Jump to content

Real or fake?


Recommended Posts

Hey was just looking at some watches online and just stumbled across this 'Rolex' and 'omega' I thought they looked a bit fake but wasn't sure about how genuine they were. The omega had some sort of tag but I couldn't identify  it however looked fairly decent

The listing said that it was there uncles and that they didnt know anything about them and when contacted repeated this and wouldn't take any more or higher quality pics

(Sorry for the low quality images they aren't mine)

Screenshot_20200131-223619_eBay.jpg

Screenshot_20200131-223630_eBay.jpg

Screenshot_20200131-223638_eBay.jpg

Screenshot_20200131-223654_eBay.jpg

Screenshot_20200131-223703_eBay.jpg

Screenshot_20200131-223714_eBay.jpg

Screenshot_20200131-224506_eBay.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Dylan123 said:

The listing said that it was there uncles and that they didnt know anything about them and when contacted repeated this and wouldn't take any more or higher quality pics

Which says it all. In my opinion:

  • Learn on, or repair "for human cause" a fake watch which was passed to you: No problem.
  • Document how poorly or good they are made: Useful and interesting to read.
  • Defend counterfeiting with some convoluted reasoning, or wear them: Just opinions, or matter of (poor) taste.
  • Go out and willingly buy a fake watch: Hmmmm. Not to mention that is better not to let grow an illusion that it may be genuine after all. Buy an honest and modest watch with the same money - actually is not little money sometime.
  • Deceive a buyer as claiming or otherwise acting as if it's genuine: Crime of fraud.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me think..

Scenario one  "uncle" had a genuine Omega, AND a genuine Rolex, and treated them like junk.

Scenario two  "uncle" had a fake Omega, AND a fake Rolex, and treated them like junk.

If I owned them, and they were genuine,  I'd keep them in the best of order, in their original boxes (*).

As it happens I have a similar "Faux-mega" in my junk box.

 

 

* Actually I'd probably flog them, original boxes included, and buy something else that I would enjoy even more... but you get my point.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dylan123 said:

 

Didnt have a starting price, just thought it was interesting seeing as someone bidded £150 straight away meaning they thought this collection had some worth. 

Can be a baiting bid, or

"a fool and his money are soon parted" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi I think jdm is very close.   I read an article where some dealers have a pal and when they put up articles for sale the pal puts in a bid(baiting bid) which attacts others but if its a (sale)  It does not reach the price required it pulled and no goods change hands and the article is again punted at a later date. One has to be carefull.  jdm's quote is a word to the wise.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, AndyHull said:

Let me think..

Scenario one  "uncle" had a genuine Omega, AND a genuine Rolex, and treated them like junk.

Scenario two  "uncle" had a fake Omega, AND a fake Rolex, and treated them like junk.

If I owned them, and they were genuine,  I'd keep them in the best of order, in their original boxes (*).

As it happens I have a similar "Faux-mega" in my junk box.

 

 

* Actually I'd probably flog them, original boxes included, and buy something else that I would enjoy even more... but you get my point.

Yh agree with you there the Rolex looked kinda dodgy but omega looked pretty interesting also noted that rotary Guarantee that looked wierd because if someone was buying legit rotaries then you would think they wouldnt be in the mindset of fakes but whatever I guess. Also possible (but unlikely) that the box was somewhere else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Rolex is definitely fake. The Omega I couldn't swear to it but I'd bet you it was.

As per AndyHull, no one, literally no one treats a luxury watch like those, i.e. thrown in a drawer rattling around getting scratched.

EVERYONE the seller included has heard of (at least the first one) Rolex and Omega and if they honestly thought they were genuine would have had them checked.

I don't even know if they make a two Tone yachtmaster but if so. That's several thousand in that one alone if it were genuine. Which it most assuredly isn't. (That sticker for one thing alone)

There'll always be someone willing to chance bidding to stumble across that mythical genuine old watch of uncle Fred's that's worth a fortune, but every instance I've ever heard of has been second third fourth or fifth hand and almost certainly allegorical.

The fact they won't take more pics tells you all you need to know anyway.

That pocket watch might be interesting though. But I certainly wouldn't be bidding much over £20 per piece maximum on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, m1ks said:

The Rolex is definitely fake. The Omega I couldn't swear to it but I'd bet you it was.

As per AndyHull, no one, literally no one treats a luxury watch like those, i.e. thrown in a drawer rattling around getting scratched.

EVERYONE the seller included has heard of (at least the first one) Rolex and Omega and if they honestly thought they were genuine would have had them checked.

