Jump to content

ETA 2892 How much endshake on second wheel ?


Recommended Posts

Assembling an ETA 2892 (my first, been waiting a while to get my hands on one :biggrin:) I noticed far too much endshake on the second wheel, due to the train wheel bridge being bent.

I noticed that the centre tube was not pushed all the way home. This could have caused the bridge to bend when screwed down, or someone's pushed the hands on with too much force ?

Anyway, I've got the centre tube pushed home, and now have excessive endshake  - the bridge will have to be bent back  down.  

How much endshake should I have on the  centre wheel, minimal or should it have bit or room to move ? 

 

 

WIN_20180303_16_27_59_Pro.jpg

WIN_20180303_16_29_06_Pro.jpg

WIN_20180303_16_31_30_Pro.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every wheel and arbor in a watch must have endshake, or they will bind stopping then watch. The amount of endsahke must be enough to see with magnification, BUT should not be to excessive. The amount of end shake should be no more than half of the pivot length.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, clockboy said:

Every wheel and arbor in a watch must have endshake, or they will bind stopping then watch. The amount of endsahke must be enough to see with magnification, BUT should not be to excessive. The amount of end shake should be no more than half of the pivot length.

Thanks, it's hard with endshake to define how much a 'bit' or a 'lot' is - but 'half the pivot length' is just what I needed to know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, rogart63 said:

Looks like it's a little to much. Did you take the picture before you bent it back?  Looks like the jewel could be sitting to high also. Shouldn't that be the same level as the other jewels?  

Good point, I'll push the jewel back level 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I pushed the jewel level, a very slight bend of the bridge, and the endshake looks OK.

One weakness of a cantilevered bridge like this, is if someone is heavy handed fitting the second hand, you can end up with a bent bridge or displaced jewel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must apologise I did not read your original post in full. The fact that the bridge is not straight could cause other issues when the watch is in different positions because the wheel is not sitting straight. Poor meshing of the gears could cause binding and erratic performance.  In may opinion the bridge needs to be straightened if that is possible that is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Finally got round to assembling this movement, but ended up stripping it again due to poor amplitude. I'm not happy with the gear train - there's some 'stiction' sometimes.

I pushed the second wheel jewel level at the top as Rogart63 suggested, but now it sticks out the bottom.

Also the pivot is a VERY loose fit in the hole - the picture isn't very good , but the pivot is only about 2/3 the hole width.

Is this correct, or has the jewel been changed ?

 

WIN_20180317_19_24_17_Pro.jpg

WIN_20180317_19_27_30_Pro.jpg

WIN_20180317_19_30_13_Pro.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is the wrong jewel for that wheel, a little side shake is normal but that jewel looks almost twice as big as it should be. I recently replaced a fourth wheel lower jewel, the pivot measured 0.31mm, the proper jewel was 0.32mm. 1/100 of a mm is roughly 0.0004 inches. The pivot should be measured and a new correct jewel fitted. Looks like someone tried to "just get it running" with whatever was handy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mikepilk said:

Thanks for confirming that. It's going to be tricky measuring the jewel as it's so small. I bought a box of assorted jewels, looks like one of those should fit. 

A good digital caliper would be fine to measure the outside dimension, use the wheel arbor to confirm the hole size. A jewel press would be the best way to press out and install a new jewel, not a difficult job at all.

Edited by khunter
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, khunter said:

A good digital caliper would be fine to measure the outside dimension, use the wheel arbor to confirm the hole size. A jewel press would be the best way to press out and install a new jewel, not a difficult job at all.

I measured the OD with digital calipers (too hard to hold in a micrometer) at 0.70 mm.

From my mixed box of jewels I've found a suitable candidate - I've no means of measuring the hole, but it sits on the pivot with just a little bit of wobble. 

I have a jewel press, only used it a few times, and not on such a small jewel. I'll make sure I don't have too much coffee before trying :startle:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should be good to go. I've found that slowly pressing in the jewel in small increments, then checking the endshake works best as opposed to trying to get it right the first try. Check the hole/pivot size under high mag to make sure it's not too sloppy but it sounds like you're on the right track...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

New jewel fitted and looking good !

In the end it was pretty easy to fit. The seconds wheel now spins nicely with correct endshake.

