Jump to content

Cap jewels I am unfamiliar with.


Recommended Posts

35985188_CM220612-1327420012.thumb.jpg.efbe03d9710debcc27a9298f9107eae8.jpg

Sorry for the picture quality, I can't seem to get it to focus today.

The two triangular cap jewels:

What type are they and do I just rotate them from inside of the brass setting or am I supposed to interact with the setting, somehow, removing it from over top of the jewel?  Rotating them makes sense but I didn't want to just start shoving them around (I have no replacements).

Thanks for your time.

Shane

Edited by Shane
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be nice to have of who made the watch that would help if were trying to look up information.

Then a lot of the jewels aren't meant to come apart. Even things that have Springs a lot of time are not meant to be disassembled. So basically it means you clean them when they're assembled and your oil from the backside. Fortunately somewhere yesterday we did do a discussion on oiling from the backside which would cover the situation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I am working on is a Felsa 1560, 25 Jewel movement.  I tried gently nudging a jewel but it didn't move with what I thought was a fair amount of force.

After cleaning, I looked a bit closer and it appears that the brass ring has a triangular cutout that resricicts any rotation of the cap jewel.  It will not rotate out of position from the three retaining tabs without a vertical movement (unlikely).  The two parts snap into an annulus around the inside of the setting.  Disassembly does not look possible without damaging it irreversibly.

 

2109470135_IMG_20220612_2024192.thumb.jpg.c215fd7c9c2be1762d0b0a77cbae565d.jpg

I'm leaning towards oiling from the back.

Shane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also came across similar jewels in Accutron 218s. I was told to leave them alone and just clean them in the ultrasound. I suspect the 3 notches are not designed for any special tool to remove them but to allow cleaning fluid to circulate between the cap and hole jewel.

I oil them from the hole side.

20210609_213707.thumb.jpg.06fd7cdfa57d8a09a5f62403bfccc28f.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

I also came across similar jewels in Accutron 218s. I was told to leave them alone and just clean them in the ultrasound. I suspect the 3 notches are not designed for any special tool to remove them but to allow cleaning fluid to circulate between the cap and hole jewel.

I took a quick look at the 218 service manual as I thought it actually said that I don't see it. But I do know that they were specifically designed not to come apart. The notches are specifically for the cleaning fluid to get in. They have some other versions that have little spring is on top that look like their shock protected but the spring is only to hold the end stone in place and they Not were meant to come apart either.

This is where if a service manual existed for the watch it would probably tell us don't take this apart because. But then we end up with a lot of watches that don't have service manuals and somehow you're supposed to know what you're supposed to be doing even if you do not. Basically stuff like this represents a problem for everybody.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Shane said:

What I am working on is a Felsa 1560, 25 Jewel movement.  I tried gently nudging a jewel but it didn't move with what I thought was a fair amount of force.

After cleaning, I looked a bit closer and it appears that the brass ring has a triangular cutout that resricicts any rotation of the cap jewel.  It will not rotate out of position from the three retaining tabs without a vertical movement (unlikely).  The two parts snap into an annulus around the inside of the setting.  Disassembly does not look possible without damaging it irreversibly.

 

2109470135_IMG_20220612_2024192.thumb.jpg.c215fd7c9c2be1762d0b0a77cbae565d.jpg

I'm leaning towards oiling from the back.

Shane

Eyup Shane . Good policy to have mate don't force anything. If it looks at all risky take your caveman mentality down a few notches when he starts to kick in.  I'm fact take him out of the equation altogether, it just won't end well. Ugg doesn't have the faintest idea what you are doing or what you are dealing with. The closest he ever got to  the concept of time is when it got dark it was hit the cave floor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

I also came across similar jewels in Accutron 218s

I find the holes in the 218S HectotLooi posted interesting.  They don't appear round but multifaceted instead.  That was not free or as easy as putting in a round hole.  It had to be broached or upset into that shape.  Why did/would they do that?  This is going to be taking up some mental horsepower today or at least on the morning commute.

Thanks for the input.

Shane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/13/2022 at 6:40 AM, Shane said:

They don't appear round but multifaceted instead.

Yeah, NO.  I blew it up on the large monitor at work instead of looking at it on the small screen of my phone and it just looks like they did a poor job of deburring the holes.  There is a similar pattern around the hole to the right yet the hole does looks round.

18 hours ago, grsnovi said:

I don't think the jewels in your original photo look anything like the obviously round jewels

Yes, I believe they were just being used to prove the point that some cap jewels do not get removed upon pain of resetting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It looks like the canon pinion function is part of this great wheel. The pinion nearest the clip runs the minute wheel on the dual side. The pinion nearest the wheel is driven by a small wheel from under the setting lever cover plate that engages in hand setting position.    So when assembled the crown was driving the whole great train. Does this mean the pinions are too tight? Should I attempt to disassemble this great wheel and lubricants?
    • Picking up this side-tracked post again as I just removed a balance staff of a 1920's Omega (35,5L-T1) I was impressed by the way @Delgetti had his setup when he had to change out a balance-staff (https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/28854-new-balance-staff-not-riveting-to-balance/page/2/#comment-244054 Not only that, but also the idea of removing the seat first before punching the staff out from the seat-side, avoiding the whole discussion of the rivet yes/no enlarging the hole. I didn't have the fancy clamps & tools Delgetti has, so I used my screw-head polishing tool. Initially I used #1500 grit diamond paste on the steel wheel, which kinda worked, but very slow. I changed to #800 grit diamond paste, which worked better, but still slow. Then I glued #240 sanding paper to the steel disk; That worked and the disk was hand-driven. Once close to the balance wheel, I took the sanding paper off and continued with #800 diamond paste. One can only do this when the balance wheel sits true on the staff and has no "wobble". I went on grinding until I saw some diamond paste on the rim of the balance wheel. This was as far as I could grind and it seemed that there wasn't much left of the seat. Carefully, with my staking set, I knocked the staff from the seat-side out. Turns out that the thickness of the seat left, now a small ring, was only 0.1mm. The balance wheel hole is in perfect shape and no damage done to the wheel at all. Of course, if the wheel has a "wobble" or isn't seated true on the balance staff, you can't get as close and there will be more left of the seat. In my case, it all worked perfect 🙂 I'm very happy how this worked for me 😊  
    • As is tradition, one step forward, two steps back. Got the board populated and soldered into place without any issues.   But no hum. So I started testing the coils with an ohmmeter. I got 5.84k ohms across D1 (from red to red in the picture below), which is as expected. But I'm getting an open circuit for the other drive coil and feedback coil, D2 and F1 (from green to each of the two yellows).   Since the movement was working with my breadboard setup, it implies I somehow broke the connection between the coils and the solder lugs. They're all the way at the bottom of the lugs, but maybe the heat migrated down and broke the connections? I guess it's possible it happened while cleaning the flux off, but I used a soft artist's brush and isopropyl alcohol. I did a lot of high magnification examination, and I don't see any issues, but let me know if you see anything I missed or if you can think of anything else I should check.
    • 1947 NOS Ambassador 'C'. Actually, the case came without the movement so the movement isn't NOS, but she sure is pretty.
    • Hi attached is the AS 20XX. Service sheet although there is no 2063 mentioned it may be of some use to you AS_AS 2060,1,2,6,4,6.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...