Jump to content

Setting wheel chamfer


Recommended Posts

Advice please. 

Am I correct is assuming that the setting wheel, when it has a chamfer, always has the chamfer edge placed down toward the sliding pinion?  The flat edge always to the top for contact with the plate that usually secures the minute wheel, hour wheel or other part of the keyless works.

Ross

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nucejoe said:

Thats how my common sense says it should be, yet I seen set mech working fine with set wheel installed upside down and no sign of wear. 

I always set them with the chamfer down. Some movements work fine with them either way, but I recently rebuilt an Omega and found the hand setting very stiff and not smooth. I found that I'd put the setting wheel with the chamfer side up - turned it over and all was well.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

GuyMontag, I am beginging to doubt my common sense now.

By intution one concludes , the chamfer is there to improve chance of mesh with the clutch. 

You don't believe me    !!!       ask Ross , he knows. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nucejoe said:

GuyMontag, I am beginging to doubt my common sense now.

By intution one concludes , the chamfer is there to improve chance of mesh with the clutch. 

You don't believe me    !!!       ask Ross , he knows. 

 

What is odd is that the 11AOACB and the 11ANACB are basically the same movement with quickset date added to the 11AOACB and pretty much everything else interchanges. But the 11ANACB the tech sheet does not call this out for the  setting wheel and every 11ANACB I've worked on had both of the setting wheels with the beveled edge facing down 🤷‍♂️

Edited by GuyMontag
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry for the anecdotal evidence, but whenever I have finished a watch and the time setting seems to grind, or has that 'gritty feeling' I have always found that the chamfer is facing up, when changing this things always seem smoother. I have never experienced the opposite so now I always put chamfer down, which aligns with most of the advice on here and many of the watch videos I have seen on line. I suppose there will always be exceptions to this rule, but I would think if you always put it down you will be making the correct call 99% of the time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, GuyMontag said:

The tech sheet for the Bulova 11AOACB calls out that of the two setting wheels, the one that meshes with the sliding pinion goes beveled side UP:


setting-wheel.thumb.jpg.a5259acd2ee6eabd7fb9961c6c9c7282.jpg

There's something else that is unconventional with Bulova's guidelines. Anyone else spotted it?

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mikepilk said:

The 'hairspring does not move freely .... but leans against the regulator pin'.

I knew that. Well, I do now that you've told me. I was just testing you...... Isn't it funny that something becomes obvious when someone points it out?

Edited by rossjackson01
grammar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

There's something else that is unconventional with Bulova's guidelines. Anyone else spotted it?

I did see that when I read the tech sheet but I have to admit that I don't follow it. Same with their advice on how to oil the top pivot of the sweep second wheel. which doesn't make sense to me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Forgot to mention that only demagnetize a balance when its in the movement, otherwise the magnetic field will snatch the coils and damage them
    • Sometimes a sticky hairspring might unravel after using a demagnetizer. But if you push the coils until they touch, they will stick together again. I find that brushing the coils gently while submerged in naptha the most effective way to cure a sticky hairspring. Sometimes it requires 2 or 3 washes to cure it. I often wondered what causes a hairspring to become sticky. The 9010 in the jewels are unlikely to drip onto the hairspring. The other possibility is the 9415 on the pallets. But then that's on the other side, below the balance. Can it "splash" onto the hairspring?  Looking at the stickiness and tenacity, I'm leaning towards 9415.
    • I was about to ask the same question, it sounds a lot like magnetism which is a quick fix (assuming you have access to the correct tool) and ideally something you should do anyway.
    • Nice! I have lately been buying up a handful of Arnex pieces on eBay because it is often obvious even without photos that they house a fine Unitas 6498. And many of the 1970s cases and "old timey themed" dials are irredeemably ugly so they are a cheap way to pickup great movements to power custom wristwatch projects. All of the ones I've bought were in like new condition, barely used assuming they were bought as graduation or retirement gifts in the 70s or 80s.
    • Walked by my local jeweler today and asked if I could dig around in his old watch case, and picked this guy up (along with a cool vintage compass and a Seiko kinetic5M62). My girlfriend's son asked if he could borrow one of my pocket watches for prom, so I thought if I can get this guy running it'd be a nice prom gift. Non-running. Felt like the balance was overbanked, but it turns out the train was jammed solid. Looks like it was just dried lubricant gluing the 3rd wheel in place, because it's clean as a whistle otherwise. Parts are in the ultrasonic right now.  
×
×
  • Create New...