Jump to content

Two questions RE Bulova 16AB Movement.


Fissile

Recommended Posts

Hello, everyone.  

I'm just starting in this fascinating hobby.  I rate my skills as a half-step above noob.  I recently purchased a broken Bulova 16AB movement on eBay for $26 utilizing my expert sniper skills...my apologies to any of you gals/guys whom may have been bidding on this hunk-o-junk.    The 16AB appears to be a standard Unitas 6497 but I have not seen the Unitas mark in the usual place (only partly disassembled at this point).   Like I said, it seems to be a 6497 but it does have on notable difference, instead of the usual Incabloc found on these movements this has got a Kif.   

These are my two questions: 

1) When I removed the dial, I found two dial washers installed in reverse orientation.   I've never encountered this before.  Is this how some watches came from the factory, or does anyone think this may have been some half-a**ed repair attempt? 

2) When I removed the hands the cannon pinion popped off as well.  Hmmm.   I'm guessing I will be ordering a new cannon pinion and/or center wheel.   I checked with the usual suspects, and they offer 3 different cannon pinion heights for the 6497/8.   I'm really not sure how to measure the cannon pinion height.   Do I measure the overall height of the cannon pinion, or just the shaft (no dirty pun intended)?  Having worked on cars since I was 14 years of age, I'm not a fan of 'repairing' broken stuff by firing the parts 'cannon' at it (pun intended).  

Anyway, if I can get this bowel-movement running, my plan is to install it in a Panerai-esque case I purchased on Ali Express for $32 Murican (delivered).   Any info you folks can provide will be greatly appreciated.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, JohnC said:

Cannon pinion can be tightened using a staking tool or cannon pinion tightener. Described in Fried's Watch Repairer's Manual, a great reference book to have around.

Thanks for your answer.  Yes, I know the cannon pinion can be tightened.   Unfortunately, that doesn't answer my question regarding how to properly measure the height of the cannon pinion.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi  The unitas 6497  brings up the ETA6497 and as no tech seems to be available for the Unitas/UT and everything equates to the ETA movement .   from the drawings (attached) there are three heights measured from top to bottom of,     2.65        3.00     3.15           so in answer to your question it would look like you measure the total height of the canon pinion         Hope all this is some use to you        cheers                        Unitas 6497-1, 6498-1 (1).pdf

Unitas 6497-2, 6498-2 (2).pdf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Fissile said:

I'm guessing I will be ordering a new cannon pinion and/or center wheel.   I checked with the usual suspects, and they offer 3 different cannon pinion heights for the 6497/8

You can service and get the watch running before ordering these parts, you might need others.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Plato said:

You can service and get the watch running before ordering these parts, you might need others.

That's a good idea.  Now that I look at this thing a bit closer it's clear there are some differences between this and the ETA 6497-1 even though it measures the same diameter as the ETA @ 36.6mm

The first picture is from the bridge side.   It appears to be a bog standard 6497, the obvious exceptions are the shock system (this uses Kif and ETA uses Incabloc) and the fact that this uses a pallet cock instead of the ETA's pallet bridge. 

Second picture is from the dial side.  That keyless works is definitely not like the ETA.  The setting spring and setting lever are very different.  The setting wheel layout is also different.  The slot on the setting lever screw is totally buggered and the stem is broken off in the movement.  

What have I got myself into?

20211111_165529_005.jpg

16ABDIALWASHER_01.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I did some research and found out that the movement I purchased is NOT a Unitas 6497, it is a Unitas 497, which is an older version.   This particular movement was made in 1965.   Now I need to take it apart completely and find out why it doesn't run. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Fissile said:

Bulova 16AB movement on eBay

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=BUL_16AB

4 hours ago, Fissile said:

Well, I did some research and found out that the movement I purchased is NOT a Unitas 6497, it is a Unitas 497, which is an older version.

