Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi!

As it was to be expected, I ran into troubles in my first restoration (see introduction post). Mainspring was broken, and I don’t seem to be able to find it. These are the measurements:

Barrel inside: 22.0 mm
Mainspring thickness: 0.2mm
Mainspring heigth: 2.25mm
Mainspring length (putting the pieces together): 790 mm

The movement looks to me like a Roskopf Patent (1a??), and the mainspring seems to have and additional insert where it attaches to. (See attached pictures).

Any advice would be highly appreciated! Thank you!!!

693BCF78-C30C-49D9-B1F8-5CD0849B4A14.jpeg

C0050296-7FC3-4146-AA40-2DE3154D33AA.jpeg

3FF1F2E8-E899-4231-8534-BF785C3E396C.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi that is an old guy  30s/40s cylinder movement,   the language looks like Spanish/portugese    There seems to be no distinguishing marks on the plates. Other members will need to have a look, its not one I recognise and I dont think you will find it on the pocketwatchdatabase.com site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the best I could find @Cousins. Looks like this could be too short but not sure how much extra length is made up with the bridle insert.

2.20 x .20 x 540 x 17 TR- End

GR6280TR

However GR 6240. - TR is probably the spring you need.It is so if gutsy under strength and is for a barrel of 19 but the length is  never to your estimated length ..

2.20. X 0.17x 680  x19

Edited by clockboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, clockboy said:

This is the best I could find @Cousins. Looks like this could be too short but not sure how much extra length is made up with the bridle insert.

2.20 x .20 x 540 x 17 TR- End

GR6280TR

However GR 6240. - TR is probably the spring you need.It is so if gutsy under strength and is for a barrel of 19 but the length is  never to your estimated length ..

2.20. X 0.17x 680  x19

Thanks a lot for your answer. Probably this is a stupid question but… if I can’t find the exact measures… could I use any of the two you mentioned? If so, how would it affect the functionality of the watch? (I.e. being different length or for a different barrel)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first spring GR6280TR is available from Cousins UK. If the spring dimensions  you supplied are correct then it will work but it won’t run for 8 days because it is short in length. However GR 6240. - TR Seems a better fit but I could not find one for sale. There some Roskopf mainsprings on eBay but not sure of the sizes.

Edited by clockboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, watchweasol said:

cylinder movement,

Very casually the balance looks like for cylinder but look carefully there is a lever and a weird escape wheel?

 

12 hours ago, albertopveiga said:

The movement looks to me like a Roskopf Patent (1a??), and the mainspring seems to have and additional insert where it attaches to. (See attached pictures).

I've seen the weird insert before I guess is there to keep people from over winding the watch..

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can never be sure the spring that's in the watch is the correct spring; it's good to double check the height in particular (especially if it's proving troublesome to find a replacement). If you have a micrometer, check the height of the barrel to the lip inside, then measure the thickness of the barrel end and subtract that. That, minus about 0.05mm is the maximum height of the spring.

 

In the Generale Ressorts book they list about a dozen refs for Roskopf; for a 22mm barrel they have a couple but with spring heights of 1.90 or 2.60. There are a few for 2.20 height, but for significantly thinner and shorter springs.

 

If you aren't used to searching Cousins' list, go to mainsprings by size, put in the height you want and search it, then you can scroll through all springs with that height. I see there's a 2.20 x 0.21 x 780 which is pretty close to what you have.

20220823_095554.jpg

Edited by nickelsilver
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well...

First things first: thanks all for all the advice! In the end, and given the fact that the spring was broken towards the outer part, I found a way to fix it using the weird insert. I mounted it and voilá... working!

I have ordered a couple of springs with similar characteristics, so I will try when they arrived. For now, the good news is that the restoration is almost complete.

Unfortunately, I broke one of the very deteriorated hands when removing them, so that´s the nex struggle! but, as you can see below, the before (not running) and after (already running) photos, the difference is noticeable, and I´m really proud that I managed to disassemble, clean, fix and assemble again this nice watch.

