Jump to content

Magnetized Balance


icius

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

 

I was working on an ST 1686 and got down to the point of analyzing the balance/hairspring.  I determined that the hairspring was magnetized as the coils were sticking together when prompted (i.e. slight pressure on the outside of the hairspring).  This had already been through a full cycle of the cleaning machine as well as an additional dip in naptha so I'm pretty confident that it is not some kind of contamination.  

 

I picked up this item last week from Esslinger:

 

post-752-0-80282100-1427639683_thumb.jpg

 

I had the balance removed from the balance cock so I thought it would be a great first test for my new demagnetizer. 

 

I followed Mark's procedure in 

 

https://youtu.be/E6_KOcc4eD4

 

Started with the balance almost touching the demagnetizer,  pushed the button, and slowly pulled it away from the demagnetizer at about 45 degrees.  What I expected to happen was the coils to pop apart as the magnetism was removed.  

 

Nope.

 

Much googling and 20 different techniques later I still have a magnetized hairspring.  Is it possible I have a defective demagnitizer?  I see the hairspring jump when I push the button so it is definitely doing something.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple of things.

1) Keep the balance in the movement when you use the demagnetiser to lessen the chance of the hairspring getting tangled during the process.

2) It's not unusual to have to repeat this a couple of times to get the result you want. It is possible to inadvertently magnetise using this tool. This has happened with me a few times, but if you repeat the process it will work.

3) Is it definitely magnetism, or could there be oil on the hairspring?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More than likely the coils are contaminated with the cleaning/rinse fluid.

The only product I have found that works to clean hairsprings is actual hairspring cleaner, everything else I have ever tried and used leaves a residue and the coils stick.

Dead right. Had problems like this in the past, so always keep a jar of Essence of Renata (or similar) exclusively for the final hairspring dip. Funnily enough I have just reassembled a Seiko 6619 today, hairspring clean as a whistle, coils not sticking etc. timegrapher all over the place. A quick blast on the demagnetiser and all is fine. If its not one thing its the other.

 

Is it worth demagnatising every mechanical watch as a matter of course?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't normally demagnitize all movements that I service. Modern movements with modern hairsprings are not magnetic, so there is no reason to try and demagnitize them. Certainly older movements with blued steel hairsprings can get magnitized, but as stated above simply demagnitizing for the sake of demagnitizing everything can be a problem. In some cases I have had a real problem getting small parts to demagnitize, even after repeated attempts, so I only demagnitize when I know it's already magnetic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the moment I have a small Etic model. Bought it because the price for other models was completely unrealistic, 685 Pounds is nuts. The Etic does a decent job and does work, but I sometimes wonder if the low cost means that it's not really up to the task, I do have to repeat the operation now and then.

I had a really nice demagnitizer before I left Canada, but it was of course 110V and no good here. It was old but made for the Magnaflux Non Destructive Testing industry, and was excellent. I would love to find another one for 220V, the search continues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mentioned it in my above post 'cause I've experienced it myself.

Ooops! apologies Geo, missed your post. I really must pay attention in class (I think they used to say that too me a school a lot, but I wasn't really paying attention at the time).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yes the things we read in the universe I did see some where it was either difficult to clean off or it contaminated the cleaning fluid there was some issue with cleaning. I was trying to remember something about grease where as opposed to a substance of a specific consistency they were suggesting it had a base oil with something to thicken it. That conceivably could indicate that the two could separate and that would be an issue. But there is something else going on here that I had remembered so I have a link below and the description of the 9501 notice the word that I highlighted? Notice that word appears quite a bit on this particular page like 9415 has that property all so they 8200 mainspring grease and that definitely has to be mixed up when you go to use it because it definitely separates. just in case you didn't remember that nifty word there is a Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thixotropy   https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases I wonder if what you're seeing is the boron nitride left behind after cleaning. In other words it's the high-pressure part of the grease and it's probably embedding itself into the metal which is why it doesn't clean off and shouldn't be a problem?
    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
    • Hi not found one either yet,  close relative is the 436 and 4361 according to ranff.db.   It gives quire a lot of detail but not as good as the old site.      RANFF.DB.
    • No problem to replace the setting with the staking set. Press the new setting from inside, use flat face punch with hole. The punch must be wider than the setting, the hole to be as not to press at the stone, but only on the bush. Press by hand until the setting gets flush with the plate surface, so the punch must rest on it.
    • Yes, the arbor usually makes about 3 to 3.5 turns. But usually spring takes 2/3 to 3/4 of the free space in barrel, not 1/2, so take it for the calcullations. This way the change in torque is smaller. I have a picture for You, this one is little older, but no mater
×
×
  • Create New...