Jump to content

Introduction And A Question


Recommended Posts

Hello all!

 

A few weeks back, I had no idea of the definition of the term "watchmaker". All started with a new watch with an oversize band. Ever since then I've been online downing information by the gallon. Got my hands on some tools and started studying. All the tools aren't in yet, still waiting on a few to be delivered.

 

Basically, I want to repair watches as a hobby, and go from there if the interest is greater than that of a hobbyist.

 

That said, my father has a handful of watches that need new bands, but when I came home from work tonight there was a surprise waiting for me. I haven't a clue how to open it, beginning to think it's a solid back. The crystal is shot anyway and needs to be replaced. No idea as to specific model or date, any help would be appreciated. Picture attached. The brand is Waltham, the dial reads "17 Jewels, Automatic, Shock Resistant". At the very bottom in very small lettering it states "Swiss". I'm guessing the crystal is merely plastic and easily replaced, but that's a guess. A crystal lift is on my list anyway.

 

He has no problem with me learning on it due to its condition. The finish is damaged and the crystal makes the dial completely unreadable unless at a sharp angle. Seems like a great project to start with, in my uneducated opinion.

At the moment it sits in my drawer, ticking away. If I can give it a new crystal, clean it, and maybe do something with the finish, I'd love to wear it. That said, I'm very happy to be here, looking forward to conversing with all of you and delving into a wonderful new hobby!

post-126-0-34772800-1394516845_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

Welcome to the forums, you will find watch repairing to be a fascinating hobby. The watch shown looks ideal to practice on as it's doubtful you could make it much worse. :-) You will find plenty of advice available on here. Good Luck with your new hobby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do indeed! Back and a side profile. I've gone over the case with a 5x and a 10x loupe. Cheapie things, the one good one I ordered isn't in yet. I saw one spot that looks like it may possibly be a notch in the case, but that could be wear or damage, or my eyes playing tricks on me.

 

Am I incorrect in my guess that the crystal is just old and weathered perspex?

 

I feel bad for this watch. Spent years neglected in a drawer in a garage. She'll be like brand new if it kills me. :)

post-126-0-98684400-1394602454_thumb.jpg

post-126-0-06699200-1394602469_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do indeed! Back and a side profile. I've gone over the case with a 5x and a 10x loupe. Cheapie things, the one good one I ordered isn't in yet. I saw one spot that looks like it may possibly be a notch in the case, but that could be wear or damage, or my eyes playing tricks on me.

 

Am I incorrect in my guess that the crystal is just old and weathered perspex?

 

I feel bad for this watch. Spent years neglected in a drawer in a garage. She'll be like brand new if it kills me. :)

 

The glass is perspex. It has a seconds hand so could be a high dome, but I would order both High and Low dome to see if you can get away with the low dome as it will look nicer - depends on wether it fouls the second hand or not.

 

The chrome is quite worn on the case, down to the brass I wager - that will be a bigger challenge than the glass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love bringing watches back from the brink! This Garrard come to me looking less than top a New Glass, full service,new Hirsch strap and of course re-plating, the face I decided not to touch as it isnt that bad and I think any work could ruin it. I wish I had taken a photo of the back of the lugs and the back of the case as it was a mess but hey ho without further ado.

Before

8615546813_1fed3a8386.jpg

IMG_1646 by Jorrit and Hillary, on Flickr

8615543359_a133e15882.jpg

IMG_1648 by Jorrit and Hillary, on Flickr

8616645072_b0f7e432e0.jpg

IMG_1650 by Jorrit and Hillary, on Flickr

And after

8717162732_77bd0ac9a2.jpg

Untitled by Jorrit and Hillary, on Flickr

8716045703_a366c649d6.jpg

Untitled by Jorrit and Hillary, on Flickr

8717161026_f6787f2905.jpg

Untitled by Jorrit and Hillary, on Flickr

I am really pleased with it Scott at Easy electroplating was really pleasant to deal with and kept me updated at every step of the way.

So what do you think? financially not really worth it, but I wont be selling (for a while anyway!) so worth it in my mind

Hope you get yours sorted its a nice little timepiece

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am really pleased with it Scott at Easy electroplating was really pleasant to deal with and kept me updated at every step of the way.

So what do you think? financially not really worth it, but I wont be selling (for a while anyway!) so worth it in my mind

Hope you get yours sorted its a nice little timepiece

 

Cracking job! What do they charge for plating?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Opps apologies to the original poster, welcome to the forum. The best way to learn anything is to have a go at it. With this game there is plenty of good advice and instruction here and on the rest of the web, but I warn you now it can become highly addictive & more expensive than crack!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I have an update. I've obtained a crystal lift, and come next pay (two weeks!) I'll be acquiring a few more items. I'm hoping to find some very small oil vials, as I won't need them too often to start, and I'm a bit gun shy when it comes to shelling out fifty bucks or more for a bottle of oil that I won't be using too often. That said, I went with my gut, and popped the back off the watch. Now I can't get it back on by hand, although it'll sit in place and not fall off. Very odd looking...

 

I did some poking around with my 10x loupe, and found some numbering right about the balance cock.

"1700/01". From what I've seen poking around the net, my guess is it's some version of the AS 1700. Looks simple enough. Now I'll need the rest of the necessaries and some PROPER BLEEDING LIGHTING! Even if only for the experience, I'm going to disassemble it, clean it, and lubricate it. Then I'll look into repairing the case finish.

 

I get the feeling I'm going to enjoy this. Today at work, I heard the words "my watch stopped". Now I know how a cat feels when catnip is waved under its nose.

post-126-0-70935100-1395116450_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That'll be an AS1700 then, a very competent movement that came with 17 jewels all the way up to 41 jewels and possibly beyond. As I understand it AS's calibre numbering convention ends in 1 if it has a calendar. So 1700 is the base calibre without date, 1701 is a 1700 that has had a date wheel added. I have no idea where I picked that gem up from or even if it is correct so if anyone else knows different then I would be happy to stand corrected.

The silly number jewelling that some  of these movements enjoy is largely a marketing gimmick. I have an AS 1701 41 jewel variant in a Le Cheminant Master Mariner from the late 50's/early 60's. I serviced it when I first got it and of course wanted to know where all of the extra jewelling went. To my great amusement and indeed horror, 18 of them (I think it was 18) were inset into two of the auto wind intermediate wheels and served absolutely no function at all. What I have is a (very good) 23 jewel movement with a rockery on board!! I have some pics somewhere; if I can find them I will post.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As promised.

 

post-73-0-57243300-1395178487_thumb.jpg

 

18 of the 41 jewels in my Master Mariner AS1701. Set into the intermediate wheel and reverser wheel in the auto wind train.

These perform absolutely no function what so ever other than to raise the jewel count of the movement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
    • Any info on this watch would help. I know that it's sterling from London but I could not match the o letter date or make out makers mark.  Is the movement maker Camberwell or Lamberwell?   If I give it a twist it will run for about ten seconds.  $45 yard sale find.  I don't think that I want to service a fusee.  What quality is it?
×
×
  • Create New...