Jump to content

What am I? Ingersoll or Trenton or ?


Recommended Posts

I have this watch - It's my first whole watch success (in that it's working and I've actually made it better ;) ). Only problem is one of identification.

It's marked as an "Ingersoll-Trenton". I can find Ingersoll and Trenton and I know Trenton was purchased by Ingersoll in 1908.

So my watch has serial number 3372817 - which is it? An Ingersoll, a Trenton or something else?

 

ingersol_serial.JPG

P3250001.JPG

P3250009.JPG

P3250010.JPG

Trenton_serial.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, khunter said:

after the purchase of Trenton,

So that puts the watch post 1908 but the Ingersoll serial lookup suggests 1905 at the latest.

Which serial number list should I use? Do you have any other suggestions on trying to date this watch?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Here is what I found on the net:

The Trenton Watch Company was a successor to the New Haven Watch Company, which had been started in 1883 in New Haven, Connecticut, but had undergone financial reorganization in 1887.

Trenton produced nearly two million watches, most of which were lower to mid-grade pieces in the 7-9-11 jewel range. Most of the watches produced were intended for the domestic market, but factory records indicate that some watches were produced for export to England around the turn of the century. Trenton was subsequently sold to Ingersoll in 1908.

Trenton-produced watches were marketed under a variety of brand names, including: Trenton, Ingersoll Trenton, Fortuna, Calumet USA, Advance Watch Co, Marvel Watch Co, Reliance Watch Co, Locomotive Special and Engineers Special. Both the Engineers Special and Locomotive Special were marked as 23-jewel watches, even though they had only 7 functional jewels... the others were fake and were entirely for appearance! Similarly, the watches sold under the Marvel Watch Co. brand-name were marked 23-jewels, even though all but 7 jewels were non-functional. Some of these "fake jewel" watches can be quite collectible today.

Trenton also produced two 18-size fly-back chronograph models, both with 9 jewels. Based on a Grade 40 or 41 with chronograph modifications, the watches were produced in limited quantity, and these watches are considered to be quite rare and collectible today.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In one of the other discussions of this watch you had a link to your Google drive with photographs. What makes the photographs interesting is the case? So I have a link to an article about the case making company. Then the case has marks on it like a British case or in this case a Birmingham case. Then one of the letters is a date code Which dates it is 1908 or 1909.

 

http://www.vintagewatchstraps.com/blogdennison.php

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This imagecaseStamps.thumb.JPG.7e5838e964c06f717d94f312361e4da4.JPG

So that hallmark is Birmingham 1908

https://www.silvermakersmarks.co.uk/Dates/Birmingham/Cycle 1900-1924.html

 

hallmark.JPG.d4d1d2acd7448242d7eb93bec7f25b19.JPG

And the makers stamp is as you say Dennison

http://www.silvercollection.it/ENGLISHSILVERMARKSXA3.html#862ING

 

So - would it be reasonable to suggest this watch was made on or around the year that Ingersoll bought Trenton - i.e. 1908?

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, p2n said:

So - would it be reasonable to suggest this watch was made on or around the year that Ingersoll bought Trenton - i.e. 1908?

Unfortunately it's not quite that simple as vinn3 As pointed out above. I don't know enough about the watch company in question but a lot of the watch companies sold their movements separate. You'd go to a jewelry store the movements would be in one case the cases would be another case. They did not come together. Not to say that they couldn't come together because often times the watch companies did case their watches up. Then through time watches get swapped in their cases. A lot of times you can tell that if you look where the screws go for holding it in the case they'll be additional marks where others screws were.

So what we do get is we know when the case was made. If you can find data that the company purchased their cases from Denison then all of this becomes much much more important. But even though it does give you some dates the case seems about the right time for the watch it's just another clue or breadcrumb to follow on your trail to.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Unfortunately it's not quite that simple as vinn3 As pointed out above. I don't know enough about the watch company in question but a lot of the watch companies sold their movements separate. You'd go to a jewelry store the movements would be in one case the cases would be another case. They did not come together. Not to say that they couldn't come together because often times the watch companies did case their watches up. Then through time watches get swapped in their cases. A lot of times you can tell that if you look where the screws go for holding it in the case they'll be additional marks where others screws were.

So what we do get is we know when the case was made. If you can find data that the company purchased their cases from Denison then all of this becomes much much more important. But even though it does give you some dates the case seems about the right time for the watch it's just another clue or breadcrumb to follow on your trail to.

  it's not simple.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My thinking goes along these lines:

  1. The name - Ingersoll-Trenton. This must be after the purchase of Trenton by Ingersoll in 1908
  2. The Serial number. I get a range from 1885 to 1908
  3. The case - manufactured in 1908

So the purchase says it can't be before 1908 or it would not have the combined name.

The Serial number says it can't be much after 1908

The case was made in 1908

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

  another twist to the pocket watch story;  a man like my granfather might have a solid gold elgin with 14 jewels.  1929 in the U S A , there started "the great depresion".  off to the jeweler he would go to have the very good movement transfered to a "nickel silver case". vin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi I got a Jaeger LeCoultre K911 movement, where one of the stems was broken. Part no. Should be 401.  Im based in Europe and tried Cousins but its discontinued. They except to get stem in stock for cal. K916 but will that work? Or Is there a way out to join the ends?
    • The part was how it fell out of the movement - the train wheel bridge wasn’t screwed in.    I’ll probably dismantle the part, if I can, to work it out.    The train of wheels ran fine - it was only once the keyless works were installed I noticed the problem. 
    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...