Jump to content

Making/finding a case screw for Elgin 539


Recommended Posts

At first blush, this seems like a simple task.  I have made screws and have been happy with the results.  However, I am bedeviled by the threads on this one.  As best I can tell, the Martin Fils L and B screwplates will not work.  I had the bright idea to just make a brass screw and use the baseplate of the watch as the cutting tool...nah...I don't like that.

So, I am looking around the list of suppliers I have bookmarked plus ebay.

If anyone has a clever idea, I am all ears.

This is helpful...NOT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

As best I can tell, the Martin Fils L and B screwplates will not work

that sounds like a Swiss name? Swiss screw in a American watch?

22 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

This is helpful...NOT.

are you suggesting that Elgin doesn't use Elgin screws and their watch?

I suppose it's possible if the Elgin screws thread size don't fit for the casings screw than the casings screw may be considered a casing components. In other words like in the days of pocket watches they could go in anybody's made case so conceivably maybe there's a standard for casings screws. In which that would mean that anyone's casings screw would conceivably fit. As long as is the right size of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JohnR725 said:

that sounds like a Swiss name? Swiss screw in a American watch?

are you suggesting that Elgin doesn't use Elgin screws and their watch?

I suppose it's possible if the Elgin screws thread size don't fit for the casings screw than the casings screw may be considered a casing components. In other words like in the days of pocket watches they could go in anybody's made case so conceivably maybe there's a standard for casings screws. In which that would mean that anyone's casings screw would conceivably fit. As long as is the right size of course.

No, I am not suggesting that. That would have been really dumb of me to. My point, oblique as it was, is that knowing thread pitch is useless knowledge if I am not in possession of a die to cut them.

Re Martin Fils...it is not impossible for an American company to adopt a thread standard of the Swiss. Or is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

No, I am not suggesting that. That would have been really dumb of me to. My point, oblique as it was, is that knowing thread pitch is useless knowledge if I am not in possession of a die to cut them.

the question is which came first the die or the tap? The reality is anyone skilled in machining can have either if they just have one. My problem with discussion is I do have a set of Elgin taps they do show up on eBay from time to time so all the Elgin screws can be made today because the taps still remain

but I still wonder especially with pocket watches weather case screws are considered a casing component and maybe they use some other thread size. because so many times cases are not necessarily made by the company who has the watch in the case

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

the question is which came first the die or the tap? The reality is anyone skilled in machining can have either if they just have one. My problem with discussion is I do have a set of Elgin taps they do show up on eBay from time to time so all the Elgin screws can be made today because the taps still remain

but I still wonder especially with pocket watches weather case screws are considered a casing component and maybe they use some other thread size. because so many times cases are not necessarily made by the company who has the watch in the case

 

I wish I had a set of those. Will start watching for them on ebay.

This particular watch is the A11, which as you know, was military spec'd.  Thus it is likely all Elgin.

@JohnR725

Next time you are doing nothing with a camera in your hand, take a picture of your tap and die set so I can salivate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar.  I think its because it gets into their cleaning solutions Mike. Theirs or anyone else's that services the watch next time, or if they need to strip back and rebuild. Could preclean but thats all time for a pro.
    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
    • I think attaching a nut to the lid to pull it off is the least destructive, any damage damage on the outside is going to an easier fix than any created when trying to push it out from the inside. Scratching up the inside of the lid , mainspring or arbor bearing will be risk. Just my opinion.
    • yes the things we read in the universe I did see some where it was either difficult to clean off or it contaminated the cleaning fluid there was some issue with cleaning. I was trying to remember something about grease where as opposed to a substance of a specific consistency they were suggesting it had a base oil with something to thicken it. That conceivably could indicate that the two could separate and that would be an issue. But there is something else going on here that I had remembered so I have a link below and the description of the 9501 notice the word that I highlighted? Notice that word appears quite a bit on this particular page like 9415 has that property all so they 8200 mainspring grease and that definitely has to be mixed up when you go to use it because it definitely separates. just in case you didn't remember that nifty word there is a Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thixotropy   https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases I wonder if what you're seeing is the boron nitride left behind after cleaning. In other words it's the high-pressure part of the grease and it's probably embedding itself into the metal which is why it doesn't clean off and shouldn't be a problem?
    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
×
×
  • Create New...