Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Never had to fix pendant tubes before, but I've got a Sekonda/Poljot 2612 with a loose tube.

The diameter measures 1.92 mm, which seems an odd size - it's not really loose, just not tight enough, it pulls out with the crown.

Is there a method to secure them (Threadlock?) or do I need a new pendant? If so what size?

The outer part diameter is 2.15 mm. I guess that gives a waterproof fit in a 2mm crown?

pendant.thumb.jpg.2e202d2e471d275687654e4f735e0351.jpg  

Posted

I'm also in the process of restoring a 2612. It's a Poljot alarm watch. The seller claimed that it has been serviced by a watchmaker and is in good working condition. 

That was far from the truth. The movement was absolutely filthy. The case gasket was a strip of rubber, coiled around the rim. The crystal is not original as file marks on the edges are visible. One pendant tube was missing and the other is a crumpled brass tube. One dial foot was broken off and the ratchet wheel was warped. There are only 3 good things about this watch, which are the mainspring and alarm spring appers to be new and the price of the watch.

I thought only sellers from south Asia were capable of this but was I mistaken.

Posted (edited)

The watch I bought was being sold for parts. The case/dial/hands are OK but the movement is the oiliest/dirtiest I've come across. There's what look likes a blob of black tar sticking the hairspring together. And there's no escape wheel.

It's so dirty and oily, I'm going to give the whole movement a few minutes in the ultrasonic before I strip it.

The good news is that parts are easy to find and cheap (which I checked before buying) - On Cousins almost all parts are £5.95+VAT

 

_ebay2.thumb.jpg.6cc4ee70e7992c9e97209725ed29e169.jpg_ebay3.thumb.jpg.64c671a73dff9a3f74b73cd8b22ae330.jpg

Edited by mikepilk
Posted
On 10/22/2021 at 4:24 PM, mikepilk said:

Never had to fix pendant tubes before, but I've got a Sekonda/Poljot 2612 with a loose tube.

The diameter measures 1.92 mm, which seems an odd size - it's not really loose, just not tight enough, it pulls out with the crown.

Is there a method to secure them (Threadlock?) or do I need a new pendant? If so what size?

The outer part diameter is 2.15 mm. I guess that gives a waterproof fit in a 2mm crown?

pendant.thumb.jpg.2e202d2e471d275687654e4f735e0351.jpg  

I have had this a few times. In the past I used a wee bit of "shoe goo" to act as a seal, and then used the point of a SS conical shaped nail to expand the tube back out when it is back where it should be. I have used a vice and or plyers to push the nail in to the tube to expand it. If the tube sticks out in to the watch, I don't recommend this as it will probably split the tube. I'm not a fan of threadlock etc because it is designed to break under pressure so you can still remove the bolts if necessary. I have had also had some good success with superglue but you have to be quick and do not use gell as it seems to set quicker. You have about 4 seconds to make sure it is in the correct place. As Nicklesilver said, give it a good clean with solvent first.

Posted

Loctite would be my method. Just clean the tube and case with a degreaser such as mentholated sprit before applying the loctite. 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Deomandinka said:

I have had this a few times. In the past I used a wee bit of "shoe goo" to act as a seal, and then used the point of a SS conical shaped nail to expand the tube back out when it is back where it should be. I have used a vice and or plyers to push the nail in to the tube to expand it. If the tube sticks out in to the watch, I don't recommend this as it will probably split the tube. I'm not a fan of threadlock etc because it is designed to break under pressure so you can still remove the bolts if necessary. I have had also had some good success with superglue but you have to be quick and do not use gell as it seems to set quicker. You have about 4 seconds to make sure it is in the correct place. As Nicklesilver said, give it a good clean with solvent first.

What is "shoe goo"?

I've ordered some Loctite 648 - designed to be more permanent than normal thread lock. AS @nickelsilver says : "It's specifically for locking cylindrical fits, basically permanent unless significant heat is applied". 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 10/24/2021 at 2:13 PM, mikepilk said:

What is "shoe goo"?

I've ordered some Loctite 648 - designed to be more permanent than normal thread lock. AS @nickelsilver says : "It's specifically for locking cylindrical fits, basically permanent unless significant heat is applied". 

 

No Worries, I like to make sure my stuff is 100% waterproof. Shoe Goo is a semi liquid rubber used for, ironically, repairing shoes. 🙂 Good luck

Posted
30 minutes ago, Jack75 said:

Was there a typo?  Loctite 638  is the gap sealant.

Loctite 638.pdf 80.91 kB · 1 download

648 is lower viscosity and for smaller gap filling; on something like a tube that has slight but insufficient friction it has a better performance than 638. For larger looser fits, or where a portion of the part can be recessed to provide room for the product 638 is a better choice.

  • Like 1
Posted

If the tube is particularly loose then I sometimes tap a punch or broach into it to spread it open very slightly. And also apply loctite.

Posted
7 hours ago, rodabod said:

If the tube is particularly loose then I sometimes tap a punch or broach into it to spread it open very slightly. And also apply loctite.

I asked the original question as I didn't know if they are just friction fit, or is it common to use Loctite. I used the Loctite 648, which seems to have done the job. I can also see that the other tube was glued in.

Posted

In terms of threadlock or not: the BHI say that stem threads should now Abe threadlocked, so I’m guessing the same would apply to pendant tubes. They now advocate using it for fixing clock wheel collets too. 

Posted

I try to always make sure stems, tubes, repivots etc. are a good mechanical fit. But I will often use a bit of appropriate Loctite as a belt and suspenders. Especially for tubes that should be press fit, but sometimes the hole has a terrible surface finish or the fit is iffy, loctite helps make sure its waterproof and not going to work out. And it can be hard to judge the fit- it might seem like it will be a good fit, but is a little loose, but the stainless on stainless wants to gall when removing...- and the Loctite actually eases the assembly a bit even if it's actually a tight fit!

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Regarding the spring winders, I made my own and used copper pipe reducers as the tubes to retain the spring. You will need to cut out a section for the end of the spring to protrude but if you watch one of the many videos on this subject that will make sense. You can find a selection of sizes on Ebay for very little cost. I'll attach a pic showing one of mine.  Good luck!
    • There were things bothering me about this discussion that took me a while to figure out the problem. In the image below it appears to be the spring may be pushing up? Normally when Omega has a spring pushing up the pinion has a pivot with a bridge to hold it in place so in other words the spring can push on something that stationary as opposed to this which appears to be floating? To understand the problem with the above image we need another image of side view which I have below. In my image down below on the left-hand side it agrees with the image up above. But the only problem is the left-hand side is defective and the right-hand side image is the way it's supposed to look. Then Omega if you can access the right documents does explain how and why this problem occurs. With the pinion floating around it might be assumed that you support it when putting on all the hands but you do not because as noted below if you do this small bush on the pinion will relocate out of position exactly what we see in the image up above.   Then Omega does not mention this but there is a possibility of also damaging the pinion and causing the bush to move to where it's not supposed to be when removing the hands.   
    • Maybe show us 1) the watch, 2) timegrapher readings in DU, DD, PU, and PD.
    • The timegrapher displays significant beat error variations in the dial-up position. When the watch is lying flat (face up), the beat error is much higher than in other positions. Beat error readings are inconsistent, with especially large gaps in the face-up position.  Please help !  
    • Looks like an open-access journal that runs as a glorified pre-print server with no true peer review, so it’s not easy to judge the veracity of the conclusions.
×
×
  • Create New...