Jump to content

Elgin balance staff


JPRink

Recommended Posts

Dear experts

I have a Elgin pocket watch with serial nr. 34270315
From the database https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/elgin/34270315/movement

it says my Elgin is Model nr. 4 

can you tell me exactly what type of Balance staff i need 
bear in mind I am a novice 
just took my Elgin to the watchmaker in Iceland and he showed me my broken staff.

so I am trying to get a new/used one.

Best regards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Balance staffs are usually identified by 'Ronda number' and it is this number you ideally need. Probably like your watch repairer I've had trouble tracking down a parts list for your calibre that includes this but let's see if we can do a bit of detective work ... B) 

My recommendation is for your watch repairer to confirm dimensions tie up with your movement before ordering. If these dimensions don't pan out for some reason then your watch repairer should be able to identify a correctly dimensioned staff and order by appropriate Ronda number from their usual supplier. imho they should have really gone this route to start with rather than getting you, the customer, to try and find things out. <_<

It's probably worth waiting first for any replies from other forum members who may be more familiar with Elgin movements in case they can come straight up with a specific Ronda number for you. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

usually with American pocket watches even if you have a part number you absolutely still have to measure the staff to verify its dimensions match the one that the part number has. For instance I'm attaching an image you'll notice that even if you have a part number for some staffs they have a lot of variations. Variations lead to frustrations for people that don't grasp that there are variations. Fortunately it appears to be your staff doesn't have variations. Although the parts book I looked in listed the number is 5317 and the image I'm attaching ads the C which conceivably means there's a variation even though it's not shown in the listing.

than the eBay listing above has staff number 4191C which is an entirely different staff than the one that I came up with by looking in the Elgin parts catalog of the 50s. I'm also attaching it the images from the 50s catalog. They can see your serial number range comes up with a number. Then with that number you can look up the part number.

Elgin 495 balance staff.JPG

Elgin 1950 parts catalog 495 staff.JPG

Elgin serial number lookup.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/26/2019 at 8:58 PM, JohnR725 said:

usually with American pocket watches even if you have a part number you absolutely still have to measure the staff to verify its dimensions match the one that the part number has. For instance I'm attaching an image you'll notice that even if you have a part number for some staffs they have a lot of variations. Variations lead to frustrations for people that don't grasp that there are variations. Fortunately it appears to be your staff doesn't have variations. Although the parts book I looked in listed the number is 5317 and the image I'm attaching ads the C which conceivably means there's a variation even though it's not shown in the listing.

than the eBay listing above has staff number 4191C which is an entirely different staff than the one that I came up with by looking in the Elgin parts catalog of the 50s. I'm also attaching it the images from the 50s catalog. They can see your serial number range comes up with a number. Then with that number you can look up the part number.

Elgin 495 balance staff.JPG

Elgin 1950 parts catalog 495 staff.JPG

Elgin serial number lookup.JPG

Thank you for this information 

i found this in Ebay https://www.ebay.com/itm/12s-Elgin-5317C-Balance-Staff/183921896851?hash=item2ad2996d93:g:rKMAAOSw9GRdVzpd

do you think this is the right one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

numerically it looks right but you still have to measure the original and the new staff to make sure all the dimensions are indeed the same. Then one other minor irritation? the problem with visually looking at a new old stock staff is there is no way to tell where it came from. So some of the aftermarket manufacturers will make the staff over size on the grounds that the watchmaker can reduce everything to fit.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎11‎/‎26‎/‎2019 at 3:40 PM, jdrichard said:

This is why I make my own balance shafts...too much risk and cost in ordering one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

   "yea but"  how long would it take to learn make parts with a lathe?   vin

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello good watch folk ,I  just fancied a light hearted discussion after my head was starting to spin over Epilame 😅. Specifically I'm meaning the sale of vintage watches, say nothing past the 1980s market. The stuff we see on ebay and other similar sites and found at carboots, curio shops etc. And are  we thinking its reaching a peak volume ?  Younger generations clearing out passed parents and grandparents possessions.  The younger folk are not as sentimental as the old fogies ( I'm now nearly at an age that i used to think was old fogie age ). When might it have started ?  i often wish i discovered the hobby much much sooner when selling your grandfathers pocket watch at a boot sale for a few quid was just a way to offload some tat. And when might it slow down. Thoughts anyone ?
    • Yes i did eventually realise that the oil will act as a barrier, I'm sure the discussion will continue. Ive had two oleophobic coffees ( added coconut ) and in the meantime i have this just delivered to take my mind off epilame for the time being. My favourite type of dial, its a beautiful looking watch traditional English made and it runs,  the ticktock is phenomenal,  i can hear it across my living room .  You wont believe how much it was. Thats interesting about synthetic oils , i thought the same, going from a 2 year service to 5 years is a big drop in income for service folk.  I expect some did well when they embraced the use of synthetic,  probably drawing in more customers than those that didn't use the new fangled substances , i bet fairly short lived though. The more frequent service makes more sense to me, not for just the service but for the regular check up inspections that might pick up impending faults. As far as epilame goes, wouldn't it be great to be able to fumigate the complete movement in a sealed jar of heated stearic acid, 🤔 now theres a thought 😅.
    • Imm going to close the discussion by attaching the photo of my super-titanium after several vicissitudes finally working. Purchased as not working I replaced the battery and for a stroke of luck I found its semi-new solar panel which, having verified its operation, seems to recharge the accumulator perfectly. I had taken this watch almost by bet, with 40 euros I brought it back to life. The initial half idea was to resell it to finance another purchase, but.. it's definitely a nice item. It would need to check the impermeability but it's a pleasure to see it on the wrist 😃
    • In fact the secret is to go gently and find the way without forcing, and the movement enters without problems
    • Yea a have given it a full service this movement is chinese 2813 whats the lift angle for this movement does anyone knows  and how  do a remove the default  of 52 degrees on my timegrapher?   Hi you said my lift angle is default how do a remove this from my timegrapher?
×
×
  • Create New...