With the pallet out I still have some 'stiction' - usually the gear train moves with the slightest turn of the crown, but  sometimes it takes a full turn or more to move.

The gear train on it's own seems fine - spins nicely when I use the blower.  The barrel and intermediate wheel also seem OK when isolated so I'm at a bit of a loss to work out what the problem is. 

Could the arbor be binding in the barrel ?  Any other suggestions ?

 

WIN_20180320_17_41_40_Pro.jpg

WIN_20180320_17_52_27_Pro.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That looks MUCH better!!

As for the stiction, I had a similar problem lately, and turned out one of the train wheels was not perfectly flat/perpendicular to the arbor. Took a little work on the truing caliper and it works great now. I'd also check the barrel arbor for free spin (without the mainspring of course). Wonderful job on the jeweling!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 20/03/2018 at 7:11 PM, khunter said:

That looks MUCH better!!

As for the stiction, I had a similar problem lately, and turned out one of the train wheels was not perfectly flat/perpendicular to the arbor. Took a little work on the truing caliper and it works great now. I'd also check the barrel arbor for free spin (without the mainspring of course). Wonderful job on the jeweling!

Had another go at sorting this watch out - it would run OK for a while and suddenly stop. Took me ages to determine the problem. I always assume it's pivots/jewels etc. Turns out it's the mainplate. As you can see in the pic, there's distortion at the recess for the escape wheel. You can also see the web holding the centre tube is not vertical. 

There are also raised dimples under the base of the balance cock. This watch has had a hard life!

I don't expect I'd be able to straighten the mainplate - there's no flat references to work to. 

So if anyone knows where I can get a 2892 mainplate, please let me know

 

WIN_20180405_17_39_42_Pro.jpgWIN_20180405_17_39_53_Pro.thumb.jpg.79588821ffc93b82ed789efd0135b67a.jpg

Edited by mikepilk
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Post some pictures , some good close ones of the parts you've described. 
    • Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. If its a potential problem for amateurs to use then i would prefer not to take the risk .
    • Following on from my question about identifying screws in the AS2063 movement that basically fell out of the case in bits, I’m pleased to report that I’ve got it all back together, and the movement is running pretty well.    But… There’s something wrong with the keyless works and hand setting. It’s fine in winding and quickset date position - these work - but in hand setting position winding the crown turns the whole gear train.  I don’t really understand how it’s meant to work. It doesn’t have a traditional friction fit cannon pinion.  The second wheel is unusual with a pair of smaller pinions on it, which seem to interact with the barrel and the motion works.    Could this be the problem? I must admit I just cleaned it and popped it in place when reassembling the gear train. I’ve lubricated the pivots but didn’t do anything to the extra bits on the second wheel.    Does this make sense and is anyone able to figure out what I’m doing wrong? Thanks in advance, as always.    ETA - the parts list calls it the Great Wheel, not second wheel. 
    • You're thinking metal to jewel in general I guess. Maybe it would be a good idea to peg the pallet staff jewel hole on the main plate after the epilame treatment. I think that could work as it is my impression that the epilame doesn't sit very hard, but I could be wrong about that so feel free to educate me. I didn't remember that 9501 was thixotropic (thanks for the link). That would mean it's even runnier during impact (lower viscosity) so perhaps it's time I get some fresh grease as mine seems a bit too runny. What I have seen is a whitish surface after washing but it goes away if I scrub the surface with a brush in a degreaser (Horosolv). I don't think it embeds itself in the metal but sticks very hard to the metal. I don't worry too much about the cleaning solution. I just want perfectly clean parts and my solution can be replaced for little money (ELMA RED 1:9). Anyway, I quite often need "to strip back and rebuild" and scrubbing parts by hand isn't exactly the most stimulating part of a service. Just got confirmation that Moebius 9501 has a lower viscosity (68 cSt at 20° C) than 9504 (305 cSt at 20°). The viscosity of Molykote DX is 285-315 cSt at -25° to +125° C. I was surprised to see that the viscosity of Moebius 9010 (thin oil!) is higher (150 cSt at 20°) than my 9501 grease!
    • I’ve had a couple movements where it is clear the previous watchmaker was diligent with lubrication but the old epilam had turned to a fine white powder covering the pallet fork and keyless parts, which can’t be good for parts. I’m spare with epi since I don’t know how long it takes to degrade to that state…
×
×
  • Create New...