Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I normally just use a little rodico  and leave them alone but these are almost covered in oil.  What is a safe way to clean? I have a watchermaster  ultrasonic for parts and a regular ultrasonic for cases and bands also lighter fluid and onedip.

IMG_5248 (1).JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

quick dip in lighter fluid and a blast of air to dry it

At one time now banned of course Freon would've been really good. Used in the electronic industry and I don't think it would hurt anything it would definitely evaporate relatively quickly. Lighter fluid is probably harmless But I would not leave it in there very long just a quick dip to get the job done and hopefully will be okay. Then definitely do not wear use anything with ultrasonic bizarre stuff you do not want to do oriole damage something. Then getting replacement components for something like this is challenging to use one be careful not to damage anything.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd swish them around in warm water with dish soap (Fairy Liquid if in Europe, Dawn in the U.S.), rinse well in clean water, quick dip in iso alcohol, pat dry and then dry with warm air. This is what the old electronics guys I know would do for circuit boards. Normally I wouldn't worry about the time in the alcohol, but Bulova was treading in new territory with the size of wire on these coils so I don't know what kind of lacquer they used on the wire and to coat the coils after winding.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

I'd swish them around in warm water with dish soap (Fairy Liquid if in Europe, Dawn in the U.S.), rinse well in clean water, quick dip in iso alcohol, pat dry and then dry with warm air. This is what the old electronics guys I know would do for circuit boards.

We could pretend this is a Tektronix oscilloscope in which case you can run it through a dishwasher. I used to belong to the Tektronix users group and they were designed that you could Literally hose off the entire oscilloscope run the whole thing to the dishwasher run the boards through the dishwasher everything was meant to be washable in water with soap. The only catch here is were those coils designed to get wet?

Looks like I'm wrong? Checking both the 214 at 218 service manuals I snipped out the relevant sections. They're both identical you are supposed to use ultrasonic cleaning for the watch and you can clean the coils in your benzene cup. I have an aversion to benzene or even the phrase because one of those will kill you eventually and the other one probably won't. So today we probably don't have anything that's called benzene in our cup I would check whatever you're using though to make sure it doesn't attack the plastic and or the protective coating and I definitely wouldn't leave it in there very long.

 

 

 

coil benzene cleaning.JPG

218 benzene cup.JPG

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

IPA is common to used in the electronics industry to wash circuit boards today.  But this is mostly for cleaning off flux, not oil.  I think it would be fine to use, but IPA doesn't seem dissolve oil as well as naptha/lighter fluid/benzine does.  Those however are not typically used to wash circuit boards.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just got these good quality diamond files from the bay for Just a fiver, we all love a bargain dont we. Brand names are J.K.Smit  and Triefus, two old diamond tool makers so not cheap crap.
    • Its a touch under ive just remeasured it and added a wrist shot. Unbelievably it was £13  plus 3 postage. You dont find watches that nice for that money every day of the week. Maybe removing the epilame in the oil region improves the purpose of it. We may know very soon as i emailed Episurf 4 hours ago to ask that exact question. 🤞they are happy to provide an answer for us. How do you fancy trying a stearic acid vapour treatment experiment  H .  Shall i have a go this afternoon ?
    • That's the size of my grandfather's Ernest Borel watch. Definitely not a lady's watch! 👍
    • Thanks H It does have a big crown for the watch , it could be considered a ladies watch these days i guess, it measures 33mm case 36mm with that large crown 18mm lug space. A tad small for a guy of today, but still very wearable. The photo was deceptive so here it is adorning my 7 1/4 " wrist. It need some love to make it run better. The hair coils are touching so running a bit fast at the moment,  not caused by magnetism, and maybe just a clean and a service. The dtal is in fantastic shape.
    • That's one beautiful timepiece! Love the big crown in proportion to the case. Perhaps a ladies' watch, but I don't think so. I have a "modern Ingersoll" watch, but it has nothing to do with the original brand (Miyota 9015 movement). Interesting synonym for synthetic oils! 😆 There is, of course, a limit to how large a volume of oil epilame can bind and hold in place. If the oleophobic effect is too strong then it can become a problem. I'm not sure where I heard or read it, but as I understand it, the active ingredient in a bottle of epilame is extremely small and more than 99% of the contents of the bottle is just a transfer agent. If the active ingredient becomes too concentrated, which it can become over time, or if the product is of poor quality, the oleophobic effect is amplified. This in turn causes the applied oil to look like a gummed-up ball on the surface of the treated part. If that happens, we know that the active ingredient has become too concentrated. What we want is for the oil to bind but not to the point where it is formed into an excessively round ball on the surface. The highlighted text in the patent that you refer to describes well the problem that can arise with too high a concentration of the active ingredient. However, I would be extremely surprised if the entire amount of oil leaves the treated surface as water on wax would. At present, I am convinced that the analogy between wax and water on the one hand and epilame and oil on the other is incorrect. Epilame is described as binding and that is also my absolute experience. Epilame probably has some repelling effect but that is not its main purpose and that is not how epilame is designed and works. The method of abrading the epilame treatment from the section of the pallet stones coming in contact with the escape wheel teeth seems after even more research to be well established, but if it actually works, if so how and why is beyond what I can currently understand. Perhaps it is just to do and trust that it is based on well-established experience. I am, after all, inclined to think so.
×
×
  • Create New...