Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I stumbled across this clock and no I don't plan to bid on it, but was just interested in what the experts think as to when this clock was made.

Its certainly no earlier than the 1920s or 30s, but I suspect much later.

The enamel dial looks a pretty average finish and the nuts and C clips make me think its a modern clock (Within the last 20 years) made in the far east.

Would I be correct in assuming so?

Just trying to broaden my knowledge on what is genuine and what isn't.

https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Superb-Vintage-Enamel-Mantle-Clock-Cloisonne-Pendulum/253716467326?hash=item3b12ae0e7e:g:dOAAAOSw~R1bNJ5q

Posted

Yes I think you would be correct in your assumption that its no more than 20 years old, it has zero quality the castings are the roughest I have ever seen so I think its far east in origin, yet it already as four bids, its a total waste of money at any price.

Posted

Modern, more than likely from China. The Cloisonné is very poor, you can see it is applied in stripes, no wire visible, antique you would see between the individual pieces.  The C clips are a modern invention, there holding in the arbors. Poor quality movement. Because I’m a mod, I can’t say what I would like to.    

Posted
11 minutes ago, anilv said:

Hands are ugly.. thats the first thing I latched on.

Anilv

The style of the hands can tell you a lot on antique clocks. More so with Longcase Clocks and bracket clocks. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I would have said that clock was made, a long time ago, like last week, it looks awful, very poor quality. And what a cheap movement parts held together with clip washers..

Len

Posted

With the barrel arbors held in with those clips, makes it easy to remove the barrels without taking the rest of the movement apart. Even through the movement is not a good one it has a good point.

Posted
5 hours ago, oldhippy said:

 

With the barrel arbors held in with those clips, makes it easy to remove the barrels without taking the rest of the movement apart. Even through the movement is not a good one it has a good point.

Agree easy strip Oldhippy, but personally I would not trust them, just me..Like when they make a half moon cut out in the plates for the wheels etc, just cheap and nasty.

Posted
2 hours ago, oldhippy said:

I do not like modern clocks or fakes. In my time if it wasn't the proper thing I would not undertake the repair.

Agree the far east etc seem to copy everything, and produce cheap items although people do buy them.. Not me I must add....

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This watch has a pin end mainspring. It's a blued steel spring and may be the original >100 year old part. As you can see, it is quite set. Can anyone suggest where I might be able to obtain such a spring today? Dimensions: Height: 140 Thickness: 010 Arbor diameter: 340 Barrel diameter 989 (1/100 mm)  
    • Many thanks for your answers: 1. I will clean both of them without risk 🙂 2. Both of the rotate inside their setting but they don't seem to come out. I will clean the cock (and the hole jewels) and I will see if they want to go out. I don't intend to force the setting pushing it out by any means. I only hope I don't need the dismantle the whole cock into all its components...! 3. I won't touch it. Only clean. I don't want to take risk... Thanks again! Thanks for your anwer. Yes, I meant short. In fact there are 2 pictures where It can be seen that the balance almost touch the main plate. The balance only spin freely when I loosen the cock screw and also the bottom jewel setting. I cleaned the exterior jewels on the cock and on the main plate. But I can't take the interior settings. I uploaded 1 picture on this  My reply to your comments are below. Apologies as I Replied rather than quote... 
    • By worn pivot, Do you mean short ?   A pivot is not short if balance spins freely on it. Dial up & dial down tests are good test for investigation, visual test alone doesn't suffice. A thorough test is free oscilation, which is best done when balance cock is adjusted with acceptable end shake. Balance settings on both side should be dismantled as they must be cleaned, pegged and inspected.  Stud & pivot & where spring leaves the collet are on one line, show entire coil and where you think is bent, please. Regs  
    • 1. I think the pivots look pretty good and I wouldn't worry about wear. 2. Yes, I think the hole jewels should come out for cleaning, complete with their spring setting. I don't have experience with Rolex but I've seen this spring type setting in another movement. They may be stuck in with old dried oil. 3. Yes, I think the overcoil is out of shape.
    • Yes, I'm looking at this option. I have a good friend from childhood who happens to be a goldsmith, and he would certainly be able to tackle the second hole to my specifications. I usually avoid this path because, since he deals with gold pieces, every time he stops to help me with "frugal" parts, he is objectively losing money. I agree with you. Even though I couldn't justify paying this much for the set (they only sell the whole set or the sole case tube), I understand the price tag. The trouble with this particular stem set is that the most common use case for it is the Technos Skydiver, a watch whose price certainly justifies 220 USD for a brand-new stem set.   I have messaged them only on the surface, without specifying my needs. They already stated that they don't sell the single female part, only the full set. What I still don't get is the need for a second hole. Is it supposed to be some sort of regulation, meaning that I can fit the head of the male part in any of the two holes to adjust the pressure of the spring? Does this mean that a single-hole female part has a chance to work with my setup? I'll later test this hypothesis while continuing the assembly of the movement. Some photos are attached. Can you judge this bracelet? It was dirt cheap (4 USD), genuine leather, wife's choice. I have just realized my dial is upside down. lol
×
×
  • Create New...