Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, Lc130 said:

The bridge is flat as far as I can tell.  Am I wasting my time at this point?  Should I keep adding layers of foil?

Thank you

Charlie

The reason for these shims is usually after a new balance staff has been fitted which is a bit tight. The correct procedure is to hone the balance to the correct length. However some movements have them fitted as standard. If when you fit a shim the balance runs freely then you have identified the issue. The decision is to decide if the balance staff is too long or does the lower jewel need lowering a tiny bit. To adjust the height of the lower jewel you need a jeweling tool to move it in accurate small increments. 

Posted

This makes sense.  Thank you.  I feared that someone installed any old balance to get it sold.  I'll keep on with the shims.

Posted

My beginner skills are exhausted and have sent this to my watch maker for an opinion.  I'll report back. 

Posted

If the binding persists until such point that pivot get out of jewel hole, some data is generated, we may not at this stage spot the fault, but the generated data is valuable to narrow down possibilities, to be led to finding the fault.

I doubt anyone can see the bent in a staff or pivots unless under high magnification.

I am sure we will get it fixed, no one can gurantee before hand to spot the fault in certain number of go. We,ll just have to dig until we find it.

Best

Posted
6 hours ago, Lc130 said:

My beginner skills are exhausted and have sent this to my watch maker for an opinion.  I'll report back. On 

On don,t give up. We will find the fault and fix it. I go take it back.:roadrage:

Posted

Solved.

Well this is a bit embarrassing.... a real watchmaker, was good enough to take a look. He services my "real" watches here https://timeguy.com/cradek/

As it turned out the HS wasn't level and was rubbing on the balance arm. Others suggested I look there as well. But I missed it altogether. Pics..
orient2.thumb.jpg.737ba5c5c24004bf5996a7e7494fb4b9.jpgorient1.thumb.jpg.a6f992b0fdb3e383536a9c6a45ef1bb4.jpg

Posted

Nothing to be embarrassed about. The lesson here is to inspect the balance when installed under strong light and high magnification. I’m glad that you check the end-shake. I actually thought the end shake looked slightly large. 

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I believe @nickelsilver has a setup like that.
    • I posted pictures earlier in this thread. My lathe and mill are two separate instruments. I think I have seen examples of putting a milling head on a lathe bed...but not certain.
    • Timex Camper, September 1994, new to me. Strap is an old perlon with "Germany" in script etched into the resin on the tail end. Not Horlon or Eulit I believe. History unknown, running strong, losing less than a minute a day. Goals for this: Wear it a ton! Buy crystal lift, clean out the gunk around the ring and under the crystal Eventually swap into a stainless steel case. I've seen a member who has swapped a Timex mechanical movement into the Timex J.Crew quartz field watch case.
    • One of the problems we would have with a watchmaker's lathe is they were made over considerable span of time and manufacturing in the early days probably wasn't as good as it was today. Then if you look at the older catalogs typically it was just the head a few collets and something to rest graver on. So basically a basic lathe with over time things acquired but acquired things may or may not fit. Order today you purchase a used lathe that all kinds of nifty bits and pieces from a seller that acquired from? This would come back to that the basic watchmaker's lathe was used for basic watchmaking like turning things with a hand graver. Then limited indexing is fine because you can make things like stems Which don't need a whole bunch indexing   In the link above the word vector is mentioned and at the link below you can purchase one. Then of course you're going to need the motor that's a little bit extra for the price. https://www.hswalsh.com/product/lathe-vector-watchmakers-48-collets-hl11. That you're going to need some bonus parts like these found this picture online show the classic way of classic gear cutting.   The lathe could have a much bigger indexing disk but it has to be mounted close to the edge. Otherwise you're going to have a whole bunch of smaller disks like this which I think has notches rather than holes. Then as wonderful as these pictures look actually cutting a gear with this is not entirely fun. Look at all is belts all pulling on things and this is a watchmaker's lathe lightweight with lots of bits and pieces attached. It would make more sense if you actually cut a gear with something like this and it tends to be it's not really the best way to do it looks nice on paper but it is not the best way to go. Reality for cutting watch parts would be a bigger machine is much better. Than getting rid of all those belts and pulleys also good. Here is an interesting channel I would've liked of found a different video but this was nice and short if you look at his video as he uses a stepping motor and worm gear assembly for the indexing plate. In this particular video it gets attached to the lathe at about one minute and seven seconds and it looks like it's hiding looks like he has a Sherline. I do know he's had other stuff you'll just have to go through his videos to find it. Then at about one minute and 22 seconds you find out if you set up things appropriately. It's always bad we end up with half a tooth at the very end. Then you will note big lathe yes he's getting a big gear but you could easily cut a watch gear with the setup. And it definitely way more stable than a watchmaker's lathe.         Oh here's a company they been in business since 1911 http://www.fwderbyshireinc.com/  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
×
×
  • Create New...