Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

A recent question from Geo on whether I would get the dial refurbished on  a recently-bought Longines prompted some musing on my part about the vexed question of restoration - particularly of dials. It's a question I've never resolved in my own mind, so have usually tended to let things lie.

 

Coincidentally, I asked the D.R. Bill dial restoration people to give me a quote on a Luxor chrono dial which is tatty and has been "nibbled on part of the edge (I've included a pic below). He gave me a reasonable quote and said that he could do it "as long as I have the sizes in stock" - which implies that, rather than working to restore the original dial, there'll be a lookalike replacement. Roberto Facchini in Norwich gave a me a similar quote, but I got the impression that it was more of a restoration job. Difficult...

 

My problem is that, for me, a watch is a piece of history, and a 50-year old watch has 50 years of being used, lived with, etc. And I worry that, having had work done, I'll always regret the lack of the original. If a dial was really, really in a mess - which means that I would probably have bought the watch for the movement - then the decision would be easier!

 

post-64-0-12371100-1411208688_thumb.jpg

Edited by WillFly
Posted

Just my view but I would like to see a quality watch restored,  there is something satisfying about bringing a much abused and knocked about watch back to almost as new condition for future generations to enjoy. 

Posted

Is there a way just to clean and relume the dial, markers and/or hands? That would be a good compromise. As a comparison, it would be like me after a shave! :)  (not removing the "age" but cleaner looking!)

Posted

Hi,

   Just to throw my two cents in here I think of a vintage watch much like a vintage car. They might be original with the paint all faded and having a rust hole or two in the fenders but look how much better they look after a good restoration. Of course the restoration will also prevent further damage. A friend once had a MG A I think it was. In the passenger seat you could look through the floor and see the asphalt going by. To get out you had to share the one door handle. It was much safer after restoration and looked a lot better as well. It's ok to restore paintings to the point of replacing holes in canvas.

   On watches we replace the crystal, polish the cases and change the bands without batting an eye. For me I want the dial looking nice as well. This is just my opinion and I wouldn't try to influence anyone to change their mind. Now the way I did the dial on my Omega is I bought another movement with a very bad dial that was like mine. Send that dial off to be refinished and kept the original dial on the watch until I got the refinished one back.  

Charles

  • Like 2
Posted

Depends on each individual watch of course but in many cases restoring the dial has the effect of 'conserving' the rest of the watch, because it becomes valued and treasured again instead of being consigned to the scrap heap or spare parts bin.

Posted (edited)

Personally, given a choice between a restored Luxor dial and the one pictured, I'd pay a lot more for the one pictured. It really depends on the end goal, does it not? Some people like seeing a watch's age, others want it to look almost brand new. If I had to, I might try to get the "nibbling" at the 5 o'clock mark repaired as much as possible but hi-res pictures usually amplify how aging detracts from appearance so it's hard for me to judge.

Of course, there's also times when "patina" is just "dirt" ;). So a cleanup, as opposed to a full restoration, is often acceptable if the dial CAN be cleaned and it's obviously far gone. And there's those times when restoration does actually preserve the rest of the watch and should precedence, like old crystals whose emissions in time can rust the movement and/or dial.

I can see why the choice is hard though, I love that dial design and if there no nibbling, I wouldn't even consider touching it.

Here's an example of another reason why I'd hesitate getting a dial restored. At the very end is a comparison between the original dial and a restoration. The two have substantial differences. To me, this would count as a terrible dial restoration...

Edited by PadraicB
  • Like 2
Posted

I can see what you mean, Padriac - the "restored"/new dial has lost the character of the original watch. It could just be a different watch.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, I recently bought a Brenrey watch cleaning machine. It is in really good condition but the motor speed control is not great. The motor start at relatively high rmp, it can go faster but not slower or stoped by turning the knob. I think it is the rheostat but outside YEC F-50 there are no other markings on it. It measures 1550 ohms max resistance.  Does anyone know what should be the specs of a rheostat or potentiometer to replace it? Thank you in advance.  
    • Interesting, thanks for the detailed post. I saw one of those Swiss Nano machines a while back in another youtube video from  the Weiss Watch Company.
    • Hello and welcome to the fo4um. Enjoy
    • Welcome to the forum, enjoy.
    • You're asking a pretty broad question and you didn't specify the machine but yes it's simple especially if you have the right machine. The question has problems but I'll take it as it is. Is it really that simple yes especially if you have the right machine. So in the video below he's making a screw and yes it really is that simple but pay attention to the machine it is not simple at all probably wasn't cheap but it is small it will probably fit in your garage. Unfortunately wouldn't fit in my garage as it's far too cluttered up with things. In the video he talks about making a screw and pay attention to the machine. The machine has lots and lots and lots of cutters and lots of things to do lots of machining all-in-one machine conceivably one step after another all programmable. If you look at his channel lots of CNC's stuff and there are several other videos related to this machine. He goes to the factory where they talk about it and show all the other machines they make in Switzerland.  I did look up the specifications the machine I don't recall the price it's not going to cut wheels I think it has a maximum diameter around 11 mm basically it's really good for making small diameter watch parts. Then in one of the other videos he goes to a factory that used to make parts with waterpowered machinery been in business for 100 years and everything they now make is made with CNC machines including this one. What was interesting with the factory photo was that when they make some parts they can put them on a optical comparator comparator compares with whatever the reference is and the machine can be programmed to adjust its cutting to make sure everything is actually being made to specifications. Oh and then somewhere in all of this there was at least one picture of a balance staff can't have a CNC Swiss machine without making balance staffs.   It would be really nice if we had pictures of the machine. Then yes if you look at the page for wheel cutting you can enter parameters and it will generate a G code but he left out things? Notice he has a picture of a complete wheel but the G code isn't making a complete wheel it's only cutting the gear teeth I don't see whereas the program for crossing out the spokes? Typically when you see people cutting gears once the teeth are cut most the time the spokes are cut by hand. Occasionally someone will mill them out but typically not with the program which seems strange if you have CNC capability for instance one of my friends fill it used to design assembly line equipment or things to make things. So his hobby was to continue to make tools to make things like clocks. Very interesting and clever clocks but his true fund was making the machines to make the clocks. Then machine is not controlled by G code like we would typically find today as the stepping motor controller he has was made a long time ago and the individual controllers used a textbased program. So the company had a editor you could write a program to cause each the stepping motors to do something. So basically once you figure out how to cut a gear he would just change the parameters for different size gears so here's an example of a gear as you can see we have the teeth and the spokes. Then we have a picture the machine which sucks because it would've been so much nicer if I could've taken a picture when it was cutting a gears so we can see things better. Then yes there is a worm gear stepping motor indexing this is a mini lathe and the indexing is at the end of the lathe head hiding. The basic operation of this machine would be brass sheet not cut to a specific diameter size not even round mounted on the machine. Then it turns and a milling cutter will cut the diameter. Then the gear would be cut with a gear cutter. The same mill cutter for the diameter although conceivably change the size I don't know but basically the same milling for cutting the outer diameter would be used to cut the spokes. I really can't remember how he did the center hole but whatever it was was very precise.          
×
×
  • Create New...