Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all,

hope you had a nice new years. 
I was working on a UG 218 and am finishing it up when I noticed the microrotor weight rattled. Upon inspection the axel seem wormed and I replaced it. However when replacing it I noticed that that the weight itself is two parts. The first part is the weight and the second part is the the jewels that attach to the axel. The two parts are held together with pins that run the length. and on my weight the pins are no longer holding together tight so the weight is pinging off the second jeweled part. My question is, is it possible to to tighten these two pins or do I need a whole new weight? I have circled the two pins I’m speaking of in green. 
 

 

D56C14A0-4D6D-44FF-87D2-01E95CBF6353.jpeg

Posted

The photo is not high enough quality to see clearly, but is the fixing screw missing (from the hole between the pins)? If it is present, it should be possible to fix the two parts tightly together. I also cannot see the jewels you are referring to.

Posted
5 hours ago, Klassiker said:

The photo is not high enough quality to see clearly, but is the fixing screw missing (from the hole between the pins)? If it is present, it should be possible to fix the two parts tightly together. I also cannot see the jewels you are referring to.

I have attached a photo without the fixing plate 

86982433-EFDD-4927-A8EF-F53DDA6EB2CD.jpeg

Posted

 Google Universal geneve 218-2 micorotor parts, its an schematic diagram of the parts by UG and speaks of repair plus list of parts in the microrotor assembly.

Its the following link, but it wont open on my device.

https://images.app.goo.gl/pxJmmp3LYffnNiMT8

So it is repairable, if you identify  and find replacement for worn parts. 

Good luck

 

 

 

 

 

37 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

 Google Universal geneve 218-2 micorotor parts, its an schematic diagram of the parts by UG and speaks of repair plus list of parts in the microrotor assembly.

Its the following link, but it wont open on my device.

https://images.app.goo.gl/pxJmmp3LYffnNiMT8

So it is repairable, if you identify  and find replacement for worn parts. 

Good luck

 

 

 

 

 

Try this link 

https://universalgenevepolerouter.com/repairing-a-worn-microtor-from-calibers-215-218-68-69/

  • Like 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

 Google Universal geneve 218-2 micorotor parts, its an schematic diagram of the parts by UG and speaks of repair plus list of parts in the microrotor assembly.

Its the following link, but it wont open on my device.

https://images.app.goo.gl/pxJmmp3LYffnNiMT8

So it is repairable, if you identify  and find replacement for worn parts. 

Good luck

 

 

 

 

 

Try this link 

https://universalgenevepolerouter.com/repairing-a-worn-microtor-from-calibers-215-218-68-69/

The issue is that the part is sold as the entire oscillating weight. I’m wondering if there is a way to tighten those pins down that are attaching the weight itself to the jeweled portion of the weight. 

Posted

Will you show ( on the diagram ) the worn psrts in your microtor. 

I can't quite visulaize what you mean by " tightening the pins"  

Rgds

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Will you show ( on the diagram ) the worn psrts in your microtor. 

I can't quite visulaize what you mean by " tightening the pins"  

Rgds

 

The two pins I circled run the length of the weight and hold the jeweled part to the actual weight. These are loose on my weight and causing the weight to sag away from the jewel part and no longer rotate.  

374E7DE8-F579-459E-9065-A61142327F85.jpeg

Posted
5 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

I see , said the blind man.

Proper repair of this is above my head,  need help and advice from master @nickelsilver

Good luck pal.

 

Thanks for your help hope someone can offer some clarity on this topic. The oscillating weights are expensive and hard to find. And the condition of them isn’t guaranteed to be good. Preferably I would like to service this part

Posted
4 hours ago, dibs1 said:

Thanks for your help hope someone can offer some clarity on this topic. The oscillating weights are expensive and hard to find. And the condition of them isn’t guaranteed to be good. Preferably I would like to service this part

 

4 hours ago, dibs1 said:

hope someone can offer some clarity on this topic. 

 Advice from Nickelsilver will be clarity and technically  to the max.  fingers crossed it doesn't get to making parts which usually add up  more expensive that factory made parts. 

I have a buren with micorotor worn axle , this mech seems to be a major culprit.  

Lovely UG , and my favourate brand.  

Good luck.

 

Posted

Those pins just locate the locking plate, and they do have some play (should be oblong holes) with the plate to allow it to slide into position. The plate engages a groove on the axle, are you sliding the plate into position? Normally it would have to be in get the screw in; but the plate can wear where it contacts the axle, and the axle can wear, allowing more movement of the rotor.

