Jump to content

Educate Me Experts


bjd1020

Recommended Posts

I don't know if the difference in clocks is the same as it is as in for example ETA movements. ETA claims their movements come in four grades; Standard, Elaborated, Top, and Chronometer. 
The biggest differences in these are the quality of the shock resistance , the balance wheel ,hairspring , the regulator , pallet stones and the mainspring. 
Other features one can see is them being decorated and in the amount of positions they are tuned;  the decoration was made to prevent oil from escaping to other parts of the watch but with the introduction of synthetic oils its more of a decorative feature.
The more expensive grades has a Glucydur balance instead of a nickel balance;  Glucydur primarialy are made of beryllium, copper and iron and is said to resist deformation from temperature change and shockbetter than the ordinary balance wheel in nickel. 
You can identifie the Glucydur balance by its radiused spokes; the nickel balance has straight spokes. The hairspring in the lower grades is Nivarox hairsprings and in the higher they are called Anachron here the difference is also said to be the alloy used.
The difference in jewels is in the manufacturing process, the cheaper is pressed out of a finer material while the higher grade jewels are said to be cut in the traditional way.
Then there is the shock protection system, Novodiac verses Incablock , hard to say why one should be better than the other.
The regulator in the higher grades should be a micro regulator making finer tuning possible.

By the pictures abowe I would Imagine the same theories would apply here.

Edited by HSL
swinglish
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The second one ( screwless stud carier ) is more advanced, mostly its HS is, due to metalurgical advancement in crystaline structure, with features like,  Integrated stud, integrated collet therefore fixed length, thanks to enhance resistance to deformation and decreased thermal expansion.

Fixed length HS among others mentioned above or not, brought at disposal production  and easy installation of a meaningful disposable complete balance, to save us all the pain of adjusting balance+ HS anew, every time a staff broke or anything that went wrong for that matter. With fixed collet balance complete, all you got to do is to drop the complete BW in place, attach and regulate, together with mobile stud arm, they made bringing into beat the impulse as easy as 1. 2. 3. 

Regards

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is not much to add. It has all been said. The one on the left looks like something from a Chinese movement, from the way the hairspring is attached. Modern balances are manufactured in the best materials for coping with modern day life and living conditions.  

You can find out all you need on the Internet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is not much to add. It has all been said. The one on the left looks like something from a Chinese movement, from the way the hairspring is attached. Modern balances are manufactured in the best materials for coping with modern day life and living conditions.  
You can find out all you need on the Internet.
Thanks for taking the time to chime in.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not at all an expert on the subject, but two points which clearly set the two apart are (see photo):

A. The design seems to allow for fine radial adjustment of the shoe. 95ff206303796508bbfbf6adfada559e.jpg
B. The hair spring is terminated by a means other than traditional stud. I’ve seen tissot ladies watches terminated similarly with what appears to be green resin. The disadvantage seems that it would be difficult to remove the hairspring from the cock. Advantages??? I’m not sure.

As I say, I’m not an expert and therefore cannot say which is the better of the two, but just adding my observations for conversation

Regards
Deggsie


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, I was referring to the (jewelled) gear train with HP (most of the time, I use 1300, but when Rolex says 1000, I'll use 1000).
    • did I miss the update of the message of something changing?      
    • I suppose it would depend upon what your lubricating with those? for instance what does the manufacturer say about those lubricants? I have a PDF from the manufacture and a rather peculiar statement found on the bottom of the chart. my suspicion is the reason the recommending would be without epilam the HP oils like the spread except when they're in Ruby jewel's with steel pivots. tableEN lubrication 2020.pdf
    • These types of hairsprings become weak with age and very fragile. Which I expect it is that giving you trouble, and that wheel is not the correct one, if it were not bent I don't think the movement would run as the teeth are not the correct height. The problem you have is price which depends on you. It can be repaired but is it worth it to you, because there is little value in the clock. A wheel can be made and hairspring replaced. Or hang on to it and keep looking on ebay which is your best bet for replacement parts or even a complete movement but it will be like finding a needle in a haystack. 
    • I did that also for a few movements - well, mainly in/around the train jewels. I made big efforts to epilame the mainplate WITHOUT getting Epilame into the Pallet fork jewels (where it's not supposed to be, right?). I made litte barriers with Rodico around that jewel and used drops from a syringe to apply on the rest.  However, I've now stopped doing this. For three reasons: 1. It's a hassle and consumes more of this liquid gold. 2. I didn't see the need when using HP1000/HP1300 lubricants and grease for most part. The two places where I'd use 9010 (i.e. escape wheel and balance) receive Epilame in specific places... or the cap-jewel-setting of the balance suspends the oil sufficiently be capillary action (see my "conflict" about using Epilame on the balance jewels).  3. Lastly, and here I really wonder about yours and others' experiences: I felt that applying Epliame to the train jewels left them looking hazy (borderline dirty) compared to the (painstakingly achieved) sparkly clean results of my cleaning process. I just can't help but think that the Epilame residuals would mix with the oil and cause more friction/wear. I don't know.    simple: it'll stay there. It won't move any further. That's exactly what is happening if you epilame a cap stone. You end up placing the 9010 right on top of the epilame and the oil will sit nicely on that spot.
×
×
  • Create New...