Jump to content

DIY "Seitz" jeweled pivot gauge .......


Recommended Posts

In order to start learning my Jacot tool and select the right size bed, I wished for a Seitz jeweled pivot gauge.

Sadly, the prices asked for these gauges are astronomical. Currently on eBay from €350 and way upwards to over €500 !!

Wild West prices 😵

 

1382314981_Seitzguage.thumb.jpg.270974da03160ea5f532559fe600e36a.jpg

 

In my Seitz jewel-box I had a "complete" range of jewels 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18 & 19 in the OD size of 110 and 20,22,24,26,28, 30 & 32 in the OD size of 120.

Marked 27x spots (1x1cm distance) on 10cmx10cm, 1mm thick copper-sheet and drilled them out with a 1mm drill.

IMG_2806.thumb.jpeg.fc287f22dca47541efc89d2f9d82a301.jpeg

The holes for the jewel sizes 8-19 were reamed to 109 and the other holes reamed to 119.

IMG_2807.thumb.jpeg.eed023a96fa9535a17c88bfe276c82f1.jpeg

Cut the "to be jewel-gauge" at the size of 10x4cm, polished it and inserted the jewels;

IMG_2810.thumb.jpeg.3715173619f494e72710b37b9f50c769.jpeg

Left the holes open for the "missing" jewels; 21, 23, 25, 27, 29 & 31 and there are two more slots empty for 33 & 34;

IMG_2809.thumb.jpeg.c7656b1e80ccc5655c0d17ac4e2609a0.jpeg

Whether I'll ever need these bigger sizes? They weren't in the Seitz jewel-box, perhaps for a reason? If I ever stumble over these sizes, I can insert them, the holes are already there. Those "missing" bigger sizes are also easy & safely to measure with a micrometer or gauge-caliper.

For now, I have a jeweled pivot-gauge with a full range from 8/100 to 20/100 and from 22/100 to 32/100 in steps of 2/100, I think enough for making a start on my Jacot-tool 🙂

Next, to finish this project off, is to find some small metal-stamps to number the jewel sizes.......

 

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 11
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Endeavor said:

Left the holes open for the "missing" jewels; 21, 23, 25, 27, 29 & 31 and there are two more slots empty for 33 & 34;

If somebody, here in the EU, can help me on the missing sizes, preferably 120 in diameter, but slightly bigger are also no problem, I would be very interested.

Just in an envelop and I can pay with PayPal friends. Please PM me if you can help me out 😉

 

Edited by Endeavor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, praezis said:

However the gauge jewels have smaller hole tolerance than the public available ones, afaik.

It seems that you can't win 😬

The jewels I installed in my gauge are from a Seitz jewel-box. So, you are saying that the jewels installed in the official Seitz Jewel gauge do have smaller tolerances? If so, any idea by how much?

The whole, initial idea, was to have a gauge to safely determine a pivot size in order to select the correct bed of a Jacot tool runner.

Of course, my gauge has (hopefully) also to be able, in case of a broken jewel replacement, to select the correct jewel hole-size for a given pivot  .......... yes/no?

 

Edited by Endeavor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

If you go in to production

Will notify you if I do 😉

Finally found a set of number stamps. Initially I couldn't find any on the German eBay until I typed the magic word "Schlagzahlensatz" in 🙂

3mm is hopefully a nice size ....

 

 

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, praezis said:

However the gauge jewels have smaller hole tolerance than the public available ones, afaik.

I'm also curious. What exactly does that mean? If a hole is specified to be 0.18 mm, whether on the Seitz jewel gauge or in the Seitz jewel box, its diameter is 0.18 mm, no (give or take a few microns which shouldn't have any significance, I guess )? 🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my old Seitz catalog it says the jewels are accurate to 1/4 of 100th of a mm, or 0.0025. Not sure if that's +- or total; I recall seeing the same claim on one of the jewel assortments but not sure? I definitely have jewels in my stock (from other makers) with in-between sizes, like 0.095mm. I use the Seitz pivot straightener as a gage, and it's in 0.0025mm steps, so I would imagine those jewels are indeed held to a tighter tolerance. I think it's pretty standard practice to hold the jewel hole size to within 0.0025mm, it was 20 years ago but I visited the Robellaz jewel factory in Ste-Croix and remember being shocked how precise the jewels were- and also had a new respect for them!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/1/2023 at 6:49 PM, Endeavor said:

In order to start learning my Jacot tool and select the right size bed, I wished for a Seitz jeweled pivot gauge.

