Jump to content

Roxedo Manual Wind EB 8800


AndyHull

Recommended Posts

On impulse I picked up a clean-ish looking "Roxedo" EB 800 based manual wind for £2.00

I'm a complete amateur when it comes to fixing watches, although I do quite a lot of soldering of very small things (one of my long term interests is electronics), and I did tinker with and occasionally fix a lot with watches and clocks as a kid, so I know what makes them tick.

I suspected the watch might have been dropped, from the description, but it turns out the pallet fork pins have vanished. I removed the offending item and examined it very closely with a loupe. Everything is back together at the moment, and the balance is still intact, so I haven't lost my touch.

My question is this. If I can source the pallet fork (a big if, since I have only a vague idea where to look for one), what are the chances that the escape wheel may have been damaged by the explosive unwinding that no doubt took place when the pins parted company with the fork? It looks OK to my untrained eye, but I'm no expert.

In other words, is it worth sourcing the fork and replacing it, and in the process no doubt more than doubling how much I have ploughed into my "investment":D or am I likely to need to also source the escape wheel too.

My supplementary question is where would I find the necessary parts?

I've attached a couple of pictures, but they are not particularly detailed (though if you look carefully you can just about see the remains of one of the pins lying on the fork in the first image).

Roxedo-8800 2018-10-18 21-21-57.png

RIMG0392.JPG

Roxedo-EB8800.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're doing the right thing investigating and finding your way around an inexpensive movement to start with!

It's difficult to say if there may be other problems. This is a simple and sturdy pin lever movement but if there was an incident that was violent enough to break the pins from the pallet fork that doesn't bode well! My attention was also immediately drawn to the fact that there would normally be a jewel in that balance wheel but you have none .... however a quick check shows the EB 8800 came in 0, 1, 17 and 21 versions so you must have the base model with no jewels.

It is possible to still get spare parts for vintage movements. If you go to https://www.cousinsuk.com/category/filter/eb-movement-parts for instance and select 8800 as the EB Calibre Number and then click 'Search For Items' you'll see all the parts it's possible to get for your 8800. These are prices ex-VAT and you'd need to factor in postage. You can see that you'll soon rank up a bill where just the spares outweigh the whole value of your movement so...

... assuming you want to continue then your best bet would  be to source another (or more than one) spare 8800 movement from a site like ebay and then exchange parts as necessary i.e. make one good movement from the two (or move) movements you have. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This may seem like a rather obvious question to some, however just to be clear I take it that if I have an 8800 (or 880X) movement, that has zero jewels and one that has for example 17 jewels, are the majority of components (theoretically at least) interchangeable.

Clearly if one has a jeweled escapement and one has a pinned one, then these parts would be different, but things like cogs, barrels, mainsprings, key-less work etc, and even hands would be swappable from one to the other.

I ask, because in my quest for the world's cheapest watch collection (with a self imposed budget of no more then £4.04  +p&p per watch) I picked up an 8800 based Adrem, which has a 17jewel movement, and which has a winding issue (the mainspring often slips alarmingly when wound).

Is the mainspring issue likely to be wear (the ratchet is not slipping), or the spring itself. A further hint, if I gently press on the retaining bride that holds the barrel in place, the watch does in fact wind).

Can I swap the spring and barrel etc from the Roxedo to the Adrem?

 


Picture of the Adrem to follow.

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pictures of the EB 8800 based Adrem 17 jewels.

Adrem17jewelEB8800.thumb.jpg.c7c726cc790880e7775d53c1d03045de.jpg

 

The first image is the state when it arrived.

 

RIMG0413.thumb.JPG.f5a2f709b20ea478b6a36d1f13522889.JPG

The crystal was been polished and this showed up a bunch of flaws on the dial, so that was removed, and carefully cleaned.

CleanedDial.thumb.png.97633b002ae772ce9091e3b3a8cd54e4.png

There was a fingerprint etched into the original finish coating, and the finish had become very flat and matte over the years, with a number of scratches so the face was carefully brushed, degreased and a light rub of denatured alcohol was applied to lightly key whatever finish remained.

Next a very fine misting of clear-coat was applied, followed by a second.

I don't want to add any height obviously as this may foul the hands. Initial inspection suggests this has done the trick and hidden the majority of the flaws.

The clear-coat has added a little depth to the blues of the dial. I don't think the pictures do it any justice. What appears in the photo to be a possible issue near the bottom left is actually a very delicate gold accent, and the effect is quite pleasing. 

I should really concentrate on getting it working reliably next.

Once I let the face dry and refit the hands to see if I'm satisfied with the results of course. 

