Jump to content

ingenious? Make your own winder?


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Who else  noticed the four mangled springs in the corner of the room 😆. Tbf not a bad idea with a bit of tweeking. Not so sure about the barrel arbor in the pin vice though, under magnification thats going to show up some scuffing of a polished arbor shaft.

You could use a barrel arbor holder($$) or collet holding pinvise ($$ plus collets $$).

 

Though some cheap pinvises have fairly soft jaws, might not mess up the bearing surfaces.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

You could use a barrel arbor holder($$) or collet holding pinvise ($$ plus collets $$).

 

Though some cheap pinvises have fairly soft jaws, might not mess up the bearing surfaces.

Wow not cheap a full complement of all 8 sizes of Bergeon arbor holders runs to  £500 at best. I guess some luck and a good gauge of how much to tighten your pinvice helps. An unnoticed damaged arbor will surly chew up the barrel or lid's arbor bearing in time. 

39 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

You could use a barrel arbor holder($$) or collet holding pinvise ($$ plus collets $$).

 

Though some cheap pinvises have fairly soft jaws, might not mess up the bearing surfaces.

This might be a good alternative it was a tenner. The jaws are wide, thick and made of brass and when fastened down give good coverage of whatever they are gripping. The only issue is the size 1.8mm to 3mm so well out of the range of most arbors. Or this steel pin vice - square off the jaw tips and smooth broach out the jaws. I think that one was only about four quid.

16834831648498808611590155529953.jpg

16834831914718356690836124018642.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw the video on YouTube last week but I thought the acrylic sheet would get chewed up pretty quickly. Aluminium would probably be sturdier. 

I use a brass jawed pin vise from Cousins for inserting stubborn arbors. It holds the arbor very securely and so far has not scratched or damaged any arbors yet. 

Great idea. I've always wondered why nobody manufactures a winder like the types for clock mainsprings, which uses the original arbor and steel containment rings.

Can you imagine if clockmakers had to buy a different winder for every movement they worked on? ($$$$$$)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/8/2023 at 12:12 AM, HectorLooi said:

I saw the video on YouTube last week but I thought the acrylic sheet would get chewed up pretty quickly. Aluminium would probably be sturdier. 

I use a brass jawed pin vise from Cousins for inserting stubborn arbors. It holds the arbor very securely and so far has not scratched or damaged any arbors yet. 

Great idea. I've always wondered why nobody manufactures a winder like the types for clock mainsprings, which uses the original arbor and steel containment rings.

Can you imagine if clockmakers had to buy a different winder for every movement they worked on? ($$$$$$)

I think they used to make these in the past :

LGMainspringWinder.jpg

But in real life practice these old types probably weren't ideal, i.e. I'm guessing it was prone to errors and mainsprings kept getting damaged. Or maybe someone lost an eye 😄 . The Bergeon type winders replaced them as they are much more reliable for professionals.

I built a 3D printed design similar to that in the video, a while back. It will work. Though the biggest problem I had was my arbor would often slip and get badly scratched up, as it really is just floating there in a hole with opposing forces trying to twist it around. The second problem is the insertion step (pushing into the barrel), during which the mainspring tail end will usually refuse to go in properly if you don't push the whole thing out evenly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Zero said:

I think they used to make these in the past :

LGMainspringWinder.jpg

But in real life practice these old types probably weren't ideal, i.e. I'm guessing it was prone to errors and mainsprings kept getting damaged. Or maybe someone lost an eye 😄 . The Bergeon type winders replaced them as they are much more reliable for professionals.

I built a 3D printed design similar to that in the video, a while back. It will work. Though the biggest problem I had was my arbor would often slip and get badly scratched up, as it really is just floating there in a hole with opposing forces trying to twist it around. The second problem is the insertion step (pushing into the barrel), during which the mainspring tail end will usually refuse to go in properly if you don't push the whole thing out evenly.

Would you believe i have a similar  german made one of these that is adjustable in size. They actually do work but a bit fiddly to work with and not a go to tool. Its design only allows for pocketwatch mainspring and maybe a really big wristwatch.

On 5/8/2023 at 1:12 AM, HectorLooi said:

 I use a brass jawed pin vise from Cousins for inserting stubborn arbors. It holds the arbor very securely and so far has not scratched or damaged any arbors yet. 

Do you have a link for it HectorLooi please. I've had a look on cousins site but cant find any pinvices that have brass jaws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What bad practice. The reason you use watch mainspring  winders is so you do not distort the spring and so your fingers do not contaminate the spring because of the oils in your skin. He is touching the spring all the time.  I suggest if you go down this road wear finger cots. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, oldhippy said:

Wrong. Handling the mainspring makes it an issue to wear finger cots. 

Not if you are just demoing a technique on an old spring. I admit, that should be made clear in the video, but that wasn't a professionally made video, it's youtube!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hell0 @nevenbekriev. Thank you for your advice. I have removed the old setting using my staking set--I will keep the KIF spring, since it is still good.  I am awaiting the replacement setting, and will update when I do that. In the mean time, I looked at the escape wheel and it looks ok. What do you think?    
    • Aloha All, I recently bought this Seitz tool on eBay, but it is missing some pushers reamers.  I ended up ordering new parts for those that were missing before I received the actual Seitz tool (bad idea).   Upon inspecting the pushers/bits, I noticed 23 of the 56 provided with the set had no numbers. Further inspection revealed a huge difference in the quality of those unnumbered.  Do all Seitz pushers/bits have a number on them?  I'm pretty sure that 33 of the 56 I received are cheap Chinese knockoffs.  The worst part is that I ordered $80 of parts to replace the missing pushers/bits, and now I'm looking to return the tool. I'm not crazy, right? If these are Seitz parts, they should all be numbered, correct? The first two pictures are the Seitz (numbered), and the other pictures are the suspect parts.  Will I even be able to get a refund?  Thanks, Frank     
    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
    • So I found what I believe is the setting lever screw! Am I right in thinking the screw next to the click is the correct one for the setting lever? However if it is, it doesn't fit in the hole which I believe is for it! I can get the lever to sit nicely on the stem and line up with a hole, but the screw only goes as far as the shoulder and stops. It's as though the hole is too small! The dial side has been disassembled by the way, the other wheels are in my tray
×
×
  • Create New...