Jump to content

Hamilton Wont Service Their Quartz


Recommended Posts

I bought a Hamilton watch on shopgoodwill.  They claimed they ran it on a turbo gear train testing device.  I put a new battery in and the second hand briefly fidgeted and that was it.   I sent it to the official Hamilton service center in Secaucus New Jersey and they wrote back that they don't service these quartz watches.   It uses a movement marked 980.153 which can be had for about $40.00.   Am I missing something here.  Couldn't somebody just swap out the movements and that would be the simplest and cheapest repair?    I am wondering if I could even do it.   Anybody recommend a reputable repair person in NYC or Jersey that could do the task.   Any advice is appreciated.

 

Rob

66993342215433ey.JPG

IMG_1117.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rwh56 said:

I bought a Hamilton watch on shopgoodwill.  They claimed they ran it on a turbo gear train testing device.  I put a new battery in and the second hand briefly fidgeted and that was it.   I sent it to the official Hamilton service center in Secaucus New Jersey and they wrote back that they don't service these quartz watches.   It uses a movement marked 980.153 which can be had for about $40.00.   Am I missing something here.  Couldn't somebody just swap out the movements and that would be the simplest and cheapest repair?    I am wondering if I could even do it.   Anybody recommend a reputable repair person in NYC or Jersey that could do the task.   Any advice is appreciated.

 

Rob

66993342215433ey.JPG

IMG_1117.jpg

A service can be done, but a new movement would probably be cheaper and you'd have a new movement. Its relatively straightforward to replace a movement, but if you've no experience or tools, then I would not suggest it. First thing you'll need to do is figure out the correct height of the movement by measuring from center wheel to baseplate. Do you have any experience disassembling a watch?

J

5a99feb005e68_ScreenShot2018-03-02at8_44_22PM.thumb.png.53f1fe0da79097014e78b9c88e43d98d.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have fooled around with a Timex, and I have cleaned a few between the lens camera shutters.  (And I once put a 1600 cc VW bus engine in a 1960 VW Beetle.)   So, I am not really experienced at all.  

Thank you for pointing out that there are different sizes of the same movement.  I guess I will need to buy a metric micrometer.  But then maybe I should give it to a watch repair shop.    

I was just a bit amazed that Hamilton wouldn't even bother replacing the movement.

Again, thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rwh56 said:

Thank you for pointing out that there are different sizes of the same movement.  I guess I will need to buy a metric micrometer.  But then maybe I should give it to a watch repair shop.    

I was just a bit amazed that Hamilton wouldn't even bother replacing the movement.

No need for a micrometer, a vernier caliper will do. No surprise that Hamilton won't fix it, just like most other brands they are there to sell new watches, not mess with old ones. It could have been a bit different if it was a mechanical watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Following up on my movement replacement adventure:

I removed the movement, and my mitutoyo vernier caliper measures 3.6 mm.   Esslinger sells a 3.2, 3.4 and a 3.8.  Though ETA documents indicate they make a 3.3, 3.55 and a 3.8.   The case has a curved crystal, so getting something slightly bigger may not be a problem, but I cant begin to guess how much room I actually have under the crystal.  

On another topic, I managed to lose my extraordinarily small second hand.   One moment it was held by my tweezers and between the watch and the loose parts cup, it disappeared.   I am completely disgusted with myself.  Any chance I can find a replacement?  This work is on a such a small scale that I am not at all comfortable with.   But now that I have started, I would like to see it through.  Hard to take one step forward, and then two steps back losing the hand.

Again, thanks in advance for any advice.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Rwh56 said:

The case has a curved crystal, so getting something slightly bigger may not be a problem, but I cant begin to guess how much room I actually have under the crystal.
On another topic, I managed to lose my extraordinarily small second hand.   

The different heights for the hour wheels aren't much about room under the crystal, but dial thickness. In any case you can reuse the original one. A seconds hands is light and won't fly far, check your clothes carefully. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Rwh56 Its ok to "feel disgusted" but know that losing/dropping parts happens --to me definitely. look for the little hand for no longer than 30 minutes or you'll go nuts. Take comfort in knowing the measurements of the hands:

Hand Sizes 120 hour / 70 minute / 20 second; which is to say 1.2mm hour, 0.70mm minute and 0.20mm second. That is a standard size so you should be able to replace it IF you don't find it, and probably a replacement movement will come with a seconds hand but it won't be the same shape or painted.

J

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I am bailing out on this repair.   After losing the second hand, I saw that I had also scuffed up the second hand part of the dial.  So, I looked at ebay to see if someone was selling one for cheap, and sure enough there was a working one that was going for the price of a new movement.   Since this started out as a gift, I have to say I will just gift the new one and be done with it.   I suppose I can screw around with the non-working one, maybe still get a new movement and have a his and hers matching watches.   Anyways, thanks for the advice from everyone.

