Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It's an older TV.  Went to turn it on yesterday and nothing. It has power throw the cord. Fuse is good.  What is the next thing to check?

IMG_5447.JPG

IMG_5448.JPG

Posted

First you people are geniuses and someone here will know what to do.

Second no but I can't screw it up worse.

Third I don't even know the differences.

So what's the next step?

 

Posted

So video said get numbers off old board and order new board.  Looked on eBay and found a guy who will repair mine for $55.  He's done 117 and has 100% feedback so I think it's the way to go.

Thanks everyone.

Posted

So, electrolytic caps deteriorate over time. For linear power supplies, this is not a serious abrupt problem. However, for switch mode supplies which are 99% of the market, aging caps are a problem because ESR increases and the supply shuts down.

I have repaired my Samsung 42" twice...both times--caps.

I don't use it any more because I got a modern huge tv.

  • Haha 1
Posted

T V these days is just full of rubbish programs. I think its better that it doesn't work. I don't own a TV I haven't had one for about 15 years. This way I don't have to buy a licence to line the corrupt BBC. 

  • Like 3
Posted
  On 4/7/2023 at 10:47 PM, markr said:

First you people are geniuses and someone here will know what to do.

Expand  

in the old days of television repair that used to be companies I would publish service guides for the various televisions radios whatever. Don't know if those companies even exist anymore? The problem with working on electronic stuff it's the same as watch repair with a blindfold on your success is not guaranteed unless you can see what you're doing and you can't see what you're doing without the schematic unless well sometimes you can is have to be lucky or know what the problem is.

  On 4/7/2023 at 10:07 PM, markr said:

older TV

Expand  

you didn't say how old? I would start with the power supply but as it looks like a new design television the power supplies can get to be quite tricky then we go back to it be nice to have a schematic.

  On 4/8/2023 at 6:47 AM, oldhippy said:

This way I don't have to buy a licence to line the corrupt BBC

Expand  

this is America we don't need a license or have a corrupt BBC. but don't worry I'm sure we have somebody that's corrupt somewhere that's going to steal all of our money in the name of greater good.

  On 4/8/2023 at 6:47 AM, oldhippy said:

T V these days is just full of rubbish programs. I think its better that it doesn't work. I don't own a TV I haven't had one for about 15 years.

Expand  

then was so much stuff streaming do we even need a TV anymore?

 

  On 4/8/2023 at 2:55 AM, LittleWatchShop said:

I have repaired my Samsung 42" twice...both times--caps.

Expand  

in other words the days of the bad capacitors. Strangely enough the Samsung monitor I'm looking at had to replace the capacitors but it's been fine ever sense.

 

Posted (edited)
  On 4/8/2023 at 6:47 AM, oldhippy said:

T V these days is just full of rubbish programs. I think its better that it doesn't work. I don't own a TV I haven't had one for about 15 years. This way I don't have to buy a licence to line the corrupt BBC. 

Expand  

Rawhide at noon, Bonanza at 1:00, Gunsmoke at 2:00, Rifleman at 2:30...what's not to like?

Bad guys dead within 30 minutes or an hour!

Edited by LittleWatchShop
Posted

Hello markr,

I had a Samsung tv which did something very similar. I would agree with the others that it's likely to be a capacitor. Though one thing I would try before you start unsoldering things is perhaps giving it a good clean and remove any dust. Though from you're photos it looks clean.

I limped along the Samsung for around two years with regular internal cleaning. It used to switch itself on and off when it felt like it. The cause was dust settling and shorting the legs out on the components due to poor design. A combination of badly designed vents to let out heat and poorly oriented components was perfect for dust to settle on shorting out the legs!

