Jump to content

Strange behavior in old movement


Recommended Posts

Hi again,

 

Working on an old (as usual) movement from one ofthe tank style watches mentioned in another topic.

 

Had to fit a new ms but otherwise it all seems pretty ok after a cleanup.

 

And the thing runs but with a strange bahavior on the timegrapher app. Screen shot attached.

 

The beat error switches between a decent 1 ms to around 6 ms and during these periods the curves slope heavily, indicating a drastic and immediate slow down. The behavior is periodic and switches several times per minute in a regular fashion.

 

I suspected over banking and tried a weaker ms that gave a lower amplitude. No change.

 

I also shifted the hs to check if the beat setting influenced. No change with a different beat setting (even though the beat error changed a lot).

 

All pivots appear nice and straight to the eye.

 

My assumption is that this problem should be located close to the escapement, considering how the error repeats...?

 

Any advice or experience is appreciated.

0124d30fea05c816f100f1569a39445c.png

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi there:    The got no pic you talk of. anyway

How about amplitute in various positions, face up/ down , side and oblique.

wobling escape wheel? .... fork arbor qnd staff  end shake, .slight push down on balance staff jewels too see if it stops balance wheel.

Regards joe.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No need to remove any part to produce the aforementioed data. 

Next.

1. Loosen the escape cab screw if any. 

If no change. One drop of lighter fluid on staff ,escape and fork arbor jewels

If no change, try removal of cabs to see the jewels, broken....etc

If none observed, remove balance cock and fork bridge. Oil jewels and wind manually for several seconds. Observe.

While at it check pallet alignment as well.

Timegraph dose not diagnose.

Velocity fluctuation as you describe is common and expectedly from escape wheel.

Regards joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi guys and thanks for feedback.

Was working through the balance and 35587c44267d614226adec35cebb0b11.jpgescapement along your advice when one of those things not supposed to happen... well, happened... Had a Major flip of the balance cock while holding the wheel and ending up with a h/s all twisted and mangled. Unless I can find a part, I guess I will never know what was causing the problem.

I have attached a photo of the marking on the movement which is unknown to me. If anyone knows of this I’m grateful for feedback to start a search for parts.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

Not giving up on this one yet....

Here are a couple of photos that hopefully can help to id this movement.

The key-less part is in my experience somewhat unusual as the yoke and spring are on separate sides of the winding stem. I usually see the spring sitting right beside the yoke. Maybe this ”feature” can be of guidance....?

46fe1b60d51bab4215ee20af8ccd4d34.jpg54a71ed67894cdcbe5483ffb6dedf6ee.jpg




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

Thanks to Watchmaker and WLS1971, two excellent watch sleuths, two out of three ongoing identification questions have been resolved. 

A Derby 33 and a Bifora 102, no common movements on my list. Had never heard of the brands before. But amazingly enough some parts are available and I have some incoming. 

But this headache remains...

I just noted a small imprint on the balance cock (a "V" it looks like) and was wondering if that perhaps rings a bell somewhere...?

A close up photo is attached.

 

 

 

 

 

IMG_E4500[1].JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://watchguy.co.uk/cgi-bin/files?showfile=Venus/Venus 178.pdf&filename=Venus 178.pdf&dir=Technical Manuals&action=documents   The hour recorder is driven by the barrel and it will only stop if it is held by the hour recorder stop lever 8690. So I would check if this lever (powered by the spring 8691) is really holding the hour recorder in the "chrono off status". I haven't worked on a Venus 178 so far, but on an Omega 861 I chose 9501 grease for the friction spring as it's moving very slow at quite high tension.
    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
×
×
  • Create New...