Jump to content

A Little Fun With An Older Quartz Omega


Recommended Posts

So I found this in a junk bin and decided to fix it up a bit. It took a little work but I found the information. The watch is a quartz Seamaster Jubilee (MD 396.0969) 1432 caliber, 6 jewels, created in 1983.

17321160111_4ccaff7b1d_z.jpg

The first thing that needed to be taken care of was figuring out what model it was, and to do this, I had to remove the caseback. Problem? Well, just looking at it tells you it’s a snap back, but there was no **BLEEP**in’ place for purchase with a case knife or any other tools I have.

17321580855_26c2aa8b15_z.jpg

 

17319721152_1bc48dc010_z.jpg

 

Finally, I pulled out the superglue and a Nut. Glued the nut to the caseback, let it cure overnight, and the back popped off easily. Let the caseback/nut sit in acetone overnight and the glue completely dissolves, leaving a clean back.

16701319593_7aa4e69f69_z.jpg

 

After doing the necessary homework, I was able to source a gen stem and crown, in Poland of all places, and put in the order. Now it’s time to remove what’s left of the broken stem

17295609506_629696f95b_z.jpg

Since it was broken flush with the tube, there was no way to grip it

17114140157_d5e7ebf1aa_z.jpg

But here I was both lucky and unlucky. The stem slid out easily enough when I could access it through the case next to the movement, but that also meant there were problems with the keyless.

17319720962_b23f1406c1_z.jpg

 As you can see, there is no visible stem release, so to get to the keyless, I first had to remove the electronic components

 

17321157781_354d898c6e_z.jpg

 

And now we have the exposed keyless which will have to be disassembled to diagnose.

17114138177_d914a245c6_z.jpg

16699117614_dc34166e76_z.jpg

17134019960_b6e5f53875_z.jpg

Turns out, the keyless just needed to be reset. So, service and reassembled, it’s now time to replace the stem.

17295607196_ba995db4e9_z.jpg

Definitely too long, so I needed to cut and file it down to proper length.

17134019590_5643a37f31_z.jpg

17295607076_0e4d2509bb_z.jpg

Nice snug fit in all three positions (here it’s in position 2)

17114137427_2f9ebfb491_z.jpg

Test and reassemble electronics

17321162481_45fa83e4d8_z.jpg

Then it was just a matter of completing the service and reassemble. I’m buffing the case now to give it a nice shine, but since I kind of wanted the aged look to be kept, I’m not doing much more. Not touching the dial, but I may relume it. All in all, I enjoyed working on this. It’s a bit of history, sentimentality, and intelligent design that lends to the understanding of why Omega is what it is today.

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice... these watches are very underated.

 

Since they're not really worth much (currently) and the prices of spares are so high they will probably end up more valuable than their mechanical brethren as a lot of them get junked!

 

Anil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It might just be my cataracts playing up but I don't think that is the correct crown,  I would expect it to be very close to the case when pushed fully in.  What do others think?

You know, I thought it might be the wrong crown, but it's the crown listed on the Omega sheet. What gets me is how far out the tube is. It's actually pretty prominent on the watch, but even Omega shows it as being really prominent (http://www.omegawatches.com/planet-omega/heritage/vintage-watches-database?ref=15419).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm confused though you can see the entirety of the case pipe when its engaged, surely that's a dust proof crown intended for a tubeless case? 

Also it's gold plate! Do not polish!

Edited by Ishima
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just installed it on my iPhone (my only iOS device) and it appears to be intact and functional. I may have to go out and buy myself an ipad just for this app.
    • I have two Seitz sets, one ancient (with the 3mm anvils) and one just old (with 4mm anvils) plus a collection of spare pushers of assorted vintage. Not one of them is marked with it's size. Something which I have found very irritating when I have been using the tool and not returning pushers to their correct place in the tray every time as it means that I have to get the calipers out and measure them. These were bought as sets and collectively I have over 100 pushers so it would seem highly unlikely (if not inconceivable) that they are all cheap knock offs, especially as they are old enough to pre-date the prevalence of the Chinese knock off industry (at least as applied to watch making tools). I therefore believe them to be original Seitz parts. And there is no numbering. The shape of the bottom of the pump pushers is the same as your photo. The only thing that may not be the same is that the slotted insert (looks like a screw but is in fact a bayonet) should be brass. Yours looks the same colour as the steel but that could just be the lighting.
    • The original database is available on iOS devices here: https://apps.apple.com/fi/app/ranfft-watch-movements-archive/id6502008939
    • I no longer have my set so I can't help anymore sorry. Many on here have the set as its a must have tool for watch making/ repair.
    • It needs to be stirred before use and that makes it feel a lot thinner than when in the bottle. Does it feel as thin as 9010 after stirring it? I guess not! Yes, it's strange! I don't know, but if it is on impact it would make sense.
×
×
  • Create New...