Jump to content

What Happened To This Old Hamilton?


Recommended Posts

Several years ago I bought a 'lot' box of watches and this old Hamilton was in there. The watch is nothing special, but the watch back has always confused me. I'm not sure what happened or why the back was trimmed or scared or whatever may have happened. Just wondering if anyone has seen this before.

Regards

Dave in Mexico Beach, FL USA

IMG_8827.JPG

IMG_2032.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is it had what the kids call a NATO strap nowadays, a web (could have been leather) strap that's just threaded through the spring bars. Probably gold filled case, once the gold was worn through the base metal eroded away.

What movement is in there? Hamilton had some beautiful wristwatch movements. May be worth having the back repaired (can be filled in with gold solder by a good jeweler).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It certainly looks odd.

It could be rubbing from some sort of Nato strap as suggested (with the caseback rotated 90 degrees clockwise and the "bump" currently at the bottom, instead next to the winder).


Another posibility, perhaps it was kept on a harder metal (silver perhaps) chain round someone's neck, , as a keepsake, or worn on a metal edged continuous bracelet similar to a Nato strap.

The bump on the bottom of the case back is also fairly mysterious, assuming it isn't simply meant to line up with the winder.

Is the caseback actually gold I wonder? If not, then perhaps brazing or silver soldering, followed by gold plating might be the most appropriate way to repair it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, AndyHull said:

It certainly looks odd.

It could be rubbing from some sort of Nato strap as suggested (with the caseback rotated 90 degrees clockwise and the "bump" currently at the bottom, instead next to the winder).


Another posibility, perhaps it was kept on a harder metal (silver perhaps) chain round someone's neck, , as a keepsake, or worn on a metal edged continuous bracelet similar to a Nato strap.

The bump on the bottom of the case back is also fairly mysterious, assuming it isn't simply meant to line up with the winder.

Is the caseback actually gold I wonder? If not, then perhaps brazing or silver soldering, followed by gold plating might be the most appropriate way to repair it.

 

Thanks for both replies. This is the first I've seen this watch in many years. I will open the back and take a pic of the movement. The sides are well worn away and a Nato type strap seemed so out of place for this era watch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are pics of the movement and inside case back. It appears to have been repaired several times in the past Case back looks like it was brazed or some type of fill. It has many service marks so it was well looked after for a very long time.

IMG_0808.JPG

IMG_9107.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I seriously doubt that to be wear. I looks too deliberate.Plus a person with a watch regularly serviced would not have allowed it to wear so much .It was altered for some purpose and then "repaired".Attend to the movement first, you have some rust issues.then look into that case.

Edited by yankeedog
content
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, yankeedog said:

I seriously doubt that to be wear. I looks too deliberate.Plus a person with a watch regularly serviced would not have allowed it to wear so much .It was altered for some purpose and then "repaired".Attend to the movement first, you have some rust issues.then look into that case.

It is next in line on my bench to be serviced. The case doesn't bother me, in fact, I like the history it tells. It appears the worn areas have been repaired or an attempt to repair was made in the past. I did a bit of research and found it to be a Hamilton Endicott. It was sold starting on Oct 15th, 1938.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

  the 2 flats were ground on the case back to use a large cresent wrench to un srew it.   some times 2 holes were drilled in the case back for a spanner wrench.   this is done to scrap out the watch. vin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, vinn3 said:

  the 2 flats were ground on the case back to use a large cresent wrench to un srew it.   some times 2 holes were drilled in the case back for a spanner wrench.   this is done to scrap out the watch. vin

But, this is a snap-on case back. The bump is the pry spot and although worn still retains a sure snap when opening or closing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...