Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just finished servicing an 1894 Illinois 18s pocket watch. It was filthy. Came out great except for two things. It’s running 300+ seconds fast at the slowest setting. No problem, I can add timing washers. However my timegrapher is showing an amplitude of 152 degrees. My slow-mo video shows a healthy 300+ degrees rotation. Any ideas why the timegrapher would show such a large difference from the visual check?

 

The performance is very similar in dial up & down and crown up positions. I’m stumped. The timegrapher is new and has appeared accurate on other watches.

 

Regards and thank you!!

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

It would help if we could see a picture of the timing machine results. Then preferably two positions would be nice at a minimum. One of the dial positions and crown up because it's a pocket watch.  

Then a picture of the balance wheel would be nice preferably when it's not running so we can see what it looks like.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

This is quite an informative document in general if you have a timegrapher: https://www.witschi.com/assets/files/sheets/Witschi Training Course.pdf

Given that the amplitude is calculated by the machine as "the time between the first pulse and the third pulse of the beat noise" could there be something that is causing an unexpected noise in between that is causing the timegrapher to throw up its wrong calculation? It's perhaps notable that the machine's calculation and your observation are a factor of two out (152 vs 300+).

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I’ll try your suggestions when I get back to the homestead. Away on business for a few days.

Thanks team!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Just a suggestion to make sure that you are comparing apples with apples....

The amplitude reported by the Timgrapher is the rotation angle between the resting position of the balance when there is no power on the mainspring (with the impulse jewel sitting between the horns of the pallet fork) and either one of the extremes of rotation (the point at which it reverses direction). The total angle of rotation (extreme clockwise point, through the pallet fork, and then out to extreme anticlockwise point) is double the amplitude.

I mention this just in case you are looking at the slow mo video and comparing the total angle of rotation with the Timegrapher results, which would result in discrepancy by a factor of 2.

  • Like 2
Posted

Hi there...

Just a couple of thoughts for you. Check you have not accidently placed any oil on the balance spring, check its not magnetised and check (you said it was filthy) there is not some residue or gunk after cleaning that is causing the spring coils to stick...any of these things will cause that massive +300/day issue. If you can look at the action under magnification, you should be able to pick up such an abnormality.

Cheers

  • Like 2
Posted
Just a suggestion to make sure that you are comparing apples with apples....
The amplitude reported by the Timgrapher is the rotation angle between the resting position of the balance when there is no power on the mainspring (with the impulse jewel sitting between the horns of the pallet fork) and either one of the extremes of rotation (the point at which it reverses direction). The total angle of rotation (extreme clockwise point, through the pallet fork, and then out to extreme anticlockwise point) is double the amplitude.
I mention this just in case you are looking at the slow mo video and comparing the total angle of rotation with the Timegrapher results, which would result in discrepancy by a factor of 2.


I did not know that. However, if that is the case, why do my other watches, and those I’ve seen in videos here and on marks you tube, show a good amplitude of around 240-260 degrees?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Posted
2 hours ago, ITProDad said:

I did not know that. However, if that is the case, why do my other watches, and those I’ve seen in videos here and on marks you tube, show a good amplitude of around 240-260 degrees?

 

Because they are OK in balance pivot, escapement, and mainspring, while your P/W it is not. We no way to know why ,you can read many threads about "reduced amplitude", hope you can find out.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, ITProDad said:

I did not know that. However, if that is the case, why do my other watches, and those I’ve seen in videos here and on marks you tube, show a good amplitude of around 240-260 degrees?

As JDM alludes to in his response, a movement in good order from the mainspring through to the escapement should reasonably be expected to have an amplitude of between about 270 and 300 degrees unless designed otherwise, the highest that I've seen has been about 320 but this is not common (talking here about Swiss lever type escapements, not sure how this might vary with English lever or cylinder escapements). This means that the total angle of rotation between the two extremes of swing will be in the order of 540 to 600 degrees. Theoretically it is possible for the amplitude to be as high as perhaps 355 degrees before the impulse pin crashes into the outside of the pallet fork, however this is undesirable as amplitude can be affected by  movement of the watch during use; a watch with an amplitude of 355 on the timing machine could well find that a quick twist of the wrist has the balance crashing against the wrong side of the pallet fork with potential for damage.

If your Timegrapher is showing an amplitude of 152 degrees (assuming that you have the correct lift angle set for the movement under test) then that would indicate a problem with the movement. It might also explain why the rate is so high as at very low amplitudes the rate can increase considerably.

To improve things you are going to have to go back in and do some trouble shooting.

