Jump to content

How Do You Refill Your Oil Dishes?


Recommended Posts

Maybe this is a dumb question but how do you refill your oil dishes without wasting three months worth of oil dripping down the rim of the oil jar? 

I've tried straight up pour it in. This results in drips down the edge of the bottle.

I've tried polarity tricks similar to what I've used when pouring water (use a chopstick is a cup to avoid drips, etc). I this case I use an acrylic stir stick as a pour stick. Results have been better but still wasting some oil. 

What else can I do? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Paulj said:

I'm also very new but filling the oil cups I use only requires a few drops in the cup..... I just dip my widest oiler into the vial of oil then rest it in the hollow of the cup.  The oil will run into the cup... rinse and repeat.

Screenshot by Snip My at Dec 11, 2022 at 10:56:05 PM.png

The most sensible answer by far.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure this question came up a few weeks ago? I use my No 1 tweezers, dip it into the oil container, then transfer it over to the cup - making sure the tips of the tweezers contact that base of the cup - and open them up. Voila - usually enough so I only need to do this once. Obviously you want to pre and post clean your tweezers when doing this using liberal amounts of IPA

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, gbyleveldt said:

I'm pretty sure this question came up a few weeks ago? I use my No 1 tweezers, dip it into the oil container, then transfer it over to the cup - making sure the tips of the tweezers contact that base of the cup - and open them up. Voila - usually enough so I only need to do this once. Obviously you want to pre and post clean your tweezers when doing this using liberal amounts of IPA

It certainly did come up Gert, then went down a hare horifice as to the reasons why a syringe shouldn't be used. I kept well out of the discussion 😌

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, gbyleveldt said:

I'm pretty sure this question came up a few weeks ago? I use my No 1 tweezers, dip it into the oil container, then transfer it over to the cup - making sure the tips of the tweezers contact that base of the cup - and open them up. Voila - usually enough so I only need to do this once. Obviously you want to pre and post clean your tweezers when doing this using liberal amounts of IPA

Clever! I'm going to try this out. Thanks! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use tweezers as well, but just to be different I use my No.5's. another method I saw recently was to get some 1ml syringes and the finest needles available, the fill the syringe and use the needle to transfer the tiny amount needed, then keep the syringe with the rest of its contents safe until a top up is needed.  That is probably one of the less wasteful methods I have seen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it depends upon the size of the  bottle but my hairspring tweezers work quite nicely. Squeeze them together insert into the bottle. It will I Or action holds a nice drop near the tip place the tip into your oil container open the tweezers and the drop will go into the oil. Just remember to keep her tweezers clean afterwards.

I've seen a bottle of older Elgin oil or it actually had in the bottle itself a small glass rod with a little ball on the end.  which seemed like a nice idea for getting oil out but you would have to have a bigger bottle and typically are Swiss bottles are a fraction of the size of the Elgin  bottle. Then later on they There are using tiny squeeze bottles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...

Thanks!  I haven't started oiling yet, but I want to know before I start wasting the stuff - it is too expensive to waste a molecule!

I may try all of the above suggestions  with a cheaper oil to get my "feet wet" (and then they get slippery and I fall down! 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is not rare at all, the dial code and case code don't usually match.
    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
×
×
  • Create New...