Jump to content

Smoothing versus cutting broaches: Do I need both?


rduckwor

Recommended Posts

You don't need a  smoothing broach for a hand. The smoothing broaches are for smoothing the in side of a bush. These ready to use bushes, the brass is so soft a cutting broach is all you need, if you look in side the bush after cutting it is left smooth so much it looks as if it has been burnished. That is all a smooth broach does, is burnish.  

Always use good broaches, they will always keep there cutting edges. Cheap won't last long.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, rduckwor said:

I need to clean out the pipe on a second hand.  Smoothing versus cutting broaches? 


Thanks,


RMD

Well, A cutting broach will, of course, make the hole larger and so if you wish the hand to still fit the pivot then smoothing broach is the way to go, depends on if you want to remove material or not ;) but be careful, even though they are smoothing broaches they may still bind in the hole as you turn and you run the risk of breaking the hand.

 

6 hours ago, oldhippy said:

You don't need a  smoothing broach for a hand. The smoothing broaches are for smoothing the in side of a bush. These ready to use bushes, the brass is so soft a cutting broach is all you need, if you look in side the bush after cutting it is left smooth so much it looks as if it has been burnished. That is all a smooth broach does, is burnish.  

Always use good broaches, they will always keep there cutting edges. Cheap won't last long.  

To be fair, I have found smoothing broaches useful for clearing out stubborn debris. I remember finding what I suspect was glue in a seconds hand pipe once and couldn't use acetone due to the hand being painted.

 

@rduckwor I have merged your "dual post" as it keeps the forum cleaner. Kindly be patient in waiting for other members to respond rather than opening new topics with the same subject matter - many people are on different time-zones - have jobs - or are simply spending time with family ;) 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Mark said:

Well, A cutting broach will, of course, make the hole larger and so if you wish the hand to still fit the pivot then smoothing broach is the way to go, depends on if you want to remove material or not ;) but be careful, even though they are smoothing broaches they may still bind in the hole as you turn and you run the risk of breaking the hand.

 

To be fair, I have found smoothing broaches useful for clearing out stubborn debris. I remember finding what I suspect was glue in a seconds hand pipe once and couldn't use acetone due to the hand being painted.

 

@rduckwor I have merged your "dual post" as it keeps the forum cleaner. Kindly be patient in waiting for other members to respond rather than opening new topics with the same subject matter - many people are on different time-zones - have jobs - or are simply spending time with family ;) 

    correct me if i am wrong,  broches come in a set.   "roughing and smoothing".   vin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

Normally in sets. The very large clock ones can be bought separately.   Interesting to read Marks view about glue in the pipe, not come across that before. 

'nor me since! Some silly sod's attempt at securing a loose fitting hand. Granted about 15 odd years ago but silly stuff sticks in the mind :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have use a pin vice for chronograph second hands, you can do it, but only if you are talking a couple of hundredths of a mm.

Go slowly tighten only a little bit and test fit, easy to close it a bit more, real PITA if you go too far and have to open it out again with broach.

Bergeon of course sells a special tool to do this if you have a few hundred pound spare, else get by with a pin vice, just make sure it is a good quality one that closes evenly so all sides (or 4 spots evenly spaced) get closed in evenly.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tmuir said:

Bergeon of course sells a special tool to do this if you have a few hundred pound spare

 

Ugh.  I see broaches are not free either. 

Something else to add into the "Want List".  Projects get set aside until I can get back to them and I am running out of room as I go broke!

But I'm having a fantastic time.  Thanks Mark!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is not rare at all, the dial code and case code don't usually match.
    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
×
×
  • Create New...