  • Like 1
Posted

Thank you Marc. I had not considered the relationship between a low (and fast) amplitude increasing the beat rate. Makes perfect sense! I’ve simply not run into that occurrence. I will take a look at the amplitude more closely before I add timing weights or washers. The hairspring looks to have been re-pinned as it has near a centimeter of “extra” length beyond the stud. Perhaps I’ll consider re-pinning the stud and lengthening the hairspring. Of course I’ll need to adjust the collet for beat error, but it might be the most appropriate fix.

I genuinely appreciate everyone’s input! Thank you.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

@Marc and JDM!
I was misinterpreting what the amplitude means. I was looking at the rotation of the balance wheel with the tic and too extremes. Not per beat.

Thank you for the welcome lesson in understanding one more facet of my love of mechanical watches. Sincere thanks!!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 9/22/2019 at 4:46 PM, ITProDad said:

I just finished servicing an 1894 Illinois 18s pocket watch. It was filthy. Came out great except for two things. It’s running 300+ seconds fast at the slowest setting. No problem, I can add timing washers. However my timegrapher is showing an amplitude of 152 degrees. My slow-mo video shows a healthy 300+ degrees rotation. Any ideas why the timegrapher would show such a large difference from the visual check?

I notice quoting your original question that you have a timegrapher which one? Then can we have pictures really helpful for making diagnostics?

Then in comparison with a "1894 Illinois 18s pocket watch " Versus a modern wristwatch you're going to notice differences. Like for instance the lift angle it's probably not 52° that's going to change or amplitude on the Timing machine a little bit. Plus your Watch is 125 years old a lot of people of touched it between when it left the factory and now a lot of very creative people lots of strange things have occurred. It also be nice to have a picture of the balance wheel looking straight down there's things we need to look at their in addition to the timing machine results.

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this post MikePilk, I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :) I removed the automatic module so I could access the spring and work on it. Once I bent it back close to the right shape, I experienced the same problem you reported about power loss.  Many tweaks later, and the seconds hand is moving properly again, with amplitude back to good numbers again. Cheers
    • After cleaning up the pivots, I made bushes on the lathe. At this point I've pressed in 6 bushes (3 sets) and the wheels turn smooth. What I can also tell you, is that I'm not looking forward to final assembly. Getting the pivots aligned seems to get exponentially more difficult with each wheel that is added.
    • Islands are interesting places to live depending upon their size and other factors. This is a bigger island and it has a bridge to get there at least on one end. It's also big enough that you don't have to go someplace else to get things typically. It can be a problem if you get a job in Seattle though. Yes I've known of people who commuted from the island to Seattle for a job and I don't quite remember how many hours it took but it took a long time. So basically islands are nice if you don't have to leave very often.
    • Thanks @JohnR725! Everything you say makes a lot of sense and is encouraging to read.
    • isn't it nice to have a decent case open or when the case doesn't want to be opened? In the case of a Rolex watch that supposed to pass specific water resistant testing you probably do need to tighten the back down. But they shouldn't be tightened so much that they risk stripping the threads out. Then the other problem that comes up is the gaskets can start to disintegrate and then getting the back off can be quite a challenge unless you have a really good tool and perhaps some penetrating oil to loosen things up. Yes really nice case marking. When I was in school we were taught to mark the cases and  the American watch and clockmakers Institute even had a? So if you joined at one time they would give you an identification number. They were explaining or giving an example of if the watches ever found in you have a unique number they can perhaps figure out the history of the watch or identify the body it's attached to for instance not that that probably comes up that often. So you got a unique number and even made a special metal stamp that you can purchase. It wasn't a super big aggressive stamp but still it left a mark in the back of the case. Then I heard from people at work on Rolex watches they were using a felt pen indelible but later on they decided that was bad because apparently the ink could release  chemicals although it seems like once it's dry that shouldn't be an issue. Then of course today was nice is you can keep computer records sealed have to mark anything at all I personally find it's best to leave no reference behind that you were even there. Especially when you have a beautiful watch that has no markings at all and now it has your scribbling all over it not good typically if there is a typical and watch repair?  a lot of minor repairs you don't need to do a complete servicing. But beyond a certain point you're going to have to take apart a lot of stuff you're going to disrupt the lubrication even if it looks perfect right now and yes you might as well just go ahead the service the whole thing. also in a watch like this where a lot of things seem to be going on the complete service would be better then you'll know exactly where you stand versus dealing with unknown mysteries for prior repair.
×
×
  • Create New...