Jump to content

How do I remove and replace these "tuning fork shaped" cap jewel springs?


VWatchie

Recommended Posts

image.png.3d807fd6693c1dc0098edd8ec090f985.png

Years ago, back in 2014, I bought this Orient Union (Model no. EV0S004B) housing an Orient calibre 46E40, automatic, non-hacking and non-winding. I think I got for less than $100. I was going to travel around in south east Asia for over a month and I didn’t want to lose too much money should I get rob. Well, I never got rob and it served me well. Anyway, I felt it was time to give it an overhaul.

This is my very first Japanese movement service, and so far, I must say it differs quite a bit from the Russian and Swiss movements that I’ve serviced before. It’s interesting to see how the Japanese have found their own ways to build movements; for example, the automatic works. I wonder what lurks as I get deeper into the movement. It’s pretty exciting, even though it’s a low budget Japanese movement.

image.png.7788343c480526939033c035109511b3.png

Anyway, I wonder if anyone of you have experience of this type of "tuning fork shaped" cap jewel spring? It looks as if it’s designed to fly to the moon if only just touched. So, I feel pretty nervous to continue the tear down without some advice. Please share your experience or your guesses about how to handle these springs! There are two of them.

Edited by VWatchie
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The trick is not to remove them at all....

They are a version of Seiko's "Diafix" springs and they are designed to allow the jewel to be removed without removing the spring.

What you have to do is to gently push the middle leg in towards the centre of the jewel until the tab clears the recess, then hinge it up with the two prongs still in the recess so that you can remove the cap jewel.

There have been posts on here about these before, I'll see if I can find one with pictures.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Marc said:

The trick is not to remove them at all....

They are a version of Seiko's "Diafix" springs and they are designed to allow the jewel to be removed without removing the spring.

What you have to do is to gently push the middle leg in towards the centre of the jewel until the tab clears the recess, then hinge it up with the two prongs still in the recess so that you can remove the cap jewel.

There have been posts on here about these before, I'll see if I can find one with pictures.

Thank you very much @Marc and If you can find those posts I'd really appreciate it. I understand your description of the procedure perfectly but it seems like a very, very delicate process so any additional info or illustrations would be welcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Marc said:

Lots of info here about Seiko Diafix.

Also a pic speaks a thousand words....

diafix-settings.jpg.9e7912e73d36ae7b309c798315fb54af.jpg

This not my own but stolen from here

If you haven't come acros Martins' blog before then you're in for a treat if you like seiko.

Wow, wonderful, thanks again! As I said, this is my very first Japanese movement, but I'm guessing there will be more in the future considering the restrictions placed on Swiss parts. It would be very interesting to service a Miyota 9015 which I've heard is a Japanese ETA 2824-2, but surely very different in design I would guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, VWatchie said:

 It would be very interesting to service a Miyota 9015 which I've heard is a Japanese ETA 2824-2, but surely very different in design I would guess.

More like a 2982 considering its thinness. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here Adrian from VTA shows how to deal with diafix, same as the above tutorial from Mike, but Adrian is also showing how to reinstall the spring in case it pops off.

 

Edited by aac58
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMG_3501.JPG.c0750b74251c53a57c965209037f1523.JPG

IMG_3510.JPG.66f90074ad4de1542f56b63db4b15db3.JPG

IMG_3511.JPG.7aefc6a241c677b0d44b9976408cab45.JPG

IMG_3512.JPG.951508651ec24aca823d96c200cdb259.JPG

IMG_3513.JPG.a7168fceb30c90bcd758c715f5d5bfd1.JPG

IMG_3514.JPG.abb675238a519366c075a9893cfd57f7.JPG

IMG_3515.JPG.1315624e96442ef9e7a0d0c58a9cb4be.JPG

IMG_3517.JPG.6bb6495b06ccee6bdff482f3be52a837.JPG

Success! Thank you very much guys! Without your info I’m not sure at all that I would have prevailed :thumbsu:

I guess my pictures doesn’t add anything new, but at least they are nice to look at, I hope.

These Diafix springs were not designed for beginners. Dexterity-wise I imagine this is on the level of brain surgery and I’m not sure the outcome would have been as successful as it was had it not been for my stereo microscope, Rodico, good tweezers, patience and awareness of breathing and bodily tenseness (when I was young I competed in air rifle shooting). Another skill that I have acquired over the years is the understanding of how important it is to gradually increase and gradually decrease the energy transferred into tools (tweezers, screwdrivers, etc.). All this experience came very handy today. And again, thanks for your help!

Unfortunately, I will now have to pause the tear down for a few weeks, but eventually I’ll try report back of any findings I might make a about these Diafix springs.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are going to research further you will sooner or later come across Kif's Duofix system, which looks similar, opens and closes the same, and is just as fiddly. They come in different sizes too. I have no idea if the springs are interchangeable, but I doubt it.KIF-ID Tabelle.pdf

Edited by Klassiker
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I read somewhere that old watchmakers trick was to make a fork tool out of a sewing needle. So I made my own and working with diafix has never been easier. I don't even need rodico to keep the spring in place, you have such a good control with the tool. When replacing the cap jewel and finally closing the spring I use tweezers to press the little tab in. So the tool is a sewing needle glued to a peg wood. Eye has been cut and filed/polished to final shape. I initially made one with longer prongs that were bent more but it was prone to breaking and you have better control with shorter prongs anyway.

IMG_20220126_004709.jpg

IMG_20220126_004341.jpg

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
    • Maybe I'm over simplifying this and I'm a little late to the discussion, but just by my looking at oil when I use it on a treated cap jewel  the oil stays in one nice bubble, but when I don't it spreads out to the edges of the jewel. I'm not sure (but could well be wrong) but the analogy of a waxed car and rain is accurate in this case, the wax is very hydrophobic and repels the water, however, the process epilame works by is a different physical process based upon cohesion/adhesion (oleophilic) not repulsion (oleophobic)  at least as far as I have read/observed. If one were to use a oleophobic substance equivalent to wax (hydrophobic) then one would need to create a donut shape to fence in the oil, however if one used such a strategy with a epilame which is oleophilic then the oil would sit on the ring of the donut and not in the 'donut hole', exactly where you don't want it. Even if the oil is smeared then the oleophilic epilame should pull it back to the center (see diagram below). Reference For interest the chemical in epilame is 2-(PERFLUOROHEXYL) ETHYL METHACRYLATE, CAS NO: 2144-53-8
    • Looks lint the teeth on the hour wheel aren't meshing with the teeth on the calendar intermediate wheel, maybe the hour wheel is sitting on top of this instead of meshing?        
×
×
  • Create New...