that wanted oil that didn't dry, such as leather treatment, wood finishing, etc. I use it routinely for French polishing for example, as well as maintaining my vegetable tanned leather. I have also used it to cut beeswax for wood/leather treatment in the same manner. It's a good, readily available, middle of the road oil without any major drawbacks.

Waxes are like oils, but even longer, and fully saturated carbon chains.

Martyd's recipe is another good one. The carnuba wax is fairly modern, but turpentine evaporates more quickly and would have been common prior to the rise of "better living through chemistry" in the latter half of the 20th century. You could do turpentine and beeswax as a finish to split the chronological difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Welcome! To which part of India will my greetings go? Frank
    • I agree with @Waggy, no need to adjust. That looks very good to me. The factory specs for 7S26 are something like -35 to +45s/day, but they are usually better. The amplitude is good. When wearing, the most important positions are dial up, crown down and crown left. You need to regulate so that these positions average out to about zero. Crown down is showing +14, so you may have to set dial up to slightly minus s/day. The absolute values of +/-s/day don't really matter, as long as they aren't too far out. The only way to get good accuracy is to wear it for a couple of days, recording the errors, and gradually tweaking.
    • @Jon The link is no longer working and I wanted to see that demonstration again. Is there any chance you can make it available again? I'd appreciate it!
    • Or, if you have a staking set or jewelling too, just use one of the stumps. You can choose a fine tip to fit inside a jewel if necessary.
    • Good morning,   To be honest, I'm not sure I trust my own logic anymore 😅. But here's a picture of my own (failed!) attempt to install a new rotor axle. I punched way to hard and even split the metal of the rotor. My thinking was that, in my case, the axle sits "deeper" in the rotor and hence the rotor would be closer to the movement plates. Vice versa, I was thinking that a very light punch could cause the rotor to sit rather high. But not sure that makes sense because in both cases, the flat part of the axle and the rotor align equally.     Sorry, but is he saying that the outside of the caseback has been polished to such an extent that the inside of the caseback has deformed/sunk??? That sounds crazy to me because those casebacks are thick! Can you see any signs of that on the inside of the caseback? Have you tried screwing in the caseback a litte bit more or less so that the supposedly "sunk" part of the caseback would move from 9 o'clock to e.g. 6/7 or 11/12 o'clock?  If the caseback is truly deformed, maybe it could be punched/pressed back into shape (e.g. with glass/caseback closing press).      I agree with your choice. But yea, Rolex makes it VERY hard for independent watchmakers to do a perfect job because we can't get (original) parts easily.      Your pictures aren't too bad. But still impossible to see if the rotor isn't perfectly flat. You'd have to look at it with your loupe, from the side (like the pictures), and turn the rotor to see if the gaps (with the automatic bridge plates) increase/decrease.     Finally... how is the up/down play of the rotor? To test, take a toothpick/pegwood and press on the small triangular side of the rotor next to the axle (NOT the big side where the weight is. But the opposite side.). Does that lift up the weight-side of the rotor? There can be some play, but it should really be minimal. If there's too much play, a new spring clip is the first thing to do. After that, one could play around with the jewels. This is too much:
×
×
  • Create New...