Sadly, the prices asked for these gauges are astronomical. Currently on eBay from €350 and way upwards to over €500 !!

Wild West prices 😵

 

1382314981_Seitzguage.thumb.jpg.270974da03160ea5f532559fe600e36a.jpg

 

In my Seitz jewel-box I had a "complete" range of jewels 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18 & 19 in the OD size of 110 and 20,22,24,26,28, 30 & 32 in the OD size of 120.

Marked 27x spots (1x1cm distance) on 10cmx10cm, 1mm thick copper-sheet and drilled them out with a 1mm drill.

IMG_2806.thumb.jpeg.fc287f22dca47541efc89d2f9d82a301.jpeg

The holes for the jewel sizes 8-19 were reamed to 109 and the other holes reamed to 119.

IMG_2807.thumb.jpeg.eed023a96fa9535a17c88bfe276c82f1.jpeg

Cut the "to be jewel-gauge" at the size of 10x4cm, polished it and inserted the jewels;

IMG_2810.thumb.jpeg.3715173619f494e72710b37b9f50c769.jpeg

Left the holes open for the "missing" jewels; 21, 23, 25, 27, 29 & 31 and there are two more slots empty for 33 & 34;

IMG_2809.thumb.jpeg.c7656b1e80ccc5655c0d17ac4e2609a0.jpeg

Whether I'll ever need these bigger sizes? They weren't in the Seitz jewel-box, perhaps for a reason? If I ever stumble over these sizes, I can insert them, the holes are already there. Those "missing" bigger sizes are also easy & safely to measure with a micrometer or gauge-caliper.

For now, I have a jeweled pivot-gauge with a full range from 8/100 to 20/100 and from 22/100 to 32/100 in steps of 2/100, I think enough for making a start on my Jacot-tool 🙂

Next, to finish this project off, is to find some small metal-stamps to number the jewel sizes.......

 

Nice work endeavour, you have some good jewelling skills there 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

In my old Seitz catalog it says the jewels are accurate to 1/4 of 100th of a mm, or 0.0025. Not sure if that's +- or total

Exactly what I found and wondered about in my Seitz booklets. 

There is much bla-bla about high quality and accuracy, but they avoid hard facts. Do they mean tolerance of +-0.0025mm? Would be funny, as their 0.0025 mm stepped gauges claim the same accuracy in the catalog 😀.

Only the preface in the 1944 book claims +-0.00012mm for the gauges. Some pages later, gauges, „accurate to 1/4 of 100th of a mm“.

Jewels: I can offer 23/140 and 25/140

Frank

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To conclude this thread, here the end result.

Not as neat & slick as I had in mind and not as neat & slick as the "real-$$$-deal", but it will work. Two more jewels to be added (23 & 25), which are on their way, kindly donated by our valued WTR member @praezis

It's fun and educative making this usable tool. I hadn't done jeweling before and this has given me quite some practice. I also learned more about the Seitz jeweling tool and the reamers (https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/26672-hole-shape-when-using-a-seitz-jewel-setting-tool-reamer/)

Sadly for the few, it won't be taken into production. Inspirational only 😉

Oh yes, I managed to screw up the stamping of the numbers, but which other number better to pick than number "13" ? 🤣

IMG_0803.thumb.jpeg.81b7065a6cdabe53b3bb01978bf231cc.jpeg

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Endeavor said:

To conclude this thread, here the end result.

Not as neat & slick as I had in mind and not as neat & slick as the "real-$$$-deal", but it will work. Two more jewels to be added (23 & 25), which are on their way, kindly donated by our valued WTR member @praezis

It's fun and educative making this usable tool. I hadn't done jeweling before and this has given me quite some practice. I also learned more about the Seitz jeweling tool and the reamers (https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/26672-hole-shape-when-using-a-seitz-jewel-setting-tool-reamer/)

Sadly for the few, it won't be taken into production. Inspirational only 😉

Oh yes, I managed to screw up the stamping of the numbers, but which other number better to pick than number "13" ? 🤣

IMG_0803.thumb.jpeg.81b7065a6cdabe53b3bb01978bf231cc.jpeg

Not sure whether to like or laugh.  Hehe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Endeavor said:

To conclude this thread, here the end result.