Thank you!

IMG_6300.jpg

IMG_6260.jpg

On 8/23/2022 at 9:55 AM, nickelsilver said:

You can never be sure the spring that's in the watch is the correct spring; it's good to double check the height in particular (especially if it's proving troublesome to find a replacement). If you have a micrometer, check the height of the barrel to the lip inside, then measure the thickness of the barrel end and subtract that. That, minus about 0.05mm is the maximum height of the spring.

 

In the Generale Ressorts book they list about a dozen refs for Roskopf; for a 22mm barrel they have a couple but with spring heights of 1.90 or 2.60. There are a few for 2.20 height, but for significantly thinner and shorter springs.

 

If you aren't used to searching Cousins' list, go to mainsprings by size, put in the height you want and search it, then you can scroll through all springs with that height. I see there's a 2.20 x 0.21 x 780 which is pretty close to what you have.

20220823_095554.jpg

Thank you so much. I was finally checking in Cousin´s list and ended up exacty in that list! I´m still waiting for the spring I ordered. The only available that looked similar (GR6840TR). Still waiting for it unfortunately. Indeed I suspected what you mentioned about not to trust the current mainspring. Definitely this watch has been already through a few services in 100 years!

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I remembered that when Lititz Watch Technicum's YouTube channel existed, they had a video about polishing. As I recall, many experts thought that video was among the best on the subject of polishing. It's a real shame that their videos are no longer available and I've been in touch with them regularly to see if they can get these videos back. Unfortunately, it seems that these videos are gone forever. The last message I received from them on 21 January read: "I'm sorry, but not yet. In a nutshell: the school is scheduled to be shut down next year - a new school is bring opened in Dallas, Texas. Because of that all video access is blocked. If a decision is made to not close the school, then at some point the videos will likely be made available. We just do not know that yet. So, just check in again in a month or three; sorry I can't be more specific than that." Well, as I recall, there was a section in the video that was about how to preserve the edges of a watch case, that is, how to avoid rounding off the edges when using a mop wheel. I don't remember all the details but what I do remember is that it's about keeping a high speed on the mop wheel and keeping a light pressure on it. I didn't think of this when I was polishing the case back but the next time I'll try it and see what difference it makes.
    • Good idea, I  was thinking of something similar but using a drill press.  Apologies, all the other comments have just appeared.  I was replying to @HectorLooi , the chain pusher is a good idea too.
    • Now thats a real man's tool press 👍. I have one just like it in my back garden for when just CANT fix a watch . Its not something i have had to do yet, @Waggybut wouldn't any type of press be able to do this ? What about an adapted chain link  extractor work or a micrometer with some sleeve pushers made to slot over the ends. @Waggy Found something that could work Scott, comes with different size pins and pushers. Only bit that would need making is a round former to support the inside of the case, a piece of stout timber, bit of oak or mdf might do it. What i like about this one is the pin is pushed in, its in a sliding sleeve so it doesn't turn while its being driven. This has 4 pin sizes and 3 stumps as well so it will come in for other applications, the pins could be adapted to take other accessories from jewelling tools. I've just ordered one myself for some play time. 
    • So I purchased this one based on my case number being listed. (Unless my case number is incorrect. The last digits are faint)
    • I have the same tool from AliExpress and get the same anxiety when when using it. But you have to admit it looks awesome on your tool shelf. Makes you look like a pro. 🤣 Looking at the photo of the Horotec tool, it looks equally flimsy. It probably comes from the same factory. I was thinking of using the pushers supplied with the tool and making a hand tool from a cranked jeweller's punch. I'll grind off the tip of the punch and drill a hole at the end to fit the pusher in. The cranked shank would be able to clear the watch case give a straight in-line axis to exert force to tap the pendant tube out. Should be robust enough to last several lifetimes. I wonder why nobody makes it. 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...