Jump to content

Quartz movement run slow


Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

@rodabod  Aprox 2 minutes/ hr slow.

 

I'd watch the seconds hand for a few minutes and see if you observe it ever stuttering.

Of course, the easy option is if you have a quartz measurement tool, but most of us don't own one.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is always the possibility of a faulty Block  but they either work or dont work,  Unless you have an analyser or some method of testing the module ie current consumption its difficult, High consumption is usually a dirty mech drawing more current to over come the dirt.

2 min per day is indicative of a sluggish train,  Whats the calibre number

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you watchweasol, I am not yet sure if I should crack the back open. must have a quartz eta inside. Will ask you for datasheet if it gets to clean and lube. 

The watch is a friend's who didn't know, I am quartz ignorant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Nucejoe  A quartz watch is no different than a mechanical one  apart from the fact the Battery provides the voltage/current the block interprets this, The crystal vibrates around 32,768 times a second the block divides this down to normaly one pulse a second which is output to the coil which causes the step motor to pulse once, this turns the gear train and then the hands.  Some watches pulse once every 4 secs  or 6 secs depending on the make.  As the current drawn is in micro amps it doesnt take much to affect the module ie dirt and old oil or even the wrong oil should be  9024 and 9027.  The attachment explains both the mechanical and the quartz.      regards

Witschi Training Course.pdf

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Hi Nucejoe  A quartz watch is no different than a mechanical one  apart from the fact the Battery provides the voltage/current the block interprets this, The crystal vibrates around 32,768 times a second the block divides this down to normaly one pulse a second which is output to the coil which causes the step motor to pulse once, this turns the gear train and then the hands.  Some watches pulse once every 4 secs  or 6 secs depending on the make.  As the current drawn is in micro amps it doesnt take much to affect the module ie dirt and old oil or even the wrong oil should be  9024 and 9027.  The attachment explains both the mechanical and the quartz.      regards

Witschi Training Course.pdf 4.65 MB · 0 downloads

Thank you WW,  the minute hand completes each forward move by one second on dial markings with each pulse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Thank you WW,  the minute hand completes each forward move by one second on dial markings with each pulse. 

But, it's dropping seconds somewhere.... When I say "stuttering", what I basically mean is, is the motion irregular in any way?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi    when the block is calculating the pulses it uses a thing called inhibition and if the checksum is not right it either adds or drops a pulse to automaticaly correct the calculated error ,  so there is the remote possibility the block circuit is faulty in its calculations. But these circuits either work or dont work they are that reliable but one should not discount the possibility.  If it were me I would clean and oil the movement and re run any tests using the analyser, Not having an analyser use a analogue meter and watch the coil pulses for a regular beat or just run the watch and observe the timing.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Update: I posted over on NAWCC and it looks like I melted the fine coil wires where they come into the solder lugs. After dropping the heat way down on my iron and being absurdly careful, I have a humming fork!
    • Hell0 @nevenbekriev. Thank you for your advice. I have removed the old setting using my staking set--I will keep the KIF spring, since it is still good.  I am awaiting the replacement setting, and will update when I do that. In the mean time, I looked at the escape wheel and it looks ok. What do you think?    
    • Aloha All, I recently bought this Seitz tool on eBay, but it is missing some pushers reamers.  I ended up ordering new parts for those that were missing before I received the actual Seitz tool (bad idea).   Upon inspecting the pushers/bits, I noticed 23 of the 56 provided with the set had no numbers. Further inspection revealed a huge difference in the quality of those unnumbered.  Do all Seitz pushers/bits have a number on them?  I'm pretty sure that 33 of the 56 I received are cheap Chinese knockoffs.  The worst part is that I ordered $80 of parts to replace the missing pushers/bits, and now I'm looking to return the tool. I'm not crazy, right? If these are Seitz parts, they should all be numbered, correct? The first two pictures are the Seitz (numbered), and the other pictures are the suspect parts.  Will I even be able to get a refund?  Thanks, Frank     
    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
×
×
  • Create New...