Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a generic ETA 2824 watch that came with a completely incorrect and ill-fitting acrylic crystal. It's a rather annoying case design that removes the movement via the front, so a crystal lift is required. The back also needs to be opened, to release the stem.

I ordered a new Sternkreuz HW high-dome crystal from Cousins, thinking that I could use my lift to insert it, but the dome shape is too slanted, and the lift won't grab it. My lifter is a old-school version of the modern Indian/Chinese ones (as pictured below) -- probably older than I am.

Does anyone know what kind of crystal model I need to order for use with a lift?

Question 2: Has anyone tried the cheaper high-dome crystals Cousins offers? They are called "DPA watch crystals". I normally install Sternkreuz N-series low-dome crystals.

 

s-l225.jpg

Posted

Hi,

HW glasses are easy to grip. Maybe your tool has an issue or the glass sits so very deep in the case that the steep glass edge vanishes.

Do you have a picture?

The cheap glass assortments were discussed here already.

Frank

 

  • Like 1
Posted

I found the Chinese crystal lift tool was poor and did not work . However the Used Bergeon lift tool I purchased works great. I have read the Chinese crystal lift tool does work if the claws are dressed.

Posted
  • the "multi claw tool"  is only going to work on some crystols.  the crystol shape (lunate, semi lunate - etc.)  is not your problem ,  it is how it fits into the "bezil area".  that why the original type crystal is best.  if i find the best way to install a troublesome one is to remove the mvt., and press it in from the back with the proper tool or your thubs.  vin
Posted
7 hours ago, vinn3 said:
  • the "multi claw tool"  is only going to work on some crystols.  the crystol shape (lunate, semi lunate - etc.)  is not your problem ,  it is how it fits into the "bezil area".  that why the original type crystal is best.  if i find the best way to install a troublesome one is to remove the mvt., and press it in from the back with the proper tool or your thubs.  vin

    thumbs?

Posted
15 hours ago, praezis said:

HW glasses are easy to grip. Maybe your tool has an issue or the glass sits so very deep in the case that the steep glass edge vanishes.

Do you have a picture?

Sure!

crystal-lift.jpg.e9ab33b45d842ebb8ac02604bb2f34b9.jpg

 

Quote

The cheap glass assortments were discussed here already

OK. I tried searching for permutations of "[cheap] glass assortment", but haven't seen anything so far.

Cheers!

      Rob

Posted
13 hours ago, vinn3 said:
  • the "multi claw tool"  is only going to work on some crystols.  the crystol shape (lunate, semi lunate - etc.)  is not your problem ,  it is how it fits into the "bezil area".  that why the original type crystal is best.  if i find the best way to install a troublesome one is to remove the mvt., and press it in from the back with the proper tool or your thubs.  vin

The movement can't be installed from the back because the dial is too big. So the movement has to be installed from the front, then the glass fitted. Then the stem is installed and the back is closed. 

I took some more piccies:

1) Original crystal that is only held (lightly) by the dial itself. Totally incorrect.. 

rotary-1.jpg.34a997b2b52a26fd3ad665a6a059d587.jpg

 

2) Without crystal. Bezel fitting is normal V-shape that should take a normal slanted bezel.

rotary-2.jpg.800f9cda56c0e0689f42cf12a7e017cf.jpg

 

3) New bezel lying loosely on top of watch

rotary-3.jpg.7a088e481ea81d4333695dcdec2f7fdd.jpg

 

4) Back of watch

rotary-4.jpg.eecd00586ef3f329f4bbb59c6f456483.jpg

Posted

Looks like the dial protrudes too much, maybe a special glass with narrow bottom is needed?

I did not find your phrases at cousins, have a link?

Frank

Posted
On 7/28/2018 at 5:52 PM, rodabod said:

Soemtimes you have to use some pressure when tightening the claw to avoid it slipping.

Yep, this is what ended up working :)

Super annoying case design.

Posted
On 7/26/2018 at 1:41 PM, clockboy said:

I found the Chinese crystal lift tool was poor and did not work . However the Used Bergeon lift tool I purchased works great. I have read the Chinese crystal lift tool does work if the claws are dressed.

I have a Chinese one and it is the only tool of any make that has not needed correction. In fact it works very well indeed but of course will not work with every type of crystal.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...