Looks like your research be doing better than the material house did? Found your movement above parts list including the Canon pinion height. Normally if you click on a part it give you everything Including a cross references to, and they don't seem to think cross to anything?

Although it Does look a lot like the 497 in the picture below except the balance wheel jewels?

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&Unitas_497

Then I did find You a parts list.

Bulova_Bulova 16AB.pdf

Edited by JohnR725
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Fissile said:

Now I need to take it apart completely and find out why it doesn't run. 

Looking at your pictures again one of things that bothers me is look where the stud holder is? Typically get find the regulator in that position and the stud holder should be moved back considerably. But in need to look at whether the watch visually is in beat and put that where it's supposed to be it may be somebody is bumped that it may be grossly out of beat or it may just be fine. The understand what I mean by this look at the link for the 694 I have above and you'll notice that the stud is in a different location

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going back to your original question about the two dial washers, I wouldn't be concerned. It is a valid method of increasing the distance over which a disc spring acts, without increasing the rate, or taking up play in other words. The orientation is the key. The other way round you get the same deflection as a single spring, but double the rate.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Looking at your pictures again one of things that bothers me is look where the stud holder is? Typically get find the regulator in that position and the stud holder should be moved back considerably. But in need to look at whether the watch visually is in beat and put that where it's supposed to be it may be somebody is bumped that it may be grossly out of beat or it may just be fine. The understand what I mean by this look at the link for the 694 I have above and you'll notice that the stud is in a different location

You win one internet!

I was so preoccupied  chasing broken or jammed up parts that I totally overlooked the obvious.   I set the beat where it should be...more or less..and it started running!   Put on the timegrapher and the little SOB has 260 degrees of amplitude!  That's in it's current crusty condition.   Let's see what it does after a wash and lube. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

I still don't get the part about the cannon pinion. Did it break into two? Did the tube come off the wheel?

If not, just tighten it pop it back on.

The stem is broken off in the movement and the setting lever screw is totally buggered.  I have to order those parts at a minimum, may as well just order a new cannon pinion and be done with it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi All, Just wanted to say thanks to everyone who has contributed a reply to my original question. I’ve learnt a lot and I’m much clearer about the options for replacing the mainspring in my project.   It’s been a very fruitful discussion. Cheers, John
    • Hello WRT members I started a project 4years ago printing straps for seiko model 5M42-0E69. This because the strap wasn’t produced anymore and i needed a strap for my father’s watch that come to my possession. I found someone who was willing to make a computer drawing and than he started printing and worked out well. To build up the metal caps you need to have some patience but it worked.  He fiets printed a prototype in red.  With some adjustments such as the heath off the printer he started to print them in the original color black.  Sorry these are original SLQ003 straps!!!
    • Hello a nd welcome ro the forum.      Enjoy.
    • I went with GBP as you guys started it off and $4.04 adjusted for inflation.
    • Great help for me - thank you all. If the hairspring has been shortened, it must have have even tighter coils than it does now and they all look utterly concentric but nevertheless I'm not leaning further towards that explanation. For me, vibrating a new hairspring would be far from easy - I wouldn't know where to start.And if a new contrate wheel has been cut and mounted, it's been done very skilfully, leaving no obvious telltale signs. Cutting and crossing out contrate wheels takes skill, too, so a bit of a last resort. and why would the he have cut 70 teeth if the existing one had 75. The platform certainly looks original to the clock but I cannot rule out the possibility that it has been taken from a similar period one (with a different tooth count). It was produced by Soldano (who supplied Dent) and the movement is by Hollingue Freres (who worked for Drocourt) so it's a nice small one (not a miniature) but I have to say that it does look like it has been worked on by someone with a hammer and centre punch instead of a bushing tool. The history isn't know - the current owner has never seen it working. I completely dismantled it again at the weekend to make the tooth count but when I've figured it out, I'll take some photos. But for now, I think I've reached the end of the line.
×
×
  • Create New...