Not as neat & slick as I had in mind and not as neat & slick as the "real-$$$-deal", but it will work. Two more jewels to be added (23 & 25), which are on their way, kindly donated by our valued WTR member @praezis

It's fun and educative making this usable tool. I hadn't done jeweling before and this has given me quite some practice. I also learned more about the Seitz jeweling tool and the reamers (https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/26672-hole-shape-when-using-a-seitz-jewel-setting-tool-reamer/)

Sadly for the few, it won't be taken into production. Inspirational only 😉

Oh yes, I managed to screw up the stamping of the numbers, but which other number better to pick than number "13" ? 🤣

IMG_0803.thumb.jpeg.81b7065a6cdabe53b3bb01978bf231cc.jpeg

Haha on purpose or spooky ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/8/2023 at 6:26 AM, Endeavor said:

Oh yes, I managed to screw up the stamping of the numbers, but which other number better to pick than number "13" ? 🤣

…copied in quantity they could be plates for the buttons in very small elevators?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • The fact that the seconds runner starts running smoothly when you engage the chrono seconds makes me think the clutch is out of adjustment. That's a guess because I can't seem to find out too much about the chronograph module Breitling used on this model. On other Navitimers they used the Valjoux 7750 which had the running seconds on the left where the hand was mounted on an extended pivot on the fourth wheel. It looks to me that whatever pinion is driving that wheel is skipping teeth. Given that Breitling (et al) is not forthcoming with manuals or parts, I would send it back and ask for expedited service. They should be sufficiently embarrassed to do that for you at least.
    • Looks like someone forced in a screw that was bigger than the hole.  You would probably need to drill it out with a tungsten carbide rod sharpened at the tip to look like a spade drill. I'll see if I can find a video on how to make one. Start with a 0.5mm rod, then work your way up in 0.1mm increments until the walls of the hole weaken the screw enough to break it up.  This is a very time consuming, slow process. You'll need to centre the hole properly and not deviate. WD40 helps. The other option is to abandon the hole and use a dial dot. As much as I hate dial dots, this might be the safest option for a beginner.  Ok, found it.  
    • For those who are, curious I broke out the macro lens and took a few shots.  I'm attaching four of them: Image 1 is from the watchmaker's side and generally shows the problem area. Image 2 is a detail view of the offending dial foot hole (called out with the green circle), the tip of the offending screw (orange arrow) and the blue line indicates the approximate position of what's left of the head of the screw (determined by using an oiler as a feeler gauge to transfer that measurement to the visible portion of the plate.) Image 3 is looking down the screw hole you can see the head of the broken screw at the bottom. Image 4 is the same, but with less contrast to give a better appreciation of the condition of that end of the screw. I can almost convince myself that I can see the remains of the screw slot in the head, but I have to use alot of imagination in that exercise. Heard and understood.  There does appear to be a steel locating pin that can be seen in the lower, right center of Image 1 (right "above" the oval shaped slot that is to the left of where the pinion/clutch parts of the keyless works nestle into the plate.)  As I don't see a way to remove that I'd have to keep it out of the solution and have even contemplated dropping a little paraffin on it to give it a "rain coat" of sorts.  As I missed that before I did the closeup photos, I feel that I'm going to be looking at this plate in much greater detail to see if there anything else I might have missed. The screw assortments seem like a good acquisition.  The eBay seller who has the donor movements I was looking at never replied so I may just take a chance and get one of those as well a screw assortment.  They do seem like they'd be handy.  I have to confess that the idea of fabricating the needed screws appears to some deep part of my soul, I also have to confess that I do not yet have either the equipment, or the skill to use it.  Perhaps one day, but that day has not arrived (and I have alot of pricey bits and bobs that I will likely need to get along the way.) I thought about this, but the dial foot screw doesn't seem to be wide enough to get the thing out if I could advance it into the hole.  I suppose that I could try and take it out in pieces (advance it as far as it will go, get in there with some sort of saw, take a piece off, walk it forward again, take another piece, etc) but that seems like alot of risk to the main plate. I need to examine the other screw to ensure it doesn't have a shoulder or something that would prevent me from doing something like that.  However, all that said, I've been unable to get the thing to move at all. In general, this whole piece feels like someone had it before me, did a bad job of working on it and ultimately just bunged it all back together in a haphazard way and passed it on to be someone else's problem.
×
×
  • Create New...