 

But also, the axle itself can wear where it bears on the rotor jewels. That's tricky to fix as the axle isn't a simple round part; the axle is (as far as I can see) welded to a semitrangular base screwed to the underside of the auto mechanism. I started to make one a couple of years ago but ended up finding the part (the client found the part).

 

So if you have vertical play it's likely the locking plate or axle groove or both that are worn. If you have lateral play the axle is worn where it contacts the jewels in the rotor. The pins don't do anything except locate the plate.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

Those pins just locate the locking plate, and they do have some play (should be oblong holes) with the plate to allow it to slide into position. The plate engages a groove on the axle, are you sliding the plate into position? Normally it would have to be in get the screw in; but the plate can wear where it contacts the axle, and the axle can wear, allowing more movement of the rotor.

 

But also, the axle itself can wear where it bears on the rotor jewels. That's tricky to fix as the axle isn't a simple round part; the axle is (as far as I can see) welded to a semitrangular base screwed to the underside of the auto mechanism. I started to make one a couple of years ago but ended up finding the part (the client found the part).

 

So if you have vertical play it's likely the locking plate or axle groove or both that are worn. If you have lateral play the axle is worn where it contacts the jewels in the rotor. The pins don't do anything except locate the plate.

Thank you, for this amazing response providing great clarity. So, I replaced the axle I do not think that should be the issue. Ill have to check the other parts you listed and see if I’m fitting the plate correctly. It seems to my knowledge  at least that the weight seems properly engaged but that it sags off the axle. Ill have to take a closer look and see what it is causing the sag and then grind against the plate. It looks like the axle portion of the weight is tight but the weight is sagging off the axle. 
 

 

 

 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Was able to resolve the issue with some clear jewelers epoxy. I put a small drop between the plate and the weight and this completely resolved the issue and now the weight swings freely without issue. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi All, This is my first waltham (wrist) watch, and during disassembly I found a set mainspring which I would like to replace. I checked the usual websites 17jewels, ranfft but I could not identify this movement and I am not sure if the MS I found has the factory specifications/dimensions. My barrel inside diameter is 11.5mm, arbor is 3.7mm, height of the barrel is 1.9mm. The spring i found has 1.4mm thickness and 1.65mm height. Would anyone know this movement and what MS did it have exactly? (I only have these pics made with my microscope during disassembly the whole mvmnt does not fit and the mvmnt is currently in a cleaned state in pieces waiting for me to put it together again) Br, Lui
    • One of the problems for people helping he is we rely on your eyes on the watch. So it's worse but what does that mean? Is it on a timing machine how did you do the before-and-after so it be nice if you give us a little better answer then since apparently this discussion is coming to an end in your giving up I thought I go back and look at the very first page let me quote something So generally speaking it's in great condition? For future reference what you think about several things we tell newbies to work on pocket watches because they're big. Typically I tell people to get a Chinese clone of a 6497 as it's a new pocket watch and it's running. Newbies need to work on a running watch to see what a running watch looks like to evaluate to disassemble and reassemble not just one time but a lot of times to learn how to disassemble and reassemble and then you practice oiling you do this a lot and after you completed doing it a lot of times you do it again because you really do need the practice The problem with starting on a pocket watch like the one that you chose its old and it's probably not going to run if you clean it. As you can see they need repairs and adjustments conceivably lots of them and hear the person on the field you're making the observations that you still don't have the skills to make the observations it's going to be a problem for all of us. Like for instance it's in great condition when exactly did that mean? It's always nice to evaluate the watch before disassembly so did your great condition pocket watch run initially did it run in all positions what exactly was the assessment before you disassemble It Excellent device because at happens to all of us. Put a watch back together take the balance wheel in and out of multiple of times put it on the timing machine and how that looks really bad? Then notice the hairspring has magically relocated to someplace else. I do find it really sad that it didn't work out? Six pages of I guess we wasted our time you learned nothing? The problem with watch repair is when we don't always see this in popular YouTube videos would be the word repair is involved in an ordered you repairs you have to do diagnostics and as you can see learning how to repair in doing diagnostics on a watch takes a long time the learner I would like to think that you may be learned something and six pages of discussion if nothing else repairing a vintage pocket watch isn't as easy as the videos look like on YouTube
    • I also bought such tool and it's great. Absolutely nothing to complain about. It looks great, feels right and works like a charm.
    • I've been meaning to report back - I bought a Horia clone last month, making a point to pay over $100 instead of trying for one of the rock bottom priced sellers. I think I paid $107 at the time, and the one I received is good. There is almost no noticeable sideshake to the spindle, none on the micrometer head and it has the necessary reference mark on the frame. I have not examined my pushers under magnification though. I assume they're not worse than any others.
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
×
×
  • Create New...