Good luck and keep safe

  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Moebius 9010. A small drop on each end cap jewel (top and bottom)…enough to cover at least half the jewel, but not all the way to the edge. I was conservative.   I like this analogy. And yes, it’s imperfect, because surgeons don’t start with live people. 😂 It’s definitely one of the things I learned with this watch, where I’d fix one issue, but then introduce 1-2 others, often not necessarily getting at the root cause of the “illness.” Well, this watch wasn’t totally destroyed…Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to do enough up-front diagnosis before I started pulling everything apart. This was one major lesson learned to me, but tbh, I don’t think I would have learned it had I not pulled everything apart and seen the interactions of all the different systems (just inside the balance assembly itself!). I have a few other Hamilton 974s that I’ll be able to work on more thoughtfully. I definitely heard your advice, and I think a few others echoed it, but I’m fairly certain I would have introduced more problems by attempting that fix. I don’t have the necessary skill or tools to (1) bend the cock and (2) assess exactly how much it has been bent. I can’t machine a brass plate to attach the cock while bending, I can’t measure the amount of deflection I’ve introduced. And it’s the kind of thing where botching it seemed like it would be irreversible. I’ll attempt to look at the hairspring to see if it’s touching anywhere. The central challenge is that I don’t have a reference point. I don’t have that for end shake or for anything else. I could compare to my ST36, but that seems like an apples-oranges comparison to me (new movement v. 100+ years old). That’s one of the main challenges for me when learning a lot of this stuff – you create reference points yourself! The next thing I was thinking of getting was a JKA Feintaster bench micrometer, tbh. After watching Alex Hamilton measure staffs and pivots, it seemed like it would be a good purchase. They’re just expensive. I’ll need to sell a watch or two first. 🙂  A lathe seems like something where I need to collect more experience before I pick one up. Perhaps you convince me otherwise.
    • Thanks for the reply Andy, I will take a look .
    • I don't think @praezis / Frank actually has a website. If you want his software message him and you'll get the info. I've used Witschi LCD and Vibrograf paper machines since last century, and it really is the best of both worlds. Picks up anything, however dirty (looking at you Witschi), with a readable result.   If you pay for the pro, it tells you exactly where the poise error is for dynamic poising, and it's damn accurate. I can't speak highly enough about this software. Some mics don't work, some do, you might have to solder something, but in all the above Frank can help with a solution. And it's unbelievably affordable.
    • Well, as I have said not once, for the beginners in watchmaking, the hairspring, especially when there is overcoil, is the source of the most of the problems. This is the case here too. The end shake... I told You to regulate it by bending the cock. If it was done, then would be no wondering if the shim is seated correctly every time. You still have to understand how much end shake is normal and correct. One exercise for this purpose:  remove the hairspring from balance. Put the balance in the movement with the cock. Use thin sharp pointed tweezers to grasp the balance staff  where the hairspring collet seats and try to move the staff up/down. The amount of movement should be more or less as much as in escape wheel or pallet fork arbor. In the same time You will see how easy the balance rotates when it is free and without hairspring. Moving the balance up/down by holding it by the rim is not the same, as it forces it to tilt and some shaking may be result of the radial free play of the pivots in the  bearings even if there is no endshake at all. Of course, You can grasp the roller too. You can also grasp the rim, but observe the staff movement, not the rim shake. One should be able to check and say if there is end shake and if it is normal without hesitation, no matter if the movements works well or not at all, and not to wonder if the reason for the not normal working is endshake. Now about the hairspring. You spring is touching somewhere. The fact that this slight lifting of the stud changed the situation proves it. The spring probably touches the arms of the balance, but You are the one that can look at the spring, so it is up to You only to find where it is touching. The spring should be parallel to the plane of balance and thus on equal distances from the cock  or from the balance arms in every position of the balance when it rotates. The coils of the spring must not touch each other. The overcoil also should be parallel and not touching the cock. The spring should not touch (be on some distance from) the regulator pins or the stud bottom. All this must be true also in DU position, not only in DD.  This is achieved by slight bending and twisting close to the stud  or of the overcoil.
×
×
  • Create New...