It may not be worth much, but it actually looks quite good so far.

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi @AndyHull - ah there you are! Wondered what had happened as no 'Thanks' or 'Like' tag to earlier advice. :huh:

To help further though ...

... a really useful resource is Dr. Roland Ranfft's website on watch movements. So if you google, for instance, ranfft EB8800 and click on the first link that comes up you'll see your movement along with those in the same family. On the left under 'Data' you can see the info that shows that these movements came with 0, 1, 17 or 21 jewels, run at 18,000 A/h etc. On the right you'll see the family information.

In general then, yes, you can exchange parts within the same immediate family e.g. they have the same ligne size, same amplitude etc.. Most often a movement family starts with a base manual wind model ... then the next step is to add a date ... then a day ... then an automatic etc. No reason that a common part from one member of the family won't fit another movement in the same family. The maker of the watch (Adrem vs. Roxedo in your case) is not relevant ... it's the movement (family) that is.

Your budget watch seems to be coming on nicely and is a really good (and cheap!) way to find your way around a movement etc. :Bravo:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Andy  thought I had a  cheap watch collection. To me any watch or clock that does not work is a ornament  and fixing it a challenge.   Had a shufty  at cousins uk where I get my parts. 

the pin pallet is £5.96.   Escape wheel  £6.55 then factor in vat and postage I guess that,s not too bad . I should have to wonder what sheared the pallet pins, If dropped the balance would have gone . one possibillity is one pin broke through wear and this caused the power surge which broke the other. The escape wheel teeth on pin lever watches are quite strong but I would check its running flat Poised. I have enclosed a PDF of the EB8800  (bettelach) an eubaches make .  hope you find this useful.

2849_EB 8800etc.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It looks like the canon pinion function is part of this great wheel. The pinion nearest the clip runs the minute wheel on the dual side. The pinion nearest the wheel is driven by a small wheel from under the setting lever cover plate that engages in hand setting position.    So when assembled the crown was driving the whole great train. Does this mean the pinions are too tight? Should I attempt to disassemble this great wheel and lubricants?
    • Picking up this side-tracked post again as I just removed a balance staff of a 1920's Omega (35,5L-T1) I was impressed by the way @Delgetti had his setup when he had to change out a balance-staff (https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/28854-new-balance-staff-not-riveting-to-balance/page/2/#comment-244054 Not only that, but also the idea of removing the seat first before punching the staff out from the seat-side, avoiding the whole discussion of the rivet yes/no enlarging the hole. I didn't have the fancy clamps & tools Delgetti has, so I used my screw-head polishing tool. Initially I used #1500 grit diamond paste on the steel wheel, which kinda worked, but very slow. I changed to #800 grit diamond paste, which worked better, but still slow. Then I glued #240 sanding paper to the steel disk; That worked and the disk was hand-driven. Once close to the balance wheel, I took the sanding paper off and continued with #800 diamond paste. One can only do this when the balance wheel sits true on the staff and has no "wobble". I went on grinding until I saw some diamond paste on the rim of the balance wheel. This was as far as I could grind and it seemed that there wasn't much left of the seat. Carefully, with my staking set, I knocked the staff from the seat-side out. Turns out that the thickness of the seat left, now a small ring, was only 0.1mm. The balance wheel hole is in perfect shape and no damage done to the wheel at all. Of course, if the wheel has a "wobble" or isn't seated true on the balance staff, you can't get as close and there will be more left of the seat. In my case, it worked perfect 🙂 I'm very happy how this method worked out ! 😊  
    • As is tradition, one step forward, two steps back. Got the board populated and soldered into place without any issues.   But no hum. So I started testing the coils with an ohmmeter. I got 5.84k ohms across D1 (from red to red in the picture below), which is as expected. But I'm getting an open circuit for the other drive coil and feedback coil, D2 and F1 (from green to each of the two yellows).   Since the movement was working with my breadboard setup, it implies I somehow broke the connection between the coils and the solder lugs. They're all the way at the bottom of the lugs, but maybe the heat migrated down and broke the connections? I guess it's possible it happened while cleaning the flux off, but I used a soft artist's brush and isopropyl alcohol. I did a lot of high magnification examination, and I don't see any issues, but let me know if you see anything I missed or if you can think of anything else I should check.
    • 1947 NOS Ambassador 'C'. Actually, the case came without the movement so the movement isn't NOS, but she sure is pretty.
    • Hi attached is the AS 20XX. Service sheet although there is no 2063 mentioned it may be of some use to you AS_AS 2060,1,2,6,4,6.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...