I don't even know if they make a two Tone yachtmaster but if so. That's several thousand in that one alone if it were genuine. Which it most assuredly isn't. (That sticker for one thing alone)

There'll always be someone willing to chance bidding to stumble across that mythical genuine old watch of uncle Fred's that's worth a fortune, but every instance I've ever heard of has been second third fourth or fifth hand and almost certainly allegorical.

The fact they won't take more pics tells you all you need to know anyway.

That pocket watch might be interesting though. But I certainly wouldn't be bidding much over £20 per piece maximum on that.

Thanks agree with you there. Just think it's strange how people shroud watches in mystery and that they know 'absolutely nothing about anything' in general as well if I was selling anything in fact a few google searches would tell you for 99% of things what they were and whether they are genuine. Just a different thought process I guess. Most people would probably get excited when they see a rolex not just stick it on some ebay auction.

Saying that I do like bidding on these type of things providing that the surrounding things can make up the value. Like a lottery really in a million chance of a win but worth it for the excitement. Theres a time and place for vintage Rolex's and its definitely not shoddy ebay auctions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we use the rub-off epilame method of pallet stones (run dry for a few minutes before applying the epilame) where will the oil go/be transported when it is pushed away from the impulse surface by the escape wheel teeth? Onto the epilame-treated sections of the pallet! Once the oil has been applied/transported to the epilame-treated sections of the pallet where will it then go? Nowhere as the oil will remain on the epilame. So, perhaps the run-dry method defeats its intended purpose leaving the pallet impulse surfaces dry!? If, on the other hand, we do not remove the epilame from the pallet stones where the escape wheel teeth come in contact with them I'd expect more oil to remain where we want it and need it. Yes, I agree, that is the question, and my gut feeling tells me that is exactly the case. Epilame was created to have an adhesive trait and the oleophobic property is just a side effect.  
    • Might that be the viscous nature of oil resisting gravity H  ,  we have been comparing water and hydrophobic surfaces which are similar in principle but water is much less viscous than oil. I guess what we trying to discover is if epilame also has an adhesive trait as well as being oleophobic. Plus the oil dropet has very little mass for gravity to work on, like watching tiny water beads that can grip onto vertical glass until they are connected together to increase their mass then run down. Gravity isn't the only factor at play when oil is placed on pallet stones. The oil receives a lot of bashing that may push it out of position ? Thinking about it if the oil stays in position for 10 minutes enough time for the escape wheel to scrape off the epilame , then  a walled in lubrication has been achieved,  the epilame is no longer beneath the oil ( possibly mixed into the oil )
    • But it also makes it seem less susceptible to gravity. If you place a droplet of oil on an epilame-treated surface the droplet of oil will still stay in place even if you then flip the surface from a horizontal to a vertical position. That is, the oil droplet remains anchored, and that's the purpose of epilame. If it was just a matter of creating an oleophobic surface we could probably use other, less expensive, methods!? I don't know @Waggy but my gut feeling tells me you're spot on (pun intended!). I believe the oleophobic property is a side effect of epilame which is designed to keep the oil anchored.
    • Saturday morning 27/4 Sunday evening 28/4 Monday evening 29/4 Floor has a drain in the middle so I am hoping that there is very little fall on it, if any. Room is about 2.5 x 2.5 metres square. Can only use about 1/2 of one wall on the right of the pictures which has a sliding glass door in it. And only about 3/4 of the wall to the left of the pictures as it has the door to the house in it. Progress. 🙂 
    • This makes much more sense now, the oil is withdrawing itself to make as little contact with the epilame as possible. Same principle as wax on a car creates a hyrophobic surface that makes the cohesive properties of water molecules pull together.  The water beads run off only when under the influence of gravity but still remain cohesively beaded up. And as mentioned earlier a pivot would keep the oil in place on a cap jewel.  Epilame on an escapement would be a different scenario, there is nothing to hold the oil in position if gravity tugs at the bead to move, plus the escape teeth pull the oil about Maybe this is why its suggested to run the watch for a short while to remove the epilame to make two oleophobic surfaces either side of the oil, creating a ring of fire 🔥 around it 😅 The oil is repelled by every surface of the epilame even that which it sits upon. So the oil pulls together to make as little contact with it as possible, but the oil cant float above that area, it can only sit there on top of it. Under gravity the oil could potentially run away as an oil bead, unless the epilame has an adhesive property which i dont think it does ? So something else keeps it in position ie a pivot under a cap jewel . But that isn't the case in a pallet jewel situation. 
×
×
  • Create New...