 

HamiltonSecondFace.jpg

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I found out recently, even if you try to do the right thing, and use a clear plastic bag over the hands before prying, you can still damage the dial with an improper technique or tool(s). Don't use the thinnest bag, and sharpest screwdrivers, to do it, if you can avoid it. Fortunately, the damage I did recently was very close to the center arbor. Nobody will see it without close inspection, but I'll know the scratches are there from my shoddy work. I decided that from now on I'll try the most protective, and probably hardest to fit under hands, method first, then work my way back through other less safe, but perhaps easier, ways.

The proper tools take a while to gather before you can really start to safely work on watches. Live and learn. But don't feel alone in the world. Good luck.

Edited by MrRoundel
spelling error.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used some inexpensive watch hand levers from Esslinger.   They had pretty rough ends.   I sanded them smooth until they looked OK under my dissection microscope.  The ends were still blunt, and I wonder if I should have thinned them more because there is so little space under the second hand on this watch.  Then I used Saran Wrap to protect the surface.  Saran Wrap is pretty thin, and I figured that a thicker plastic sheet, like on the sandwich bags, would prevent the lever ends getting under the watch hand.   The visible scuffs are out by the dial markings, which shows that I scratched the surface before I even got close to the hand.   So, there was some clumsy technique that may be more of the issue.   This was all new and different for me.   I will probably be back asking advice on some other repairs.  There are plenty of cheap watches in the house I would like to get working.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Did you have a look under the ballance? Often the movement maker/number is hidden there.
    • I wonder if 9415 is based on a base oil of 941? it's interesting what questions bring and the tech sheet answers it's the viscosity of the base oil. Then the impact? There is something we're missing here for that which would have a big influence on all of the house image above is 9514 image below is 941.then always interesting when specifications do not exactly agree? They ledge above for 941 indicates 110 viscosity but the image off the spec sheet is slightly less but I guess close enough   my understanding of the concern of too much 9415 is as we know the loss of amplitude. But why do we have a loss of amplitude? So impact it's basically oil should be very slippery. But what about non-impact? Like the edges of the escape wheel? Another thing that comes to play here is the shape of the escape wheel itself. Notice on the last a more vintage escape wheel with just a flat surface whereas the modern escape wheels usually made out of steel versus grass much much thinner their contact areas greatly been reduced and sometimes I think there even slightly curved. So is it conceivable at everything that isn't a flat surface on impact is going to be sticky? So this is where the shape of the escape wheel will have a big impact literally on how slippery things are. Oh and for all of you obsessed with worrying about too much 9415 I never worry about it because typically I'm doing pocket watches and it doesn't seem to be an issue at all. on the other hand I'm much more concerned about a watch that keeps time for 24 hours as opposed to the concern of the group of keeping amplitude for 24 hours. Then yes some pocket watches have steel escape wheels and do look like the escape wheel on the right.   
    • your balance wheel looks interesting in the watch and because it's at an angle it's changing things a little bit. in other words they hairspring is not centered between the regulator pin in the boot and I also noticed your terminal curve is lacking apparently by design? Because if you look in the second image you'll notice yes there's a terminal curve but not as aggressive a one as you normally see on watches at least most watches.   then in all of your images it looks like the boot isn't quite back where it's supposed to be? out of curiosity how did you remove your balance complete and clear the regulator pin? then just in case you weren't aware it rotates out of the way so you can remove the balance complete without bending the pin. Then it's rotated back exactly 90° and yours looks like it's off by just a little bit in the original image and I'm assuming that you just been the pin out of the way? it's always interesting in horology is the variations in the things. Like the image I have above does have a terminal curve but not the most aggressive and yours is even less but that is the way the watch was made. Then the spacing between the regulator pin in the boot should be relatively small basically if you had two pieces of the thickness of your hairspring that's how much space should be there like in this image. But oftentimes watch manufacturers do not necessarily follow the rules  
    • Yep i can see where you're going with that one Rich.  Sooo now that I've frightened the OP into submission 😁. Chief i do apologise for some reason unbeknown to myself I'm in a happy silly mood. So seriously to identify the movement lets have a look at the dial side, learning this part is straightforward, just need a little logic and something called the # BESTFIT BOOKS # . Or the other non American equivalents. 
    • I can definitely see elephant and aardvark and possibly some sort of bird with a large beak 🤣 anyway I'll have a go of getting it flipped over tonight and send some pics
×
×
  • Create New...